Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-b6zl4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-27T07:26:01.675Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Theory of Language Acquisition Is Not So Easy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 November 2008

Wolfgang Klein
Wolfgang Klein
Affiliation:
Max-Planck-Institut für Psycholinguistik
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The first part of this commentary discusses the minimal requirements that any serious theory of language acquisition must meet. It must take into account the particular properties of the human language processor and the (linguistic and nonlinguistic) input, as well as the specific motivation which causes the learner to apply the former to the latter. Neglecting, or even not keeping constant, some of these factors leads to a very distorted picture of the nature of language acquisition. In particular, claims about the difference between first (L1) and second language (L2) acquisition that ignore major variation in one of these components go astray.

Type
Commentraies
Information
Studies in Second Language Acquisition , Volume 12 , Issue 2 , June 1990 , pp. 219 - 231
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bhardwaj, M., Dietrich, R., & Noyau, C. (Eds.). (1988). Second language acquisition by adult immigrants: Final report (Vol. 75). Strasbourg: ESF.Google Scholar
Becker, A., Carroll, M., & Kelly, A. (Eds.). (1988). Second language acquisition by adult immigrants: Final report (Vol. 4). Strasbourg: ESF.Google Scholar
Bremer, K., Broeder, P., Roberts, C, Simonot, M., & Vasseur, M.-T. (Eds.). (1988). Second language acquisition by adult immigrants: Final report (Vol. 1) Strasbourg: ESF.Google Scholar
Gasser, M. (1988). A connectionist model of sentence generation in a first and second language (Technical report UCLA-A–88–13). Los Angeles: Computer Science Department.Google Scholar
Klein, W. (1986). Second language acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klein, W., & Perdue, C. (1988). Second language acquisition by adult immigrants: Final report (Vol. 4). Strasbourg: ESF.Google Scholar
Klein, W., & Perdue, C. (in press). The learner's problem of arranging words. In MacWhinney, B. & Bates, E. (Eds.), The cross-linguistic study of sentence processing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Klein, W., & Rieck, B. O. (1982). Der Erwerb der Personalpronomina im ungesteuerten Spracherwerb. In Klein, W. & Weissenborn, J. (Eds.), Zweitspracherwerb (pp. 35–71). Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.Google Scholar
Klein, W., & von Stutterheim, C. (1985). Text structure and referential movement. Unpublished manuscript, Max-Planck lnstitut, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.Google Scholar
Levelt, W. J. M. (1989). Speaking: From intention to articulation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Pinker, S., & Prince, A. (1988). On language and connectionism: Analysis of a parallel distributed processing model of language acquisition. Cognition, 28, 73–193.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rumelhart, D. E., & McClelland, J. L. (1986). Parallel distributed processing: Explorations in the microstructure of cognition (Vol. 1). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slobin, D. I. (1985). The cross-linguistic study of language acquisition (Vols. 1–2). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Tomlin, R. S. (1989). Focal attention, activated memory and the referential management of discourse production. Eugene: University of Oregon, Department of Linguistics.Google Scholar
Von Stutterheim, C, & Klein, W. (1987). A concept-oriented approach to second language studies. In Pfaff, C. W. (Ed.), First and second language acquisition processes (pp. 191–205). Cambridge, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Von Stutterheim, C, & Klein, W. (1989). Referential movement in descriptive and narrative discourse. In Dietrich, R. & Graumann, C. F. (Eds.), Language processing in social context (pp. 39–76). Amsterdam: North-Holland.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, L. (1988). Island effects in second language acquisition. In Flynn, S. & O'Neill, W. (Eds.), Linguistic theory in second language acquisition (pp. 144–172). Dordrecht: Foris.CrossRefGoogle Scholar