Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-12T08:40:59.117Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Abundance analyses: methods, results and implications

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 August 2017

P. L. Cottrell
P. L. Cottrell*
Affiliation:
Mount John University Observatory Department of Physics, University of Canterbury Christchurch, New Zealand

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The methods by which abundance analyses can be undertaken, especially with the growing use of high quantum efficiency digital detectors, are reviewed. The importance of the differential curve of growth technique is discussed, followed by a review of some recent results involving both late-type dwarf and giant stars. These include (1) the F and G dwarf abundance analyses of the elements sodium through nickel, which show an important differentiation between stars belonging to the young and old disk populations, (2) the possibility that departures from local thermodynamic equilibrium can effect sodium and aluminium abundances in late-type giants and supergiants and (3) that significant differences exist between the abundances of carbon, nitrogen and oxygen in old disk and young disk giant stars. Finally, the implications of these abundances in terms of stellar and galactic evolution are briefly addressed.

Type
III. Spectroscopic Research Programmes
Information
Symposium - International Astronomical Union , Volume 118: Instrumentation and Research Programmes for Small Telescopes , 1986 , pp. 413 - 424
Copyright
Copyright © Reidel 1986 

References

Arnett, W.D. 1971, Astrophys. J., 166, 153.Google Scholar
Begley, M.J. 1985, , University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand.Google Scholar
Bell, R.A. 1970, Monthly Notices Roy. Astron. Soc., 148, 25.Google Scholar
Brown, J.A., Tomkin, J., and Lambert, D.L. 1983, Astrophys. J. (Letters), 265, L93.Google Scholar
Cayrel de Strobel, G. 1976, in ‘Abundance Effects in Classification’ IAU Symposium No. 72, eds Hauck, B. and Keenan, P.C. (Dordrecht: Reidel), p29.Google Scholar
Cayrel de Strobel, G. 1983, Pub. Astron. Soc. Pacific, 95, 111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clegg, R.E.S., Lambert, D.L., and Tomkin, J. 1981, Astrophys. J., 250, 262, [CLT].Google Scholar
Cottrell, P.L., and Sneden, C. 1986, Astron. Astrophys., in press, [CS].Google Scholar
Dearborn, D., Tinsley, B.M., and Schramm, D.N. 1978, Astrophys. J., 223, 557.Google Scholar
Edvardsson, B., Gustafsson, B., and Nissen, P.E. 1984, The Messenger, 38, 33, [EGN].Google Scholar
Freeman, K.C., and Norris, J. 1981, Ann. Rev. Astron. Astrophys., 19, 319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenstein, J.L. 1948, Astrophys. J., 107, 151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gustafsson, B. 1981, Astrophys. Space Science Library, 88, 25.Google Scholar
Gustafsson, B. 1983, Pub. Astron. Soc. Pacific, 95, 101.Google Scholar
Gustafsson, B., Bell, R.A., Eriksson, K., and Nordlund, A. 1975, Astron. Astrophys., 42, 407.Google Scholar
Hartwick, F.D.A., and McClure, R.D. 1980, Astrophys. J., 235, 470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hearnshaw, J.B. 1972, Mem. Roy. Astron. Soc., 77, 55.Google Scholar
Helfer, H.L., and Wallerstein, G. 1968, Astrophys. J. Suppl., 16, 1.Google Scholar
Kelch, W.L. 1975, Astrophys. J., 195, 679.Google Scholar
Kelch, W.L., and Milkey, R.W. 1976, Astrophys. J., 208, 428.Google Scholar
Kjaergaard, P., Gustafsson, B., Walker, G.A.H., and Hultqvist, L. 1982, Astron. Astrophys., 115, 145, [KGWH].Google Scholar
Kurucz, R.L. 1970, SAO Special Report No. 309.Google Scholar
Kurucz, R.L. 1979, Astrophys. J. Suppl., 40, 1.Google Scholar
Laird, J.B. 1985a, Astrophys. J., 289, 556.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laird, J.B. 1985b, Astrophys. J. Suppl., 57, 387.Google Scholar
Lambert, D.L. 1981, Astrophys. Space Science Library, 88, 115.Google Scholar
Lambert, D.L., and Ries, L.M. 1977, Astrophys. J., 217, 508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lambert, D.L., and Ries, L.M. 1981, Astrophys. J., 248, 228, [LR81].Google Scholar
Langer, G.E., Kraft, R.P., and Friel, E.D. 1985, Pub. Astron. Soc. Pacific, 97, 373.Google Scholar
Pardo, R.C., Couch, R.G., and Arnett, W.D. 1974, Astrophys. J., 191, 711.Google Scholar
Peterson, R. 1981, Astrophys. J., 244, 989.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pickles, A.J. 1985, Astrophys. J., 296, 340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruland, F., Holweger, H., Griffin, R., Griffin, R., and Biehl, D. 1980, Astron. Astrophys. 92, 70.Google Scholar
Scalo, J.M. 1981, Astrophys. Space Science Library, 88, 77.Google Scholar
Sneden, C. 1973, , The University of Texas at Austin.Google Scholar
Spite, M. 1965, Ann. d'Astrophys., 31, 269.Google Scholar
Tinsley, B.M. 1979, Astrophys. J., 229, 1046.Google Scholar
Tinsley, B.M. 1980, Fundamentals Cosmic Physics, 5, 287.Google Scholar
Tomkin, J., Lambert, D.L., and Balachandran, S. 1985, Astrophys. J., 290, 289 [TLB].Google Scholar
Twarog, B.A. 1980a, Astrophys. J. Suppl., 44, 1.Google Scholar
Twarog, B.A. 1980b, Astrophys. J., 242, 242 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Twarog, B.A., and Wheeler, J.C. 1982, Astrophys. J., 261, 636.Google Scholar
Wallerstein, G. 1962, Astrophys. J. Suppl., 6, 407.Google Scholar
Woosley, S.E., and Weaver, T.A. 1982, in ‘Essays in Nuclear Astrophys.’, eds Barnes, C.A., Clayton, D.D., and Schramm, D.N. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press),p377.Google Scholar
Wright, K.O. 1947, Pub. Dominion Astrophys. Obs., 8, 1.Google Scholar
Zinn, R. 1985, Astrophys. J., 293, 424.Google Scholar