Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-hvd4g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-12T04:13:52.577Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

VOWEL EPENTHESIS AND SEGMENT IDENTITY IN KOREAN LEARNERS OF ENGLISH

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 March 2012

Kenneth de Jong  and
Hanyong Park
Kenneth de Jong
Affiliation:
Indiana University
Hanyong Park
Affiliation:
University of Wisconsin–Milwaukee
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Recent literature has sought to understand the presence of epenthetic vowels after the productions of postvocalic word-final consonants by second language (L2) learners whose first languages (L1s) restrict the presence of obstruents in coda position. Previous models include those in which epenthesis is seen as a strategy to mitigate the effects of coda licensing restrictions in the L1; others see epenthesis as a result of misperception of consonant releases in the L2 as indicating the presence of an additional syllable nucleus. The current study examines segmental identification and syllable counting in inexperienced Korean learners of English as a foreign language. Across stimuli, two effects were found. Increased perceptual epenthesis correlated with increased identification of a segment as voiceless, indicating a joint perception of voicelessness and an epenthetic vowel. Also, rate of epenthesis increased with accuracy of detecting sibilants and coronal segments, sounds characterized by salient consonant noise. Taken together, these results indicate a perceptual mechanism that evaluates segmental content and prosodic structure from an integrated percept. Analyses across individual listeners do not support a model in which perceptual epenthesis is a strategy to increase segmental accuracy; rather, they support models in which both syllable counting and segmental identification are skills that are reflections of increased proficiency in the L2. These results are discussed with respect to models of L2 phonology that rely on the robust encoding of lexical items.

Type
ARTICLES
Information
Studies in Second Language Acquisition , Volume 34 , Issue 1 , March 2012 , pp. 127 - 155
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Abrahamsson, N. (2003). Development and recoverability of L2 codas. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 25, 313–349.Google Scholar
Anderson, J. (1987). The Markedness Differential Hypothesis and syllable structure difficulty. In Ioup, G. & Weinberger, S. H. (Eds.), Interlanguage phonology: The acquisition of a second language sound system (pp. 279–291). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Baptista, B. O., & Silva Filho, J. L. A. (2006). The influence of voicing and sonority relationships on the production of English final consonants. In Baptista, B. O. & Watkins, M. A. (Eds.), English with a Latin beat: Studies in Portuguese/Spanish-English interphonology (pp. 73–89). Amsterdam: Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benson, B. (1988). Universal preference for the open syllables as an independent process in interlanguage phonology. Language Learning, 38, 221–235.Google Scholar
Bettoni-Techio, M., Rauber, A. S., & Koerich, R. D. (2007). Perception and production of word-final alveolar stops by Brazilian Portuguese learners of English. In Proceedings of Interspeech 2007 (pp. 2293–2296). Antwerp, Belgium.Google Scholar
Broselow, E., Chen, S. I., & Wang, C. (1998). The emergence of the unmarked in second language phonology. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 20, 261–280.Google Scholar
Cardoso, W. (2005). The variable acquisition of English word-final stops by Brazilian Portuguese speakers. In Dekydtspotter, L., Sprouse, R. A., & Liljestrand, A. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 7th Generative Approaches to Second Language Acquisition Conference (pp. 38–49). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar
de Jong, K. J., & Cho, M. H. (2011). Loanword phonology and perceptual mapping: Comparing two corpora of Korean contact with English. Manuscript submitted for publication.Google Scholar
de Jong, K. J., Hao, Y. C., & Park, H. (2009). Evidence for featural units in the acquisition of speech production skills: Linguistic structure in foreign accent. Journal of Phonetics, 37, 357–373.Google Scholar
de Jong, K. J., Silbert, N. H., & Park, H. (2009). Generalization across segments in second language consonant identification. Language Learning, 59, 1–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Detey, S., & Nespoulous, J. L. (2008). Can orthography influence second language syllabic segmentation? Japanese epenthetic vowels and French consonantal clusters. Lingua, 118, 66–81.Google Scholar
Dupoux, E., Kakehi, K., Hirose, Y., Pallier, C., & Mehler, J. (1998). Epenthetic vowels in Japanese: A perceptual illusion? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25, 1568–1578.Google Scholar
Erickson, D., Tajima, K., & Nagao, K. (2000). Phonetic analysis of vowel epenthesis in native Japanese speakers’ production of English words. Gifu City Women’s College Research Bulletin, 50, 73–78.Google Scholar
Fleischhacker, H. (2001). Cluster-dependent epenthesis asymmetries. UCLA Working Papers in Linguistics, 7, 71–116.Google Scholar
Goad, H., & Brannen, K. (2003). Phonetic evidence for phonological structure in syllabification. In van de Weijer, J., van Heuven, V., & van der Hulst, H. (Eds.), The phonological spectrum (Vol. 2, pp. 3–30). Amsterdam: Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goad, H., & Kang, H. S. (2003). Word-final syllabification in L2 acquisition with emphasis on Korean learners of English. In Liceras, J. M., Zobl, H., & Goodluck, H. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 6th Generative Approaches to Second Language Acquisition Conference (pp. 122–129). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar
Grimes, S. (2010). Quantitative investigations in Hungarian phonotactics and syllable structure. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Indiana University, Bloomington.Google Scholar
Guion, S. G., & Pederson, E. (2007). Investigating the role of attention in phonetic learning. In Bohn, O.-S. & Munro, M. (Eds.), Language experience in second language speech learning (pp. 57–77). Amsterdam: Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hancin-Bhatt, B. (2000). Optimality in second-language phonology: Codas in Thai ESL. Second Language Research, 16, 201–232.Google Scholar
Hancin-Bhatt, B., & Bhatt, R. M. (1997). Optimal L2 syllables: Interactions of transfer and developmental effects. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19, 331–378.Google Scholar
Hansen, J. G. (2001). Linguistic constraints on the acquisition of English syllable codas by native speakers of Mandarin Chinese. Applied Linguistics, 22, 338–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jeffers, R. J., & Lehiste, I. (1979). Principles and methods for historical linguistics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Jun, S. A., & Beckman, M. E. (1994). Distribution of devoiced high vowels in Korean. Proceedings of the International Conference on Spoken Language Processing, 2, 479–482.Google Scholar
Kim-Renaud, Y. K. (1977). Syllable boundary phenomena in Korean. Korean Studies, 1, 243–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koerich, R. D. (2006). Perception and production of vowel paragoge by Brazilian EFL students. In Baptista, B. O. & Watkins, M. A. (Eds.), English with a Latin beat: Studies in Portuguese/Spanish-English interphonology (pp. 91–104). Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar
Lee, Y., & Goldrick, M. (2008). The emergence of sub-syllabic representations. Journal of Memory and Language, 59, 155–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lim, B. J. (2003). Perception, production, and orthography in syllabification in Korean and English. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Indiana University, Bloomington.Google Scholar
Macmillan, N. A., & Creelman, D. C. (2005). Detection theory: A user’s guide (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Malécot, A. (1958). The role of releases in the identification of released final stops. Language, 34, 370–380.Google Scholar
Osburne, A. G. (1996). Final cluster reduction in English L2 speech: A case study of a Vietnamese speaker. Applied Linguistics, 17, 164–181.Google Scholar
Park, H. (2007). Varied adaptation patterns of English stops and fricatives in Korean loanwords: The influence of the P-map. IULC Working Papers Online, 7, 01.Google Scholar
Park, H., & de Jong, K. J. (2006). Native Koreans’ perception of voicing in VC position: Prosodic restructuring effects on consonant identification. IULC Working Papers Online, 6, 04.Google Scholar
Pederson, E., & Guion-Anderson, S. (2010). Orienting attention during phonetic learning facilitates learning. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 127, EL54–EL59.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pennington, M. C., & Ku, P. Y. (1993). Realizations of English final stops by Chinese speakers in Taiwan. RELC Journal, 24, 29–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peperkamp, S., Vendelin, I., & Nakamura, K. (2008). On the perceptual origin of loanword adaptations: Experimental evidence from Japanese. Phonology, 25, 129–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sato, C. J. (1984). Phonological processes in second language acquisition: Another look at interlanguage syllable structure. Language Learning, 34, 43–57.Google Scholar
Silverman, D. (1996). Phonology at the interface of morphology and phonetics: Root-final laryngeals in Chong, Korean, and Sanskrit. Journal of East Asian Linguistics, 6, 1–22.Google Scholar
Steele, J. (2004). Position-sensitive licensing asymmetries and developmental paths in L2 acquisition. In Dekydtspotter, L., Sprouse, R. A., & Liljestrand, A. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 7th Generative Approaches to Second Language Acquisition Conference (pp. 226–237). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar
Stevens, K. N. (2000). Acoustic phonetics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tajima, K., Port, R. F., & Dalby, J. (1997). Effects of temporal correction on intelligibility of foreign-accented English. Journal of Phonetics, 25, 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tarone, E. (1972). A suggested unit for interlingual identification in pronunciation. TESOL Quarterly, 6, 325–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tarone, E. (1980). Some influences on the syllable structure of interlanguage phonology. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 18, 139–152.Google Scholar
Tarone, E. (1984). The role of the syllable in interlanguage phonology. In Eliasson, S. (Ed.), Theoretical Issues in Contrastive Phonology (pp. 63–72). Heidelberg: Julius Groos Verlag.Google Scholar
Tsukada, K., Birdsong, D., Mack, M., Sung, H., Bialystok, E., & Flege, J. E. (2004). Release bursts in English word-final voiceless stops produced by native English and Korean adults and children. Phonetica, 61, 67–83.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Weinberger, S. (1987). The influence of linguistic context on syllable simplification. In Ioup, G. & Weinberger, S. (Eds.), Interlanguage phonology: The acquisition of a second language sound system (pp. 401–417). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Yoon, Y. B., & Derwing, B. (2001). A language without a rhyme: Syllable structure experiments in Korean. Canadian Journal of Linguistics, 46, 187–237.Google Scholar