Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-04T09:12:58.673Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

PERCEIVING VOWELS IN A SECOND LANGUAGE

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 February 2004

James Emil Flege  and
Ian R. A. MacKay
James Emil Flege
Affiliation:
University of Alabama
Ian R. A. MacKay
Affiliation:
University of Ottawa
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This study examines the perception of English vowels by native speakers of Italian. In two preliminary experiments, Italian university students who had lived in Canada for 3 months were found to have difficulty discriminating because they often identified both members of each contrast as instances of a single Italian vowel. The participants in two other experiments, long-time residents of Canada, were assigned to groups based on their age of arrival in Canada from Italy (early vs. late) and percentage of first language (L1) use (high L1 use vs. low L1 use). Experiment 3 focused on the discrimination of , and experiment 4 examined the discrimination of correct from incorrect realizations of . In both experiments, the early learners obtained higher discrimination scores than the late learners, and low-L1-use participants obtained higher scores than high-L1-use participants. Most important, the early learners who used Italian often (early high), but not the early learners who used Italian seldom (early low), were found to differ from native speakers of English in perceiving English vowels. These results suggest two important conclusions regarding second language (L2) perceptual learning: Learning an L2 in childhood does not guarantee a nativelike perception of L2 vowels, nor does the establishment of a sound system for the L1 preclude a functionally nativelike perception of L2 vowels. Another important finding is that, although the late learners generally perceived English vowels less accurately than the early learners, some perceived them accurately.This study was supported by grant DC00257 from the National Institute of Deafness and Other Communicative Disorders. The authors thank J. Prosperine and M. Pearse for help locating participants, Fr. M. Brodeur of St. Anthony's Church in Ottawa, Ontario, and all the participants. The authors are grateful to D. Meador and T. Piske for help preparing the stimuli used in experiment 4. Finally, thanks are extended to K. Aoyama, S. Imai, K. Tsukada, T. Piske, and three anonymous SSLA reviewers for comments on an earlier version of this article.

Type
Research Article
Information
Studies in Second Language Acquisition , Volume 26 , Issue 1 , March 2004 , pp. 1 - 34
Copyright
2004 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Agard, F., & DiPietro, R. (1964). The sounds of English and Italian. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Bahrick, H., Hall, L., Goggin, J., Bahrick, L., & Berger, S. (1994). Fifty years of language maintenance in bilingual Hispanic immigrants. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 123, 264–283.Google Scholar
Baker, W., Trofimovich, P., Mack, M., & Flege, J. (2002). The effect of perceived phonetic similarity on non-native sound learning by children and adults. In B. Skarabela, S. Fish, & A. Do (Eds.), Proceedings of the 26th annual Boston University Conference on Language Development (pp. 36–47). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.
Best, C. (1995). A direct realistic perspective on cross-language speech perception. In W. Strange (Ed.), Speech perception and linguistic experience: Issues in cross-language research (pp. 171–206). Timonium, MD: York Press.
Best, C., Faber, A., & Levitt, A. (1996). Perceptual assimilation of non-native vowel contrasts to the American English vowel system. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 99, 2602.Google Scholar
Best, C., McRoberts, G., & Goodell, E. (2001). Discrimination of non-native consonant contrasts varying in perceptual assimilation to the listener's native phonological system. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 109, 775–794.Google Scholar
Bohn, O.-S., & Flege, J. (1992). The production of new and similar vowels by adult German learners of English. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 14, 131–158.Google Scholar
Bosch, L., Costa, A., & Sebastián-Gallés, N. (2000). First and second language vowel perception in early bilinguals. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 12, 189–221.Google Scholar
Bradlow, A., & Pisoni, D. (1999). Recognition of spoken words by native and non-native listeners: Talker-, listener-, and item-related factors. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 106, 2074–2085.
Canepari, L. (1986). Italiano standard e pronunce regionali [Standard Italian and regional pronunciations] (3rd ed.). Padua, Italy: Cooperativa Libraria Editrice Università di Padova.
Cole, R. (1981). Perception of fluent speech by children and adults. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 379, 92–109.Google Scholar
Crowther, C., & Mann, V. (1994). Use of vocalic cues to consonant voicing and native language background: The influence of experimental design. Perception & Psychophysics, 55, 513–525.Google Scholar
Eisenberg, L, Shannon, R., Martinez, A., Wygonski, J., & Boothroyd, A. (2000). Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 107, 2704–2710.
Flege, J. (1984). The detection of French accent by American listeners. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 76, 692–707.Google Scholar
Flege, J. (1987). The production of “new” and “similar” phones in a foreign language: Evidence for the effect of equivalence classification. Journal of Phonetics, 15, 47–65.Google Scholar
Flege, J. (1988). The production and perception of speech sounds in a foreign languages. In H. Winitz (Ed.), Human communication and its disorders: A review (pp. 224–401). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
Flege, J. (1991). Orthographic evidence for the perceptual identification of vowels in Spanish and English. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 43, 701–731.Google Scholar
Flege, J. (1992a). Speech learning in a second language. In C. Ferguson, L. Menn, & C. Stoel-Gammon (Eds.), Phonological development: Models, research, and application (pp. 565–604). Timonium, MD: York Press.
Flege, J. (1992b). The Intelligibility of English vowels spoken by British and Dutch talkers. In R. Kent (Ed.), Intelligibility in speech disorders: Theory, measurement, and management (pp. 157–232). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Flege, J. (1995). Second-language speech learning: Theory, findings, and problems. In W. Strange (Ed.), Speech perception and linguistic experience: Issues in cross-language research (pp. 229–273). Timonium, MD: York Press.
Flege, J. (1998). The role of subject and phonetic variables in L2 speech acquisition. In M. Gruber, D. Higgins, K. Olsen, & T. Wysocki (Eds.), Papers from the 34th annual meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society: Vol. 2. The panels (pp. 213–232). Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.
Flege, J. (1999). Age of learning and second-language speech. In D. Birdsong (Ed.), New perspectives on the critical period hypothesis for second language acquisition (pp. 101–132). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Flege, J. (2002). Interactions between the native and second-language phonetic systems. In P. Burmeister, T. Piske, & A. Rohde (Eds.), An integrated view of language development: Papers in honor of Henning Wode (pp. 217–244). Trier, Germany: Wissenschaftlicher Verlag Trier.
Flege, J. (2003a). Assessing constraints on second-language segmental production and perception. In A. Meyer & N. Schiller (Eds.), Phonetics and phonology in language comprehension and production: Differences and similarities (pp. 319–355). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Flege, J. (2003b). Methods for assessing the perception of vowels in a second language. In E. Fava & A. Mioni (Eds.), Issues in clinical linguistics (pp. 19–44). Padua, Italy: UniPress.
Flege, J., Bohn, O.-S., & Jang, S. (1997). The effect of experience on non-native subjects' production and perception of English vowels. Journal of Phonetics, 25, 437–470.Google Scholar
Flege, J., Frieda, A., & Nozawa, T. (1997). Amount of native-language (L1) use affects the pronunciation of an L2. Journal of Phonetics, 25, 169–186.Google Scholar
Flege, J., Guion, S., Akahane-Yamada, R., & Downs-Pruitt, J. (1998). Categorial discrimination of English and Japanese vowels and consonants by native Japanese and English subjects. In P. Kuhl & L. Crum (Eds.), Proceedings of the 16th International Congress on Acoustics and the 135th meeting of the Acoustical Society of America: Vol. 4. (pp. 2973–2974). Woodbury, NY: Acoustical Society of America.
Flege, J., & Hammond, R. (1982). Mimicry of non-distinctive phonetic differences between language varieties. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 5, 1–18.Google Scholar
Flege, J., & Hillenbrand, J. (1984). Limits on phonetic accuracy in foreign language speech production. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 76, 708–721.Google Scholar
Flege, J., & Liu, S. (2001). The effect of experience on adults' acquisition of a second language. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 23, 527–552.Google Scholar
Flege, J., MacKay, I., & Meador, D. (1999). Native Italian speakers' production and perception of English vowels. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 106, 2973–2987.Google Scholar
Flege, J., MacKay, I., & Piske, T. (2002). Assessing bilingual dominance. Journal of Applied Psycholinguistic Research, 23, 567–598.Google Scholar
Flege, J., Munro, M., & Fox, R. (1994). Auditory and categorical effects on cross-language vowel perception. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 95, 3623–3641.Google Scholar
Flege, J., Schirru, C., & MacKay, I. (2003). Interaction between the native and second language phonetic subsystems. Speech Communication, 40, 467–491.Google Scholar
Flege, J., Yeni-Komshian, G., & Liu, S. (1999). Age constraints on second language learning. Journal of Memory and Language, 41, 78–104.Google Scholar
Francis, A., & Nusbaum, H. (2002). Selective attention and the acquisition of new phonetic categories. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 28, 349–366.Google Scholar
Gottfried, T. (1984). Effects of consonant context on the perception of French vowels. Journal of Phonetics, 12, 91–114.Google Scholar
Grenier, G. (1984). Shifts to English as usual language by Americans of Spanish mother tongue. Social Science Quarterly, 65, 537–550.Google Scholar
Guenther, F., Husain, F., Cohen, M., & Shinn-Cunningham, B. (1999). Effects of categorization and discrimination training on auditory perceptual space. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 106, 2900–2912.Google Scholar
Guion, S., Flege, J., Akahane-Yamada, R., & Pruitt, J. (2000). An investigation of current models of second language speech perception: The case of Japanese adults' perception of English consonants. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 107, 2711–2725.Google Scholar
Hillenbrand, J., Clark, M., & Nearey, T. (2001). Effects of consonant environment on vowel formant patterns. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 109, 748–763.Google Scholar
Ingram, J., & Park, S.-G. (1997). Cross-language vowel perception and production by Japanese and Korean learners of English. Journal of Phonetics, 25, 343–370.Google Scholar
Iverson, P., Kuhl, P., Yamada, R., Diesch, E., Tohkura, Y., Ketterman, A., & Siebert, C. (2003). A perceptual interference account of acquisition difficulties for non- native phonemes. Cognition, 87, B47–B57.Google Scholar
Johnson, C. (2000). Children's phoneme identification in reverberation and noise. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 43, 129–143.Google Scholar
Jun, S.-A., & Cowie, I. (1994) Interference for “new” and “similar” vowels in Korean speakers of English, Ohio State University Working Papers, 43, 117–130.Google Scholar
Kuhl, P. (1980). Perceptual constancy for speech sound categories in early infancy. In G. Yeni-Komshian, J. Kavanagh, & C. Ferguson (Eds.), Child phonology: Vol. 2. Perception (pp. 41–66). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Kuhl, P. (2000). A new view of language acquisition. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, 97, 11850–11857.Google Scholar
Kuhl, P., Williams, K., Lacerda, F., Stevens, K., & Lindblom, B. (1992). Linguistic experience alters phonetic perception in infants six months of age. Science, 255, 606–608.Google Scholar
Mack, M. (1989). Consonant and vowel perception and production: Early English-French and French-English bilinguals. Perception & Psychophysics, 46, 187–200.Google Scholar
MacKay, I., Meador, D., & Flege, J. (2001). The identification of English consonants by native speakers of Italian. Phonetica, 58, 103–125.Google Scholar
Major, R. (1987). Phonological similarity, markedness, and rate of L2 acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 9, 63–82.Google Scholar
Mayo, L., Florentine, M., & Buus, S. (1997). Age of second-language acquisition and perception of speech in noise. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 40, 686–693.Google Scholar
McAllister, R., Flege, J., & Piske, T. (2002). The influence of the L1 on the acquisition of Swedish vowel quantity by native speakers of Spanish, English, and Estonian. Journal of Phonetics, 30, 229–258.Google Scholar
McCandliss, B., Fiez, J., Protopapas, A., Conway, M., & McClelland, J. (2002). Success and failure in teaching the [r]-[l] contrast to Japanese adults: Predictions of a Hebbian model of plasticity and stabilization in spoken language perception. Cognitive, Affective, and Behavioral Neuroscience, 2, 89–108.Google Scholar
McClelland, J., Thomas, A., McCandliss, B., & Fiez, J. (1999). Understanding failures of learning: Hebbian learning, competition for representational space, and some preliminary experimental data. In J. Reggia, E. Ruppin, & D. Glanzman (Eds.), Progress in brain research: Vol. 121. Disorders of brain, behavior, and cognition—the neurocomputational perspective (pp. 75–80). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Meador, D., Flege, J., & MacKay, I. (2000). Factors affecting the recognition of words in a second language. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 3, 55–67.Google Scholar
Morrison, G. (2002). Effects of L1 duration experience on Japanese and Spanish listeners' perception of English high front vowels. Unpublished Master's thesis, Simon Fraser University, Vancouver, Canada.
Munro, M. (1993). Productions of English vowels by native speakers of Arabic: Acoustic measurements and accentedness ratings. Language and Speech, 36, 39–66.Google Scholar
Munro, M., & Derwing, T. (1995). Processing time, accent, and comprehensibility in the perception of native and foreign-accented speech. Language and Speech, 38, 289–306.Google Scholar
Munro, M., Flege, J., & MacKay, I. (1996). The effect of age of second-language learning on the production of English vowels. Applied Psycholinguistics, 17, 313–334.Google Scholar
Pallier, C., Bosch, L., & Sebastián-Gallés, N. (1997). A limit on behavioral plasticity in speech perception. Cognition, 64, B9–B17.Google Scholar
Pallier, C., Colomé, A., & Sebastián-Gallés, N. (2001). The influence of native-language phonology on lexical access: Exemplar-based versus abstract lexical entries. Psychological Science, 12, 445–449.Google Scholar
Patkowski, M. (1989). Age and accent in a second language: A reply to James Emil Flege. Applied Linguistics, 11, 73–89.Google Scholar
Piske, T., Flege, J., MacKay, I., & Meador, D. (2002). The production of English vowels by fluent early and late bilinguals. Phonetica, 59, 49–71.Google Scholar
Piske, T., MacKay, I., & Flege, J. (2001). Factors affecting degree of foreign accent in an L2: A review. Journal of Phonetics, 29, 191–215.Google Scholar
Polka, L. (1995). Linguistic influences in adult perception of non-native vowel contrasts. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 97, 1286–1296.Google Scholar
Rochet, B. (1995). Perception and production of second-language speech sounds by adults. In W. Strange (Ed.), Speech perception and linguistic experience: Issues in cross-language speech research (pp. 379–410). Timonium, MD: York Press.
Schmid, P., & Yeni-Komshian, G. (1999). The effects of speaker accent and target predictability on perception of mispronunciation. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 42, 56–64.Google Scholar
Scovel, T. (1988). A time to speak: A psycholinguistic inquiry into the critical period for human speech. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
Scovel, T. (2000). A critical review of critical period research. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 20, 213–223.Google Scholar
Sebastián-Gallés, N., & Soto-Faraco, S. (1999). On-line processing of native and non-native phonemic contrasts in early bilinguals. Cognition, 72, 111–123.Google Scholar
Snodgrass, J., Levy-Berger, G., & Haydon, M. (1985). Human experimental psychology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Snow, C. (1987). Relevance of the notion of a critical period to language acquisition. In M. Bornstein (Ed.), Sensitive periods in development: Interdisciplinary perspectives (pp. 183–209). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Stevens, G. (1999). Age at immigration and second language proficiency among foreign-born adults. Language in Society, 28, 555–578.Google Scholar
Walley, A., & Flege, J. (2000). Effects of lexical status on children's and adults' perception of native and non-native vowels. Journal of Phonetics, 27, 307–332.Google Scholar
Yamada, R. (1995). Age and acquisition of second language speech sounds: Perception of American English /[inverted r]/ and /l/ by native speakers of Japanese. In W. Strange (Ed.), Speech perception and linguistic experience: Issues in cross-language research (pp. 305–320). Timonium, MD: York Press.
Yeni-Komshian, G. H., Flege, J., & Liu, S. (2000). Pronunciation proficiency in the first and second languages of Korean-English bilinguals. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 3, 131–150.Google Scholar