No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
An Assessment of the Accuracy of the Deep Space Network Extragalactic Reference Frame
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 07 August 2017
Abstract
Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
The Deep Space Network (DSN) Radio Reference Frame consists of a catalog of angular positions for 281 extragalactic radio sources based on VLBI measurements made during the period from 1978 to 1992. A realistic assessment of the accuracy of these source position estimates must consider both modeled stochastic errors and systematic model deficiencies. Modeled stochastic errors include thermal noise (signal-to-noise ratio) and fluctuations in tropospheric refractivity due to the changing distribution of water vapor. These modeled errors result in a median formal position uncertainty of ≈0.3 milliarcseconds (mas). In particular, we examine the effect of changing the model for inter-observation correlations of water vapor fluctuations on estimated parameters. Next, a comparison of our radio source positions with independently determined positions is presented as evidence of systematic errors at ≤ 0.5 mas. We discuss several aspects of VLBI model accuracy focussing on tidal effects, antenna thermal expansion, pressure loading, source structure, precession and nutation. Prospects for reducing these errors are also discussed. We conclude by combining these estimates of modeled stochastic errors and systematic errors into an overall assessment of < 1.0 mas for the current accuracy of the DSN extragalactic radio frame.
- Type
- Very Long Baseline Interferometry (VLBI)
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Kluwer
References
Bartel, N., Herring, T.A., Ratner, M.I., Shapiro, I.I., and Corey, B.E., “VLBI Limits on the Proper Motion of the Core of the Superluminal Quasar 3C 345”, Nature, vol. 319, pp. 733–738, 1986.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Border, J.S., Donivan, F.F., Finley, S.G., Hildebrand, C.E., Moultrie, B., and Skjerve, L.J., AIAA Paper 82-1471, presented at the 1982 AIAA Conference, San Diego, Ca, August
1982.Google Scholar
Brosche, P., Seiler, U., Sündermann, J., and Wünsch, J., Periodic changes in Earth's rotation due to oceanic tides,
Astron. Astrophys.
, 220, 318–320, 1989.Google Scholar
Büllesfeld, F.-J. and Schuh, H., New harmonic development of the tide-generating potential ETMB 85 with applications on VLBI data analysis,
Proc. X Internatl. Symp. on Earth Tides
, ed. Vieira, R., 933–942, Madrid, 1986.Google Scholar
Chariot, P., Radio source structure in astrometric and geodetic very long baseline interferometry,
Astron. J.
, 99, 1309–1326, 1990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Charlot, P., Sovers, O.J., Williams, J.G., and Newhall, X X, A global VLBI/LLR analysis for the determination of precession and nutation constants,
Proc. of the 127th Colloquium of the IAU, Reference Systems
, 228–233, U. S. Naval Observatory, Washington, D. C., 1991.Google Scholar
Herring, T.A. and Dong, D., “Current and Future Accuracy of Earth Rotation Measurements”,
Proceedings of the AGU Chapman Conference on Geodetic VLBI: Monitoring Global Change
, 306–324, NOAA Tech. Rept. NOS 137 NGS 49, 1991.Google Scholar
International Earth Rotation Service,
“1991 IERS Annual Report”, Observatory of Paris, 1992.Google Scholar
Lanyi, G.E., “Tropospheric Delay Effects in Radio Interferometry”, NASA JPL TDA Prog. Rept. 42–78, pp. 152–159, Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, California, April-June, 1984.Google Scholar
Ma, C., Schaffer, D.B., De Vegt, C., Johnston, K.J., and Russell, J.L., “A Radio Optical Reference Frame I. Precise Radio Source Positions Determined by Mark III VLBI: Observations from 1979 to 1988 and a Tie to the FK5”, Astronomical Journal, vol. 99, pp. 1284–1298, 1990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCarthy, D.D., IERS Standards, IERS Tech. Note 3, International Earth Rotation Service, Paris Observatory, Paris, France, 1989.Google Scholar
Rabbel, W. and Schuh, H., The influence of atmospheric loading on VLBI experiments,
J. Geophysics
, 59, 164–170, 1986.Google Scholar
Scherneck, H.G., “A Parameterised Solid Earth Tide Model and Ocean Tide Loading Effects for Global Geodetic Baseline Measurements”, Geophys. J. Int., vol. 106, pp. 677–694, 1991.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seidelmann, P.K., “1980 IAU Nutation: The Final Report of the IAU Working Group on Nutation”, Celestial Mechanics, vol. 27, pp. 79–106, 1982.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sovers, O.J., Edwards, C.D., Jacobs, C.S., Lanyi, G.E., Liewer, K.M., and Treuhaft, R.N., “Astrometric Results of 1978–1985 Deep Space Network Interferometry: The JPL 1987-1 Extragalactic Source Catalog”, Astronomical Journal, vol. 95, pp. 1647–1658, 1988.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sovers, O.J., “Observation Model and Parameter Partials for the JPL VLBI Parameter Estimation Software “MODEST”-1991”, Publication 83-39, Rev. 4, Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, California, August 1, 1991.Google Scholar
Sovers, O.J., Jacobs, C.S., and Gross, R.S., “Measuring Rapid Ocean Tidal Earth Orientation Variations with VLBI”, submitted to
J. Geophys. Res., November, 1992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Treuhaft, R.N. and Lanyi, G.E., “The Effect of the Dynamic Wet Troposphere on Radio Interferometric Measurements”, Radio Science, vol. 22, pp. 251–265, 1987.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Treuhaft, R.N. and Lowe, S.T., “A Measurement of Planetary Relativistic Deflection”, Astronomical Journal, vol. 102, pp. 1879–1888, 1991.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wahr, J.M., “The Forced Nutations of an Elliptical, Rotating, Elastic, and Oceanless Earth”, Geophys. J. Roy. Astron. Soc., vol. 64, pp. 705–727, 1981.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wünsch, J. and Busshoff, J., “Improved Observations of Oceanic UT1”, Research Note for Astronomy and Astrophysics, in press, accepted 10 July
1992.Google Scholar
Zensus, J.A. and Pearson, T.J., eds., “Superluminal Radio Sources”, Cambridge Univ. Press, New York, New York, 1987.Google Scholar
You have
Access