Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-12T15:52:18.885Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Butcher-Oemler Effect in Nearby Clusters

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 May 2016

R.M. Sharples
R.M. Sharples*
Affiliation:
University of Durham, Department of Physics, South Road, Durham, UK

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Probably the most striking evidence for galaxy evolution at recent epochs has been the discovery of a rapid change in the nature of galaxy populations in clusters over the redshift range z=0 to z=0.5. The ‘classical’ Butcher-Oemler effect (Butcher & Oemler 1978, 1984) used photomteric studies to reveal an unexpected increase in the fraction of blue galaxies in the cores of distant (z∼ 0.4) rich concentrated clusters when compared with nearby (z< 0.05) clusters of similarly high richness and central concentration. An alternative view, based on spectroscopic studies (Dressier & Gunn 1982; Couch & Sharpies 1987), manifests itself as an increase in the fraction of active galaxies which show signs of recent star formation and/or nuclear activity. Some of these galaxies are indeed blue but some (e.g. in C10016+16, Dressier & Gunn 1992) are red. Although it is the very absence of blue galaxies in nearby clusters which defines the classical Butcher-Oemler effect, comparable spectroscopic studies of nearby cluster populations with the appropriate completeness and high signal-to-noise required for population (as opposed to dynamical) studies have only recently been undertaken. In at least one case these have revealed unexpected similarities to the spectroscopic signatures which appear so prevalent at higher redshifts.

Type
Mergers in the Local Universe
Information
Symposium - International Astronomical Union , Volume 171: New Light on Galaxy Evolution , 1996 , pp. 199 - 202
Copyright
Copyright © Kluwer 1996 

References

Bower, R.G., Ellis, R.S., Rose, J.A. and Sharpies, R.M. (1990) AJ, Vol. no. 99, p. 530 Google Scholar
Briel, U.G, Henry, J.P. and Bohringer, H. (1992) A&A, Vol. no. 259, p. L31 Google Scholar
Burns, J.O., Roettiger, K., Ledlow, M. and Klypin, A. (1994) ApJ, Vol. no. 427, p. L87 Google Scholar
Butcher, H.R. and Oemler, A. (1978) ApJ, Vol. no. 219, p. 18 Google Scholar
Butcher, H.R. and Oemler, A. (1984) ApJ, Vol. no. 285, p. 426 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caldwell, C.N., Rose, J.A., Franx, M., and Leonardi, A. (1995) Preprint Google Scholar
Caldwell, C.N., Rose, J.A., Sharpies, R.M., Ellis, R.S., and Bower, R.G. (1994) AJ, Vol. no. 106, p. 473 Google Scholar
Couch, W.J. and Sharpies, R.M. (1987) MNRAS, Vol. no. 229, p. 42 Google Scholar
Davies, R.L. (1995) in, New light on Galaxy Evolution, IAU 171, p. XXX.Google Scholar
Dressier, A. and Gunn, J.E. (1982) ApJ, Vol. no. 263, p. 533 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dressier, A. and Gunn, J.E. (1992) ApJSupp, Vol. no. 78, p. 1 Google Scholar
Evrard, A.E. (1991) MNRAS, Vol. no. 248, p. 8P Google Scholar
Leonardi, A. and Rose, J.A. (1995) Preprint Google Scholar
Moore, B. (1995) in, New light on Galaxy Evolution, IAU 171. p. XXX.Google Scholar
O'Connell, R. (1980) ApJ, Vol. no. 236, p. 430 Google Scholar
Rose, J.A. (1985) AJ, Vol. no. 90, p. 1927 CrossRefGoogle Scholar