Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-12T17:01:28.865Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The distribution of young stars, clusters and cepheids in the Milky Way and M33 - a comparison

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 August 2015

Roberta M. Humphreys
Roberta M. Humphreys*
Affiliation:
University of Minnesota

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Ever since the pioneering work by Morgan and his collaborators (1952, 1953), it has been well known that the distribution of the associations of young stars, HII regions, and young clusters defines the optical spiral features. Although considerable progress has been made in spiral structure studies during these past 25 years, the basic picture of optical spiral structure has not been significantly altered. The three spiral features first described by Morgan are still recognized. Modern work on the various optical spiral features has strengthened and improved the definition of the optical features, especially to larger distances. Most of the improvements and any additions to the basic three-arm pattern have resulted primarily from observations of the spiral tracers in the Southern Milky Way. Specifically, the Sagittarius feature is now generally recognized as the Sagittarius-Carina arm which may indeed be a major arm of the Galaxy. It can now be traced optically to very large distances, up to 6 kpc or more in the direction ℓ = 290°. The Local arm (Cygnus-Orion) probably extends to 4 kpc in the direction of Puppis (ℓ ≅ 240°), and most astronomers would probably agree that our local spiral feature is not a major arm, but an inter-arm feature.

Type
II. THE DISK COMPONENT
Information
Symposium - International Astronomical Union , Volume 84: The Large-Scale Characteristics of the Galaxy , 1979 , pp. 93 - 98
Copyright
Copyright © Reidel 1979 

References

Becker, W. and Fenkart, R.: 1971, Astron. and Astrophys. Suppl. 4, 241.Google Scholar
FitzGerald, M.P., Hurkens, R. and Moffat, A.F.J.: 1976, Astron. and Astrophys., 46, 287.Google Scholar
Garrison, R.E., Hiltner, W.A. and Schild, R.E.: 1977, Ap. J. Suppl., 35, 111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grayzeck, E.J.: 1974, Doctoral Dissertation, Univ. of Maryland.Google Scholar
Hubble, E.: 1926, Ap. J., 63, 236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Humphreys, R.M.: 1973, Astron. and Astrophys. Suppl., 9, 85.Google Scholar
Humphreys, R.M.: 1975, Astron. and Astrophys. Suppl., 19, 243.Google Scholar
Jackson, P.D.: 1976, Doctoral Dissertation, Univ. of Maryland.Google Scholar
Miller, E.W.: 1972, A. J., 77, 216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moffat, A.F.J.: 1972, Astron. and Astrophys. Suppl., 7, 355.Google Scholar
Moffat, A.F.J. and FitzGerald, M.P.: 1974, Astron. and Astrophys. Suppl. 16, 25.Google Scholar
Moffat, A.F.J. and Vogt, N.: 1973, Astron. and Astrophys. Suppl., 10, 135.Google Scholar
Moffat, A.F.J. and Vogt, N.: 1975 Astron. and Astrophys. Suppl., 20, 85.Google Scholar
Moffat, A.F.J. and Vogt, N.: 1975, Astron. and Astrophys. Suppl., 20, 125.Google Scholar
Moffat, A.F.J. and Vogt, N.: 1975, Astron. and Astrophys. Suppl., 20, 155.Google Scholar
Morgan, W.W., Sharpless, S., and Osterbrock, D.E.: 1952, A. J., 53, 3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morgan, W.W., Whitford, A.E., and Code, A.D.: 1953, Ap. J., 118, 318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muzzio, J.C. and Orsatti, A.M.: 1977a, A. J., 82, 345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muzzio, J.C. and Orsatti, A.M.: 1977b, A. J., 82, 474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tammann, G.A.: 1970, in I.A.U. Symposium No. 38, p. 236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vogt, N. and Moffat, A.F.J.: 1972, Astron. and Astrophys. Suppl., 7, 133.Google Scholar
Vogt, N. and Moffat, A.F.J.: 1973, Astron. and Astrophys, Suppl., 9, 97.Google Scholar
Walborn, N.R.: 1973, A. J., 78, 1067.CrossRefGoogle Scholar