Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T20:42:59.408Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Cosmic Dynamo: From t = −∞ to Cowling's Theorem: A Review on History

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 July 2016

F. Krause*
Affiliation:
Alice-Bloch-Str. 14 D-14558 Bergholz-Rehbrücke, Germany

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

An attempt is made to present a review as well on the historical development of knowledge on cosmic magnetic fields as on the development of our understanding of this phenomenon.

Type
11. History
Copyright
Copyright © Kluwer 1993 

References

Alfvén, H., Richtmeyer, R.D., Teller, E.: 1949, Phys. Rev. 75, 1169.Google Scholar
Belopolsky, A.: 1913, Astron. Nachrichten 105, 1.Google Scholar
Biermann, L.: 1951, Zeitschrift für Astrophysik 28, 304.Google Scholar
Biermann, L.: 1952, Annalen der Physik 10, 28.Google Scholar
Bracewell, R.N., Cooper, B.F.C., Cousins, T.E.: 1962, Nature 195, 1286.Google Scholar
Bullard, E.C.: 1949, Proc. Roy. Soc. A 197, 433.Google Scholar
Bullard, E.C., Gellman, H.: 1954, Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. A 247, 213.Google Scholar
Carrington, R.C.: 1863, Observations of the Spots on the Sun , London Google Scholar
Chapman, S., Bartels, J.: 1940, Geomagnetism , Oxford, At the Clarendon Press Google Scholar
Cook, A.E., Roberts, P.H.: 1970, Proc. Cambridge Phil. Soc. 68, 547.Google Scholar
Cooper, B.F.C., Price, R.M.: 1962, Nature 195, 1084.Google Scholar
Cowling, T.G.: 1934, Monthly Not. Roy. Astr. Soc. 94, 39.Google Scholar
Cowling, T.G.: 1953, in The Sun , ed. Kuiper, G.R., University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Eberhard, G., Schwarzschild, K.: 1913, Sitzungsberichte der Königlich Preussischen Akademie der Wissenschaften , 308.Google Scholar
Eddy, J.A.: 1976, Science 192, 1189.Google Scholar
Einstein, A.: 1924, Verhandlungen der Schweizerischen Naturforschenden Gesellschaft 105, 85.Google Scholar
Elsasser, W.M.: 1946a, Phys. Rev. 69, 106.Google Scholar
Elsasser, W.M.: 1946b, Phys. Rev. 70, 202.Google Scholar
Elsasser, W.M.: 1950, Phys. Rev. 79, 183.Google Scholar
Foerster, W.: 1911, Lebenserinnerungen und Lebenshoffnungen , Verlag Georg Reimer, Berlin.Google Scholar
Frenkel, Ya. I.: 1945, Dokl Akad. Nauk 49, 98.Google Scholar
Gilbert, W.: 1600, De Magnete Magneticisque Corporibus et de Magno Magnete Tellure , London.Google Scholar
Gurevich, L.S., Lebedinskij, A.I.: 1945, Dokl Akad. Nauk 49, 92.Google Scholar
Guthnick, P., Prager, R.: 1918, Veröffentlichungen Königlich Preussische Sternwarte Berlin-Babelsberg II 3, 45.Google Scholar
Halley, E.: 1692, Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. London 17, 468.Google Scholar
Herzenberg, A.: 1958, Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. A 250, 543.Google Scholar
Krause, F., Rädler, K.-H.: 1980, Mean-Field magnetohydrodynamics and Dynamo Theory , Akademie-Verlag Berlin, Pergamon Press Oxford.Google Scholar
Landstreet, J.D.: 1992, Astron. Astrophys. Rev. 4, 35.Google Scholar
Larmor, J.: 1919, Rep. Brit. Assoc. Advanc. Sc. , 159.Google Scholar
Lehmann, I.: 1930, Gerlands Beiträge zur Geophysik 26, 402.Google Scholar
Low, F.J., Wilkinson, I.: 1963, Nature 198, 1158.Google Scholar
Lowrie, W., Alvarez, W.: 1981, Geology 9, 392.Google Scholar
Ludendorff, H.: 1906, Astron. Nachrichten 173, 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ludendorff, H.: 1913, Astron. Nachrichten 195, 369.Google Scholar
Maunder, W.: 1922, Monthly Not. Roy. Astr. Soc. 82, 534.Google Scholar
Mayer, C.H., McCullough, T.P., Slonaker, R.M.: 1962, Astrophys. Journal 67, 581.Google Scholar
Moffatt, H.K.: 1970, J. Fluid Mech. 41, 435.Google Scholar
DeMoidry, J.: 1904, Bulletin Astronomique 21, 1.Google Scholar
Needham, J.: 1959, Science and Civilisation in China 3, Mathematics and the Science of the Heoren and the Earth, Cambridge, At the University Press Google Scholar
Needham, J.: 1962, Science and Civilisation in China 4, Physics and Technology, Part I: Physics, Cambridge, At the University Press.Google Scholar
Parker, E.N.: 1955, Astrophys. J. 122, 293.Google Scholar
Rikitake, T.: 1958, Proc. Cambridge Phil Soc. 54, 89.Google Scholar
Roberts, P.H.: 1991, private communication. Google Scholar
Rüdiger, G.: 1989, Differential Rotation and Stellar Convection: Sun and Solar-type Stars , Akademie-Verlag Berlin 1989, Gordon and Breach Science Publishers 1989.Google Scholar
Schlüter, A., Biermann, L.: 1950, Z. Naturforschung 50, 237.Google Scholar
Schuster, A.: 1912, Proc. Phys. Soc. London 24, 121.Google Scholar
Schwabe, H.: 1844, Astron. Nachrichten 21, 233.Google Scholar
Schwarzschild, K., Eberhard, G.: 1913, Astrophys. J. 38, 292.Google Scholar
Siemens, Werner: 1867, Monatsberichte der Königlich Preussischen Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Berlin , 55.Google Scholar
Siemens, Werner V.: 1889, Lebenserinnerungen , Springer-Verlag Berlin.Google Scholar
Siemens, William: 1880, Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. London A 171, 1071.Google Scholar
Spörer, G.: 1887, Vierteljahresschrift der Astronomischen Gesellschaft 22, 323.Google Scholar
Steenbeck, M., Krause, F., Rädler, K.-H.: 1966, Zeitschrift für Naturforschung 21a, 369.Google Scholar
Steenbeck, M., Kirko, I.M., Gailitis, A., Klavinia, A.P., Krause, F., Laumanis, I.J., Lielausis, O.A.: 1967, Mon. ber. deutschen Akad. Wissensch. Berlin 11, 714 (Dokl. Akad. Nauk 180 (1968), 326; Sov. Phys. Dokl. 13 (1968), 443).Google Scholar
Trümper, J., Pietsch, W., Reppin, C., Voges, W., Staubert, R., Kendziorra, E.: 1978, Astrophys. J. 219, L 105.Google Scholar
Verschuur, G.L.: 1968, Phys. Rev. Lett. 21, 775.Google Scholar
Westerhout, G., Seeger, Ch.L., Brouw, W.N., Tinbergen, J.: 1967, B.A.N. 16, 187.Google Scholar
Wielebinski, R., Shakeshaft, J.S.: 1962, Nature 195, 982.Google Scholar
Wielebinski, R., Shakeshaft, J.S., Pauliny-Toth, I.I.K.: 1962, Observatory 82, 158.Google Scholar
Wilde, H.: 1867, Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. London A 158, 89.Google Scholar
Williams, J.: 1873, Month. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 33, 370.Google Scholar
Wilson, O.C.: 1978, Astrophys. J. 226, 379.Google Scholar
Zilsel, E.: 1941, Journ. of the History of Ideas 2, 1.Google Scholar