Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T03:59:25.579Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Background Radiation: Probes and Future Tests

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 May 2016

Martin J. Rees
Martin J. Rees*
Affiliation:
Institute of Astronomy, Madingley Road, Cambridge, CB3 0HA

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The clearest evidence for the ‘hot big bang’ is of course the microwave background radiation. Its spectrum is now known, from the FIRAS experiment on COBE, to be a very precise black body – indeed, the deviations due to high-z activity, hot intergalactic gas, etc are smaller than many people might have expected. Also the light element abundances have remained concordant with the predictions of big bang nucleosynthesis, thereby giving us confidence in extrapolating back to when the universe was a few seconds old (see Copi, Schramm and Turner 1994 for a recent review). These developments give us grounds for greater confidence in this model than would have been warranted ten years ago. Several things could have happened which would have refuted the picture, but they haven't happened. For instance:

  1. (i) Objects could have been found where the helium abundance was far below 23 per cent.

  2. (ii) The background spectrum at millimetre wavelengths could have been weaker than a black body with temperature chosen to fit the Rayleigh-Jeans part of the spectrum.

  3. (iii) A stable neutrino might have been discovered in the mass range 100eV-1MeV.

Type
Part I: Invited Reviews
Information
Symposium - International Astronomical Union , Volume 168: Examining the Big Bang and the Diffuse Background Radiations , 1996 , pp. 389 - 398
Copyright
Copyright © Kluwer 1996 

References

Carr, B.J., Bond, J.R. and Arnett, W.D. 1984, Ap.J., 277, 455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Copi, E., Schramm, D.N. and Turner, M.S. 1994, Science (in press).Google Scholar
Einasto, J., Kaasik, A. and Saar, E. 1974, Nature, 250, 309.Google Scholar
Ellis, R.S., Kneib, J.P. and Smail, I. 1994, Ap.J. (in press).Google Scholar
Gott, J.R., Gunn, J.E., Schramm, D.N. and Tinsley, B. 1974, Ap.J., 194, 543.Google Scholar
Kahn, F.D. and Woltjer, L.W. 1959. Ap.J., 130, 703.Google Scholar
Ostriker, J.P., Peebles, P.J.E. and Yahil, A. 1994, Ap.J. (Lett.), 193, L1.Google Scholar
Rees, M.J. 1994 in “Cosmical Magnetism” ed. Lynden-Bell, D., p155 (Kluwer, Dordrecht).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Songalia, A., Cowie, L.L., Hogan, C.J. and Rugers, M. 1994, Nature, 368, 599.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, D.A. and Fabian, A.C. 1994, MNRAS (in press).Google Scholar
White, S.D.M. et al. 1993, Nature, 366, 429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zeldovich, Y.B., Ruzmaikin, A.A., and Sokolov, D.D. 1983, “Magnetic Fields in Astrophysics”, Gordon and Breach.Google Scholar