Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T03:31:08.181Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Determination of Polar Motion and Earth Rotation from Laser Tracking of Satellites

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 August 2015

David E. Smith ,
Ronald Kolenkiewicz ,
Peter J. Dunn  and
Mark Torrence
David E. Smith
Affiliation:
Geodynamics Branch, Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, Maryland
Ronald Kolenkiewicz
Affiliation:
Geodynamics Branch, Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, Maryland
Peter J. Dunn
Affiliation:
EG&G, Washington Analytical Services Center, Inc., Riverdale, Maryland
Mark Torrence
Affiliation:
EG&G, Washington Analytical Services Center, Inc., Riverdale, Maryland

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Laser tracking of the Lageos spacecraft has been used to derive the position of the Earth's pole of rotation at 5-day intervals during October, November and December 1976. The estimated precision of the results is 0.01 to 0.02 arcseconds in both x and y components, although the formal uncertainty is an order of magnitude better, and there is general agreement with the Bureau International de l'Heure smoothed pole path to about 0.02 arcseconds. Present orbit determination capability of Lageos is limited to about 25 cm rms fit to data over periods of 5 days and about 50 cm over 50 days. The present major sources of error in the perturbations of Lageos are Earth and ocean tides followed by the Earth's gravity field, and solar and Earth reflected radiation pressure. Ultimate accuracy for polar motion and Earth rotation from Lageos after improved modeling of the perturbing forces appears to be of order ± 5 cm for polar motion over a period of about 1 day and about ± 0.2 to ± 0.3 milliseconds in U.T. for periods up to 2 or 3 months.

Type
Part V: Satellite Laser Ranging
Information
Symposium - International Astronomical Union , Volume 82: Time and the Earth's Rotation , 1979 , pp. 231 - 238
Copyright
Copyright © Reidel 1979 

References

Dunn, P. J., Smith, D. E., and Kolenkiewicz, R.: 1977, J. Geophys. Res. 82, pp. 895–897.Google Scholar
Kolenkiewicz, R., Smith, D. E., and Dunn, P. J.: 1974, in Veis, G. (ed.), “The Use of Artificial Satellites for Geodesy and Geodynamics”, National Technical University of Athens, Athens, pp. 813–823.Google Scholar
Kolenkiewicz, R., Smith, D. E., Rubincam, D. P., Dunn, P. J., and Torrence, M. H.: 1977, Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. A. 284, pp. 485–494.Google Scholar
Lerch, F. J., Klosko, S. M., Laubscher, R. D., and Wagner, C. A.: 1977, “Gravity Model Improvement Using GEOS-3 (GEM 9 and 10)”, Goddard Space Flight Center, X-921-77-246.Google Scholar
Smith, D. E.: 1970, in Morando, B. (ed.), “Dynamics of Satellites”, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp. 284–294.Google Scholar
Smith, D. E., Kolenkiewicz, R., Dunn, P. J., Plotkin, H. H., and Johnson, T.S.: 1972, Science 178, pp. 405–406.Google Scholar