Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T03:36:13.911Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Center for Astrophysics Redshift Survey: Luminosity Function and Two-Point Correlation Function

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 August 2017

Valérie de Lapparent
Affiliation:
Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, 60 Garden Street, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA
Margaret J. Geller
Affiliation:
Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, 60 Garden Street, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA
John P. Huchra
Affiliation:
Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, 60 Garden Street, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

We compare the luminosity function and the two-point spatial correlation function for the two slices of the CfA redshift survey extension to mB(0) ≤ 15.5 [8h ≤ RA. ≤ 17h and 26.5° ≤ DEC. ≤ 38.5°], with those for the early survey limited to mB(0) ≤ 14.5 [bII ≥ 40°, and DEC. ≥ 0°]. The derived properties of the two samples agree within the errors. The parameters of the luminosity function are M* = −19.1±0.1 and α = −1.2±0.1 for the 15.5 sample, and M* = −19.3±0.1 and α = −1.1 ± 0.1 for the 14.5 sample. We use an inhomogeneity-independent method to calculate the luminosity function. The slopes of the correlation functions for the two samples are −1.5 ± 0.35, shallower than the canonical slope of −1.8. The correlation lengths are 7.5 ± 5h−1 Mpc, larger than the correlation length of 5h−1 Mpc matched to the theoretical models. Because of the 25% uncertainty in the mean density of the 15.5 sample, the correlation function is indeterminate on scales larger than ∼ 20h−1 Mpc.

Type
Appendix 1: Poster Papers
Copyright
Copyright © Reidel 1988 

References

1 Geller, M. J., Huchra, J. P., and de Lapparent, V. 1987, in Observational Cosmology (A. Hewitt et al. editors), IAU Symp. 124 (Dordrecht: D. Reidel), 301.Google Scholar
2 Huchra, J., Davis, M., Latham, D., and Tonry, J. 1982, Ap. J. Suppl., 52, 89.Google Scholar
3 Lynden-Bell, D. 1971, Mon. Not. Roy. Astr. Soc, 155, 95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4 Turner, E. L. 1979, Ap. J., 231, 645.Google Scholar
5 de Lapparent, V., Geller, M. J., and Huchra, J. P. 1987, Ap. J., submitted.Google Scholar
6 Davis, M. and Peebles, P. J. E. 1983, Ap. J., 267, 465.Google Scholar
7 Frenk, C. S., White, S. D. M., and Davis, M. 1983, Ap. J., 271, 417.Google Scholar
8 Centrella, J., and Melott, A. L. 1983, Nature, 305, 196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9 Davis, M., Efstathiou, G., Frenk, C. S., and White, S. D. M. 1985, Ap. J., 292, 371.Google Scholar