Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-grxwn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-12T10:20:22.689Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

SECOND- AND FOREIGN-LANGUAGE VARIATION IN TENSE BACKSHIFTING IN INDIRECT REPORTED SPEECH

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 February 2011

Krassimira D. Charkova  and
Laura J. Halliday
Krassimira D. Charkova*
Affiliation:
Southern Illinois University at Carbondale
Laura J. Halliday*
Affiliation:
Southern Illinois University at Carbondale
*
*Address correspondence to: Krassimira Charkova, Department of Linguistics, Southern Illinois University, 1000 Faner Ave., Carbondale, IL 62901; e-mail: [email protected]; or Laura Halliday, Department of Linguistics, Southern Illinois University, 1000 Faner Ave., Carbondale, IL 62901; e-mail: [email protected].
*Address correspondence to: Krassimira Charkova, Department of Linguistics, Southern Illinois University, 1000 Faner Ave., Carbondale, IL 62901; e-mail: [email protected]; or Laura Halliday, Department of Linguistics, Southern Illinois University, 1000 Faner Ave., Carbondale, IL 62901; e-mail: [email protected].
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This study examined how English learners in second-language (SL) and foreign-language (FL) contexts employ tense backshifting in indirect reported speech. Participants included 35 international students in the United States, 37 Bulgarian speakers of English, 38 Bosnian speakers of English, and 41 native English speakers. The instrument involved speech scenarios in two time settings—immediate and delayed report—and questions about the participants’ reasons for backshifting tenses or not. The results revealed that FL environments foster the acquisition of backshifting as an automatically applicable grammatical rule, whereas SL contexts facilitate awareness of pragmatic and semantic aspects of tense backshifting.

Type
Research Articles
Information
Studies in Second Language Acquisition , Volume 33 , Issue 1 , March 2011 , pp. 1 - 32
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Akai, S. (2007). Enhancing teaching and learning speech acts: Action research of Japanese as a foreign language. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Brock University, Canada.Google Scholar
Ayoun, D., & Salaberry, M. R. (2008). Acquisition of English tense-aspect morphology by advanced French instructed learners. Language Learning, 58, 555–584.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bardovi-Harlig, K. (1999). Exploring the interlanguage of interlanguage pragmatics: A research agenda for acquisitional pragmatics. Language Learning, 49, 677–713.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bardovi-Harlig, K. (2001). Evaluating the empirical evidence: Grounds for instruction in pragmatics? In Rose, K. R. & Kasper, G. (Eds.), Pragmatics in language teaching (pp. 13–32). New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bardovi-Harlig, K., & Dörnyei, Z. (1998). Do language learners recognize pragmatic violations? Pragmatic vs. grammatical awareness in instructed L2 learning. TESOL Quarterly, 32, 233–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bardovi-Harlig, K., & Griffin, R. (2005). L2 pragmatic awareness: Evidence from the ESL classroom. System, 33, 401–415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bardovi-Harlig, K., & Hartford, B. S. (1996). Input in an institutional setting. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 17, 171–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bland, K. S. (2008). Grammar sense: Advanced grammar and writing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Blum-Kulka, S., & Olshtain, E. (1986). Too many words: Length of utterance and pragmatic failure. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 8, 165–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Celce-Murcia, M., & Larsen-Freeman, D. (1999). The grammar book: An ESL/EFL teacher’s course (2nd ed.). Boston: Heinle & Heinle.Google Scholar
Comrie, B. (1985). Tense. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Comrie, B. (1986). Tense in indirect speech. Folia Linguistica, 20, 265–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Declerck, R. (1990). Sequence of tenses in English. Folia Linguistica, 24, 513–544.Google Scholar
Declerck, R. (1999). Remarks on Salkie and Reed’s (1997) ‘pragmatic hypothesis’ of tense in reported speech. English Language and Linguistics, 3, 83–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Declerck, R., & Tanaka, K. (1996). Constraints on tense choice in reported speech. Studia Linguistica, 50, 283–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Félix-Brasdefer, J. C. (2004). Interlanguage refusals: Linguistic politeness and length of residence in the target community. Language Learning, 54, 587–658.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Firsten, R., & Killian, P. (2002). The ELT grammar book. Provo, UT: Alta Book Center.Google Scholar
George, D., & Mallery, P. (2009). SPSS for windows step by step: A simple guide and reference (9th ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
Goodell, E. W. (1987). Integrating theory with practice: An alternative approach to reported speech in English. TESOL Quarterly, 21, 305–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graver, B. D. (1971). Advanced English practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Greenberg, R. D. (2004). Language and identity in the Balkans: Serbo-Croatian and its disintegration. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gvozdanović, J. (1996). Reported speech in South Slavic. In Janssen, Th. A. J. M. & . Wurff, W. v. d (Eds.), Reported speech: Forms and functions of the verb (pp. 57–71). Amsterdam: Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haines, S., & Stewart, B. (2004). First certificate master class: Student’s book. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hornstein, N. H. (1990). As time goes by. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Jespersen, O. (1924). The philosophy of grammar. London: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Kasper, G. (1996). Interlanguage pragmatics in SLA. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 18, 145–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kasper, G. (1997). The role of pragmatics in language teacher education. In Bardovi-Harlig, K. & Hartford, B. S. (Eds.), Beyond methods: Components of language teacher education (pp. 113–136). New York: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
Kasper, G. (2001). Classroom research on interlanguage pragmatics. In Rose, K. R. & Kasper, G. (Eds.), Pragmatics in language teaching (pp. 30–60). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kasper, G., & Rose, K. R. (2002). Pragmatic development in a second language. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Kasper, G., & Schmidt, R. (1996). Developmental issues in interlanguage pragmatics. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 18, 149–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirk, R. E. (1995). Experimental design: Procedures for the behavioral sciences. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.Google Scholar
Koike, D. A., & Pearson, L. (2005). The effect of instruction and feedback in the development of pragmatic competence. System, 33, 481–501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leech, G., & Svartvik, J. (1975). A communicative grammar of English. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Niezgoda, K., & Röver, C. (2001). Pragmatic and grammatical awareness. In Rose, K. R. & Kasper, G. (Eds.), Pragmatics in language teaching (pp. 63–79). New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norris, R. (2008). Ready for CAE: Course book. Oxford: Macmillan Exams.Google Scholar
Olshtain, E., & Blum-Kulka, S. (1985). Degree of approximation: Nonnative reactions to native speech act behavior. In Gass, S. M. & Madden, C. (Eds.), Input in second language acquisition (pp. 303–325). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Palmer, F. R. (1988). The English verb. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Quirk, R., Greenbaum, S., Leech, G., & Svartvik, J. (1985). A comprehensive grammar of the English language. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Riddle, E. (1978). Sequence of tenses in English. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.Google Scholar
Riddle, E. (1986). The meaning and discourse function of the past tense in English. TESOL Quarterly, 20, 267–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rose, K. R. (2005). On the effects of instruction in second language pragmatics. System, 33, 385–399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salkie, R., & Reed, S. (1997). Time reference in reported speech. English Language and Linguistics, 1, 319–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schauer, G. A. (2006). Pragmatic awareness in ESL and EFL contexts: Contrast and development. Language Learning, 56, 269–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Soler, E. A. (2005). Does instruction work for learning pragmatics in the EFL context? System, 33, 417–435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
SPSS for Windows (Version 14.0) [Computer software]. (2005). Chicago: SPSS.Google Scholar
Standwell, G. (1985). Reported speech: Backshifting and the markedness principle. British Journal of Language Teaching, 23, 149–151.Google Scholar
Stein, A. (1982). Speaker attitudes in reported speech. Unpublished master’s thesis, University of California, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
Steinbergs, A. (2005). The classification of languages. In O’Grady, W., Archibald, J., Aronoff, M., & Rees-Miller, J. (Eds.), Contemporary linguistics (pp. 291–324). Boston: Bedford/St. Martin’s.Google Scholar
Swan, M. (1980). Practical English usage. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Takahashi, S. (2005). Noticing in task performance and learning outcomes: A qualitative analysis of instructional effects in interlanguage pragmatics. System. 33, 437–461.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thewlis, S. (2007). Grammar dimensions: Form, meaning, and use (Book 3). Boston: Heinle & Heinle.Google Scholar
Thomson, A. J., & Martinet, A. V. (1980). A practical English grammar (3rd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Vince, M., & Sunderland, P. (2003). Advanced language practice: English grammar and vocabulary. Oxford: Macmillan Education.Google Scholar
Warner, R. M. (2008). Applied statistics: From bivariate through multivariate techniques. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar