Hostname: page-component-cc8bf7c57-llmch Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-12T08:00:34.166Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Case Studies of Mass Transfer and Star Formation in Galaxy Collisions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 May 2016

Curtis Struck
Curtis Struck*
Affiliation:
Dept. of Physics & Astronomy, Iowa State Univ., Ames, IA 50011, USA

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The amount, timing and ultimate location of mass transfer and induced star formation in galaxy collisions are sensitive functions of orbital and galaxy structural parameters. I discuss the role of detailed case studies and describe the results for two systems, Arp 284 and NGC 2207/IC 2163, that have been studied with both multiwaveband observations, and detailed dynamical models. The models yield the mass transfer and compressional histories of the encounters and the “probable causes” or triggers of individual star-forming regions.

Type
Part 3. Ejection and Outflow
Information
Symposium - International Astronomical Union , Volume 217: Recycling Intergalactic and Interslettar Matter , 2004 , pp. 400 - 405
Copyright
Copyright © Astronomical Society of the Pacific 2004 

References

Appleton, P. N., & Struck, C. 1996, Fund. Cos. Phys., 16, 111.Google Scholar
Barnes, J. E., & Hernquist, L. 1992, ARA&A, 30, 705.Google Scholar
Barton, E. J., Geller, M. J., & Kenyon, S. J. 2000, ApJ, 530, 660.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barton Gillespie, E., Geller, M. J., & Kenyon, S. J. 2003, ApJ, 582, 668.Google Scholar
Bergvall, N., Laurikainen, E., & Aalto, S. 2003, A&A, 405, 31.Google Scholar
Elmegreen, B. G., et al. 1995a, ApJ, 453, 139.Google Scholar
Elmegreen, B. G., et al. 2000, AJ, 120, 630.Google Scholar
Elmegreen, D. M., et al. 1995b, ApJ, 453, 100.Google Scholar
Elmegreen, D. M., et al. 2001, AJ, 121, 182.Google Scholar
Elmegreen, D. M., et al. 1991, A&A, 244, 52.Google Scholar
Howard, S., Keel, W. C., Byrd, G., & Burkey, J. 1993, ApJ, 417, 502.Google Scholar
Kaufman, M., et al. 1997, AJ, 114, 2323.Google Scholar
Keel, W. C. 1993, AJ, 106, 1771.Google Scholar
Keel, W. C., et al. 1985, ApJ, 90, 708.Google Scholar
Kennicutt, R. C. Jr., et al. 1987, AJ, 93, 1011.Google Scholar
Lançon, A., et al. 2001, ApJ, 552, 150.Google Scholar
Larson, R. B., & Tinsley, B. M. 1978, ApJ, 219, 46.Google Scholar
Schombert, J. M., Wallin, J. F., & Struck-Marcell, C. 1990, AJ, 99, 497.Google Scholar
Smith, B. J., Struck, C., & Pogge, R. W. 1997, ApJ, 483, 754.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, B. J., & Wallin, J. F. 1992, ApJ, 393, 544.Google Scholar
Struck, C. 1997, ApJS, 113, 269.Google Scholar
Struck, C. 1999, Physics Reports, 321, 1.Google Scholar
Struck, C., & Smith, B. J. 2003, ApJ, 589, 157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Toomre, A., & Toomre, J. 1972, ApJ, 178, 623.Google Scholar
Wallin, J. F., & Stuart, B. V. 1992, ApJ, 399, 29.Google Scholar