Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T03:22:15.887Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Diffuse Gamma Rays of Galactic and Extragalactic Origin: Preliminary Results from EGRET

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 May 2016

P. Sreekumar
Affiliation:
NASA/Goddard Space Flight Center (USRA), Greenbelt, MD 20771, USA
D.A. Kniffen
Affiliation:
Hampden-Sydney College, Hampden-Sydney, VA 23943, USA

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The all-sky survey in high energy gamma rays (E>30 MeV) carried out by the Energetic Gamma Ray Experiment Telescope (EGRET) aboard the Compton Gamma Ray Observatory provides for the first time an opportunity to examine in detail diffuse gamma-ray emission of extra-galactic origin. The observed diffuse emission at high galactic latitudes is generally assumed to have a galactic component arising from cosmic-ray interactions with the local interstellar gas and radiation, in addition to an isotropic component presumably of extragalactic origin. The galactic component can be estimated from a model of the interstellar medium and cosmic-ray distribution. Since the derived extragalactic spectrum depends very much on the success of our galactic model, the consistency of the galactic diffuse emission model is examined both spectrally and spatially with existing EGRET observations. In conjunction with this model, EGRET observations of the high latitude emission are used to examine the flux and spectrum of the residual extragalactic emission. This residual emission could be either truly diffuse in origin or could arise from accumulated emission from unresolved sources particularly in the light of EGRET observations showing the presence of numerous gamma-ray bright active galactic nuclei.

Type
Part I: Invited Reviews
Copyright
Copyright © Kluwer 1996 

References

Bailes, M., & Kniffen, D.A., 1992, ApJ, 391, 659.Google Scholar
Bertsch, D. L., Dame, T. M., Fichtel, C. E., Hunter, S. D., Sreekumar, P., Stacy, J. G., & Thaddeus, P., 1993, ApJ, 416, 587.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bertsch, D.L., et al. 1992, Nature, 357, 306.Google Scholar
Burton, W.B., & Liszt, H.S., 1983, A&AS, 52, 63.Google Scholar
Dame, T.M., et al. 1987, ApJ, 322, 706.Google Scholar
Dickey, J.M., & Lockman, F.J., 1990, Ann. Rev. Astron. Astrophys., 28, 215.Google Scholar
Fichtel, C.E. et al. 1994, ApJS, 94, 551.Google Scholar
Fichtel, C.E., et al. 1993, A&AS, 97, 13.Google Scholar
Fichtel, C. E., Özel, M., Stone, R., & Sreekumar, P., 1991, ApJ, 374, 134.Google Scholar
Fichtel, C.E., Simpson, G.A., & Thompson, D.J., 1978, ApJ, 222, 833.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fierro, J.M., et al. 1993, ApJ, 413, L27.Google Scholar
Ginzburg, V. L., Khazan, Ya. M., Ptuskin, V.S., 1980, Astrophys. Space Sci., 68, 295.Google Scholar
Hunter, S.D. et al. 1995, (in preparation).Google Scholar
Kanbach, G., et al. 1994, A&A (in press).Google Scholar
Kerr, F.J., Bowers, P.F., Jackson, P.D., & Kerr, M., 1986, A&AS, 66, 373.Google Scholar
Kraushaar, W.L., et al. 1972, ApJ, 177, 341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mattox, J.R., et al. 1995, (in preparation).Google Scholar
Mayer-Hasselwander, H.A., et al. 1994, ApJ, 421, 276.Google Scholar
Nolan, P.L., et al. 1993, ApJ, 409, 697.Google Scholar
Reynolds, R.J., 1993, Back to the Galaxy, AIP conf. Proc. 278, Ed. Holt, S. & Verter, F. Google Scholar
Sreekumar, P. et al. 1992, ApJ, 400, L67.Google Scholar
Sreekumar, P. et al. 1993, PRL, 70, 127.Google Scholar
Sreekumar, P., et al. 1994, Bull. Amer. Astron. Soc., 25, 1293.Google Scholar
Sreekumar, P. et al. 1995, (in preparation).Google Scholar
Strong, A., et al. 1988. A&A, 207, 1.Google Scholar
Taylor, J.H., & Cordes, J.M., 1993, ApJ, 411, 674.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, D. J., & Fichtel, C. E., 1982, A&A, 109, 352.Google Scholar
Thompson, D.J., et al. 1993, ApJS, 86, 629.Google Scholar
Thompson, D.J., et al. 1992, Nature, 359, 615.Google Scholar
Weaver, H., & Williams, D.R.W., 1974, A&AS, 17, 1.Google Scholar