Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T04:31:38.258Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Digital Processing on Comets

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 July 2016

D. Kubáček ,
E.M. Pittich  and
J. Zvolánková
D. Kubáček
Affiliation:
Astronomical Institute, Slovak Academy of Sciences, Dúbravská cesta 9, 842 28 Bratislava, Slovak Republic
E.M. Pittich
Affiliation:
Astronomical Institute, Slovak Academy of Sciences, Dúbravská cesta 9, 842 28 Bratislava, Slovak Republic
J. Zvolánková
Affiliation:
Astronomical Institute, Slovak Academy of Sciences, Dúbravská cesta 9, 842 28 Bratislava, Slovak Republic

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Several digital techniques have been used to remove large-scale background variations caused by manufacturing and technology of the photographic processing on old photographic plates ORWO ZU-21. Suppression of these large-scale background variations improved the study of large-scale phenomena in cometary plasma tails and the determination of the solar wind characteristics.

The results obtained from five images of the comet Bradfield 1987 XXIX have been compared. It has been shown that the simple digital techniques used were applicable also to photographic plates with images of lesser quality. They may be utilized in the treatment of old photographic plate archives.

Type
Part Six: Calibration: Astrometric and Photometric
Information
Symposium - International Astronomical Union , Volume 161: Astronomy from Wide-Field Imaging , 1994 , pp. 321 - 327
Copyright
Copyright © Kluwer 1994 

References

Arp, H. and Lorre, J.J., 1976. ‘Image Processing of Galaxy Photographs’, Astrophys. J., 210, 58. Auriere, M. and Coupinot, G., 1989. ‘Background subtraction in the case of crowded fields and steep gradients’, in 1st ESO/ST-ECF Data Analysis Workshop, eds. Grosb⊘l, P., Murtagh, F. and Warmels, R.H., Garching, p. 101.Google Scholar
Djorgovski, S., 1985. ‘Enhancement of features in galaxy images’, SPIE Vol. 627, Instrumentation in Astronomy VI, p. 674.Google Scholar
Djorgovski, S. and Spinrad, H., 1985. ‘Surface photometry of comet P/Encke’, Astron. J., 90, 5, 869.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frieden, B.R. and Wells, D.C., 1978. ‘Restoring with maximum entropy. III. Poisson source and backgrounds’, J. Opt. Soc. Am., 68, 1, 93.Google Scholar
Fukushima, H. and Watanabe, J., 1991. ‘An image processing technique for background subtraction and its application to comet Austin 1989c1.’ Publ. Natl. Astron. Obs. Japan, 2, 185.Google Scholar
Heasley, J.N., 1984. ‘Numerical Restoration of Astronomical Images’, P.A.S.P., 96, 767.Google Scholar
Klinglesmith, D.A., 1981. ‘The interactive astronomical data analysis facility — image enhancement techniques applied to Comet Halley’, in Modern Observational Techniques for Comet, JPL Publication 81–68, p. 223.Google Scholar
Kormendy, J., 1972. ‘Calibration of direct photographs using brightness profiles of field stars’, Astron. J., 78, 3, 255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Larson, S.M., 1986. ‘A review of some digital image processing in cometary research’, in ‘Asteroids, Comets, Meteors II’, eds. Lagerkvist, C.-I., Lindblad, B.A., Lundstedt, H., and Rickman, H., Uppsala University, Uppsala, p. 449.Google Scholar
Larson, S.M., 1992. ‘Evaluating some computer enhancement algorithms that improve the visibility of cometary morphology’, in ‘Asteroids, Comets, Meteors 1991’, eds. Harris, A.W. and Bowell, E., p. 337.Google Scholar
Larson, S.M. and Sekanina, Z., 1984a. ‘Coma morphology and dust-emission pattern of periodic comet Halley. I’, Astron. J., 89, 4, 571.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Larson, S.M. and Sekanina, Z., 1984b. ‘Coma morphology and dust-emission pattern of periodic comet Halley. II’, Astron. J., 89, 9, 1408.Google Scholar
Larson, S.M. and Sekanina, Z. 1985. ‘Coma morphology and dust-emission pattern of periodic comet Halley. III’, Astron. J., 90, 5, 823.Google Scholar
Lorre, J.J., 1978. ‘Enhancements of the jets in NGC 1907’, Astrophys. J., 222, L99.Google Scholar
Matuska, W. Jr., Janney, D.H., Farrell, J.A. and Keller, C.F. Jr., 1978. ‘Enhancement of Solar corona and comet details’, Optical Engineering, 17, 6, 661.Google Scholar
Schwartz, G., Cosmovici, C., Mack, P. and Ip, W., 1989. ‘Image processing techniques for gas morphology studied in the coma of comet Halley’, Adv. Space Res., 9, 3, 217.Google Scholar
Schweizer, F. and Ford, W.K. Jr., 1985. ‘Fine structure in elliptical galaxies’, in ‘New Aspects of Galaxy Photometry’, ed. Nieto, J.-L., Lecture Notes in Physics , 232, Springer-Verlag, New York, p. 145.Google Scholar
Thonnat, M. and Llebaria, A., 1981. ‘Two algorithms used to determine the plate background and applications’, in ‘Astronomical Photography 1981’, eds. Heudier, J.-L. and Sim, M.E., CERGA, Nice, p. 251.Google Scholar
Walterbos, R.A.M. and Kennicutt, R.C. Jr., 1985. ‘Photographic surface photometry of the Andromeda Galaxy’, in ‘New Aspects of Galaxy Photometry’, ed. Nieto, J.-L., Lecture Notes in Physics , 232, Springer Verlag, New York, p. 245.Google Scholar
Watanabe, J., Aoki, T., Taniguchi, Y. and Tarusawa, K., 1989. ‘Photographic Observations of comet Bradfield 1987 XXIX at the Kiso Observatory’, Publ. Natl. Astron. Obs. Japan, 1, 71.Google Scholar