Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-14T03:54:24.147Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A comparison of dynamical models of the Andromeda Nebula and the Galaxy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 August 2015

V. C. Rubin
Affiliation:
Department of Terrestrial Magnetism, Carnegie Institution of Washington, Washington, D.C., U.S.A.
W. K. Ford Jr.
Affiliation:
Department of Terrestrial Magnetism, Carnegie Institution of Washington, Washington, D.C., U.S.A.

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

(1) From new radial velocities of 67 H II regions in M 31, rotational velocities and a mass model of M 31 are derived, and compared with the rotation curve and Schmidt mass model of our galaxy. (2) It is shown that in M 31 the distribution of H II regions as identified by Baade agrees with the distribution of neutral hydrogen determined from 21-cm observations. Also, the rotation curve derived from the H II velocities outside of the nucleus is similar to the rotation curve derived from 21-cm H I observations.

Type
Part I/Spiral Structure in Galaxies
Copyright
Copyright © Reidel 1970 

References

Baade, W. and Arp, H. C.: 1964, Astrophys. J. 139, 1027.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Becker, W.: 1964, Z. Astrophys. 58, 202.Google Scholar
Burke, B. F. and Tuve, M. A.: 1964, IAU-URSI Symposium No. 20, p. 183.Google Scholar
Burke, B. F., Turner, K. C., and Tuve, M. A.: 1964, Carnegie Inst. Wash. Year Book 63, p. 341.Google Scholar
Hodge, P. W.: 1969, Astrophys. J. 155, 417.Google Scholar
Kerr, F. J. and Westerhout, G.: 1965, Stars and Stellar Systems 5, 167.Google Scholar
Miller, J. S.: 1968, Astrophys. J. 151, 473.Google Scholar
Münch, G.: 1960, Astrophys. J. 131, 250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oort, J. H.: 1968, in Galaxies and the Universe (ed. by Woltjer, L.), Columbia University Press, New York, p. 1.Google Scholar
Pooley, G. G. and Kenderdine, S.: 1967, Nature 214, 1190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, M.: 1966, Astrophys. J. 144, 639.Google Scholar
Roberts, M.: 1968, in Interstellar Ionized Hydrogen (ed. by Terzian, Y.), Benjamin, New York, p. 617.Google Scholar
Rougoor, G. W.: 1964, Bull. Astron. Inst. Netherl. 17, 381.Google Scholar
Rougoor, G. W. and Oort, J. H.: 1960, Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 46, 1.Google Scholar
Rubin, V. C. and Ford, W. K. Jr.: 1970, Astrophys. J. 159.Google Scholar
Schmidt, M.: 1965, Stars and Stellar Systems 5, 513.Google Scholar
Shane, W. W. and Bieger-Smith, G. P.: 1966, Bull. Astron. Inst. Neth. 18, 263.Google Scholar
Westerhout, G.: 1968, in Interstellar Ionized Hydrogen (ed. by Terzian, Y.), W. A. Benjamin, Inc., New York, p. 638.Google Scholar
Woltjer, L.: 1965, Stars and Stellar Systems 5, 531.Google Scholar