Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-v2bm5 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-27T07:51:52.759Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Search for Universal Operating Principles in Language Acquisition

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 November 2008

Csaba Pléh
Csaba Pléh
Affiliation:
Loránd Eötvös University, Budapest
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Review Article
Information
Studies in Second Language Acquisition , Volume 12 , Issue 2 , June 1990 , pp. 233 - 241
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bates, E., & MacWhinney, B. (1982). Functionalist approaches to grammar. In Wanner, E. & Gleitman, L. R. (Eds.), Language acquisition: The state of the art (pp. 173–218). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bickerton, D. (1981). Roots of language. Ann Arbor, MI: Karoma.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1981). Lectures on government and binding. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Ferguson, C. A., & Slobin, D. (Eds.). (1973). Studies of child language development. New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.Google Scholar
Huxley, T, & Ingram, E. (Eds.). (1971). Language acquisition: Models and methods. London: Academic.Google Scholar
Krashen, S. (1975). The critical period for language acquisition and its possible bases. In Aaronson, D. & Rieber, R. W. (Eds.), Developmental psycholinguistics and communication disorders. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 263, 211–224.Google Scholar
Krashen, S. (1985). The input hypothesis. New York: Longman.Google Scholar
Lenneberg, E. (1967). Biological foundations of language. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Lock, A. (Ed.). (1978). Action, gesture, and symbol: The emergence of language. New York: Academic.Google Scholar
MacWhinney, B., & Bates, E. (Eds.). (1989). Crosslinguistic studies of sentence processing. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
McNeill, D. (1970). The acquisition of language. New York: Holt.Google Scholar
Moore, T. E. (Ed.). (1973). Cognitive development and the acquisition of language. New York: Academic.Google Scholar
Piaget, J. (1950). The psychology of intelligence. New York: Harcourt, Brace, & Jovanovich.Google Scholar
Piatelli-Palmarini, J. (Ed.). (1979). Théories du language, théories de 1'apprentissage. Paris: Seuil.Google Scholar
Slobin, D. (Ed.). (1967). A field manual for cross-ultural study of the acquisition of communicative competence. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Slobin, D. (Ed.). (1971). The ontogenesis of grammar. New York: Academic.Google Scholar
Slobin, D. (1973). Cognitive prerequisites for the development of grammar. In Ferguson, C. A. & Slobin, D. (Eds.), Studies of child language development (pp. 175–205). New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.Google Scholar
Slobin, D. (1981). The origins of grammatical encodings of events. In Deutsch, W. (Ed.), The child's construction of language (pp. 124–143). London: Academic.Google Scholar
Slobin, D., & Bever, T. (1982). Children use canonical sentence schemas: A cross-linguistic study of word order and inflections. Cognition, 12, 229–265.Google Scholar
Tavakolian, S. L. (Ed.). (1981). Language acquisition and linguistic theory. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar