Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T04:07:41.454Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The 3-D Distribution of Abell Clusters

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 August 2017

Will Sutherland*
Affiliation:
Institute of Astronomy, Cambridge CB3 0HA, England

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The Struble & Rood catalogue (Ap. J. Supp, 63, 543) of all measured Abell cluster redshifts is analysed, with corrections for the selection biases. This contains 533 redshifts with |b| ≥ 30°, z ≤ 0.3 compared with 104 in the sample of Bahcall & Soneira (Ap. J.270, 20). Although the catalogue contains biases in angular position (redshifts are preferentially measured in apparent “supercluster” regions) the information on redshift clustering is effectively unbiased since one cannot tell a priori whether pairs of clusters close on the sky are really associated in redshift. Thus the distribution of redshift differences for pairs of given angle & distance classes, fz|θ,D1,D2), is a fair sample of the true distribution. Then by normalising to the “correct” angular correlation function, we obtain the joint distribution fz,θ) and hence ξ(r). In practice, in the estimation of ξ we assign each pair a weight a where where wA is the correlation or cross correlation for the appropriate subset of the whole Abell catalogue. This gives ξ(r) ≈ (r/20 h−1Mpc)−1.8, just slightly smaller than the result of Bahcall & Soneira, but here ξ(r) ≈ 0 for r ≥ 50−1Mpc.

Type
Appendix 1: Poster Papers
Copyright
Copyright © Reidel 1988