Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T04:01:12.381Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

25. Orbits of photographic meteors

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 August 2015

R. E. McCrosky
R. E. McCrosky*
Affiliation:
Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory and Harvard College Observatory, Cambridge, Mass., U.S.A.

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

New photographic observations of meteors in the brightness range −5 > Mp > −18 (?) and with a median value of M = −8·5 have yielded orbits with a precision of better than 1° in the angular elements and of about 0·05 in e and 1/a. A comparison of 100 of these fireball orbits with Super-Schmidt orbits shows:

  1. (1) A class of orbits, comprising about 25% of the faint meteors, of long period, is almost completely absent among the fireballs.

  2. (2) Small perihelion distances (q < 0·2 AU) are not found. A maximum at q ~ 0·7 AU, which also appears in the Super-Schmidt orbits of short period, corresponds to the perihelion distances of all but two of the Apollo objects.

  3. (3) The distribution of aphelia shows a marked decrease at Jupiter when compared to a similar distribution of small, faint meteor orbits. With the existing material, we cannot determine whether this represents an important evolutionary distinction between meteoroids of different mass or is simply the result of an inappropriate choice of the division between ‘large’ and ‘small’ orbits in the faint meteor data.

Provisional values of the bulk density of 28 of the fireballs as determined from the photometric mass and the observed mass-area ratio indicate that these meteoroids do not differ significantly from those observed with the Super-Schmidt cameras. Evidence of gross fragmentation of these large objects at high elevation and evidence of small or negligible terminal masses suggest that the material is friable. There is no certain evidence that any appreciable fraction of fireballs is produced by high-density, cohesive material.

If the above analysis is correct, we should expect an occasional (1 year−1 106 km−2?) meteorite fall of discoverable size originating from a low-density meteoroid.

Type
Session 5
Information
Symposium - International Astronomical Union , Volume 33: Physics and Dynamics of Meteors , 1968 , pp. 265 - 279
Copyright
Copyright © Reidel 1968 

References

Babadžanov, P.B., Kramer, E.N. (1967) Smithson. Contr. Astrophys., 11, 67.Google Scholar
Cook, A.F., Jacchia, L.G., McCrosky, R.E. (1963) Smithson. Contr. Astrophys., 7, 209.Google Scholar
Hawkins, G.S., Southworth, R.B. (1961) Smithson. Contr. Astrophys., 4, 85.Google Scholar
Jacchia, L.G. (1958) Smithson. Contr. Astrophys., 2, 181.Google Scholar
Jacchia, L.G., Whipple, F.L. (1961) Smithson. Contr. Astrophys., 4, 97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacchia, L.G., Verniani, F., Briggs, R.E. (1967) Smithson. Contr. Astrophys., 10, 1; also in Smithson. astrophys. Obs. Spec. Rep., 175.Google Scholar
Kresák, Ľ. (1964) Bull. astr. Inst. Csl., 15, 190.Google Scholar
McCrosky, R.E., Boeschenstein, H. (1965) Journ. Soc. Photo-Opt. Instr. Engrs., 3, 127; also in Smithson. astrophys. Obs. Spec. Rep., 173.Google Scholar
McCrosky, R.E., Posen, A. (1961) Smithson. Contr. Astrophys., 4, 15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newton, H.A. (1888) Amer. J. Sci., 36, 1.Google Scholar
Öpik, E.J. (1966) Univ. Liège Inst. astrophys. Coll., 21, 575.Google Scholar
Verniani, F. (1964) Smithson. Contr. Astrophys., 8, 141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whipple, F.L. (1954) Astr. J., 59, 201.Google Scholar
Whipple, F.L. (1967) Geochim. et Cosmochim. Acta, in press.Google Scholar
Whipple, F.L., Hughes, R.F. (1955) Meteors, Spec. Suppl., J. atmos. terr. Phys., 2, 149.Google Scholar