Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-14T05:20:09.322Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

ORAL LANGUAGE PROFILES OF ENGLISH SECOND LANGUAGE LEARNERS IN ADOLESCENCE

COGNITIVE AND INPUT FACTORS INFLUENCE HOW THEY COMPARE TO THEIR MONOLINGUAL PEERS

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 March 2020

Adriana Soto-Corominas*
Affiliation:
University of Alberta
Johanne Paradis
Affiliation:
University of Alberta
Brian V. Rusk
Affiliation:
University of Alberta
Stefka Marinova-Todd
Affiliation:
University of British Columbia
Xuan Zhang
Affiliation:
University of British Columbia
*
*Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Adriana Soto-Corominas, Department of Linguistics, University of Alberta Edmonton, Canada AB T6G 2E7. E-mail: [email protected].

Abstract

It is often claimed that child English L2 learners take up to seven years to attain English skills commensurate with those of monolingual peers; however, existing research is insufficient to know if this claim is valid for oral language abilities in particular. This study examined the lexical and morphological abilities of English L2 learners and their monolingual peers (ages 12–15; N = 227) in Canadian middle schools to determine the timeline for convergence with monolinguals, and what factors predict individual differences among L2 learners. Having seven or more years of schooling was insufficient for all L2 learners to converge with monolinguals on all measures; moreover, growth in English abilities slowed after seven years. Regression analyses revealed that use of English with friends, parental education, and cognitive skills predicted individual variation in the L2 learners’ English abilities and, thus, contributed to their potential for convergence with monolinguals.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

We thank all the students and their parents for participating in this research. We would like to acknowledge the cooperation of Edmonton Public Schools, the Vancouver School Board, and Aurora Charter School in this research, as well as the support from the teachers and principals at the participating schools. We also thank the student research assistants who collected the data: Keren Hernandez, Anisha Monga, Kristyna Becker, Brian Park, Caitria Chan, Eun Kim, Megan Choh, Ruka Miller, and Ziyu Yang. Finally, we are grateful for the funding from the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada (Insight Grant 435-2015-0034 awarded to Paradis) that supported this research.

References

REFERENCES

Baayen, R. H., & Milin, P. (2010). Analyzing reaction times. International Journal of Psychological Research, 3,1228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bates, D., Maechler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S. (2015). lme4: Linear mixed-effects models using Eigen and S4. R package version 1. pp. 17.Google Scholar
Bialystok, E., Luk, G., Peets, K. F., & Yang, S. (2010). Receptive vocabulary differences in monolingual and bilingual children. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 13, 525531.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bohman, T. M., Bedore, L. M., Peña, E. D., Mendez-Perez, A., & Gillam, R. B. (2010). What you hear and what you say: Language performance in Spanish–English bilinguals. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 13, 325344.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Borgna, C., & Contini, D. (2014). Migrant achievement penalties in Western Europe: Do educational systems matter? European Sociological Review, 30, 670683.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cameron, L. (2002). Measuring vocabulary size in English as an additional language. Language Teaching Research, 6, 145173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carhill, A., Suárez-Orozco, C., & Páez, M. (2008). Explaining English language proficiency among adolescent immigrant students. American Educational Research Journal, 45, 11551179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, X., Ramirez, G., Luo, Y. C., Geva, E., & Ku, Y. M. (2012). Comparing vocabulary development in Spanish-and Chinese-speaking DLLs: The effects of metalinguistic and sociocultural factors. Reading and Writing, 25, 19912020.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chondrogianni, V. (2018). Child L2 acquisition. In Miller, D.Bayram, F.Rothman, J., & Serratrice, L. (Eds.), Bilingual cognition and language: The state of the science across its subfields (pp. 315323). John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Chondrogianni, V., & Marinis, T. (2011). Differential effects of internal and external factors on the development of vocabulary, tense morphology and morphosyntax in successive bilingual children. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism,1, 318345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cobo-Lewis, A., Pearson, B., Eilers, R., & Umbel, V. (2002). Effects of bilingualism and bilingual education on oral and written English skills: A multifactor study of standardized test outcomes. In Oller, D. K. & Eilers, R. (Eds.), Language and literacy in bilingual children (pp. 6497). Multilingual Matters.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collier, V. (1987). Age and rate of acquisition of second language for academic purposes. TESOL Quarterly, 21, 617641.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collier, V. P., & Thomas, W. P. (1989). How quickly can immigrants become proficient in school English. Journal of Educational Issues of Language Minority Students, 5, 2638.Google Scholar
Cummins, J. (1981). Age on arrival and immigrant second language learning in Canada: A Reassessment. Applied Linguistics, 2, 132149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cummins, J. (2000). Language, power and pedagogy: Bilingual children in the crossfire. Multilingual Matters.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cummins, J. (2008). BICS and CALP: Empirical and theoretical status of the distinction. In B. V. Street & N. H. Hornberger (Eds.), Encyclopedia of language and education, 2nd Edition (Vol. 2: Literacy, pp. 7183). New York: Springer Science.Google Scholar
Demie, F., & Strand, S. (2006). English language acquisition and educational attainment at the end of secondary school. Educational Studies, 32, 215231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunn, L. M., & Dunn, D. M. (2007). PPVT-4: Peabody picture vocabulary test. Pearson Assessments.Google Scholar
Dulay, H., & Burt, M. (1973). Should we teach children syntax? Language Learning, 23, 245258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dulay, H., & Burt, M. (1974). Natural sequences in child second language acquisition. Language Learning, 24, 3753.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farnia, F., & Geva, E. (2011). Cognitive correlates of vocabulary growth in English language learners. Applied Psycholinguistics, 32, 711738.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Golberg, H., Paradis, J., & Crago, M. (2008). Lexical acquisition over time in minority first language children learning English as a second language. Applied Psycholinguistics, 29, 4165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hakuta, K., Butler, Y. G., & Witt, D. (2000). How long does it take English learners to attain proficiency? https://eric.ed.gov/?ID=ED443275Google Scholar
Hosmer, D. W., Lemeshow, S., & Sturdivant, R. X. (2013). Applied logistic regression (Vol. 398). John Wiley &Sons.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hothorn, T., Hornik, K., Van De Wiel, M. A., & Zeileis, A. (2008). Implementing a class of permutation tests: The coin package. Journal of Statistical Software, 28, 123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jia, G. (2003). The acquisition of the English plural morpheme by native Mandarin Chinese-speaking children. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 46, 12971311.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jia, G., & Fuse, A. (2007). Acquisition of English grammatical morphology by native Mandarin-speaking children and adolescents: Age-related differences. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 50, 12801299.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kaufman, A. S., & Kaufman, N. L. (2004). Kaufman Brief Intelligence Test, Second Edition. Pearson Inc.Google Scholar
Klesmer, H. (1993). Development of ESL achievement criteria as a function of age and length of residence in Canada. ESL Achievement Project. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED408862Google Scholar
Kohler, A. D., & Lazarín, M. (2007). Hispanic education in the United States. https://vtechworks.lib.vt.edu/handle/10919/83669Google Scholar
Lenth, R. (2019). emmeans: Estimated marginal means. R package version 1.3.2. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=emmeansGoogle Scholar
Lightbown, P. & Spada, N. (2006). How languages are learned. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mahon, M., & Crutchley, A. (2006). Performance of typically-developing school-age children with English as an additional language on the British picture vocabulary scales II. Child Language Teaching and Therapy, 22, 333351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marinis, T., & Chondrogianni, V. (2010). Production of tense marking in successive bilingual children: When do they converge with their monolingual peers? International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 12, 1928.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Montrul, S. (2016). The acquisition of heritage languages. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murphy, V. A. (2014). Second language learning in the early school years: Trends and contexts. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Murphy, V. A. (2018). Literacy development in linguistically diverse pupils. In Miller, D., Bayram, F., Rothman, J., & Serratrice, L. (Eds.), Bilingual cognition and language: The state of the science across its subfields (pp. 315323). John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Nation, I. S. (2001). Learning vocabulary in another language. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. (2017). Promoting the educational success of children and youth learning English: Promising futures. The National Academies Press.Google Scholar
OECD. (2010). PISA 2009 results: Learning trends: Changes in student performance since 2000 (Volume V). OECD Publishing. doi:10.1787/9789264091580-enCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paradis, J. (2011). Individual differences in child English second language acquisition: Comparing child-internal and child-external factors. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 1, 213–P237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paradis, J. (2016). The development of English as a second language with and without specific language impairment: Clinical implications. Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research, 58, 171182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paradis, J. (2017). Parent report data on input and experience reliably predict bilingual development and this is not trivial. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 20, 2728.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paradis, J. (2019). English second language acquisition from early childhood to adulthood: The role of age, first language, cognitive and input factors. Proceedings of the 43rd Boston University Conference on Language Development.Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Paradis, J., & Jia, R. (2017). Bilingual children’s long‐term outcomes in English as a second language: Language environment factors shape individual differences in catching up with monolinguals. Developmental Science, 20, e12433.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Paradis, J., Rice, M., Crago, M., & Marquis, J. (2008). The acquisition of tense in English: Distinguishing child L2 from L1 and SLI. Applied Psycholinguistics, 29, 134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paradis, J., Tulpar, Y., & Arppe, A. (2016). Chinese L1 children’s English L2 verb morphology over time: Individual variation in long-term outcomes. Journal of Child Language, 43, 553580.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Picot, G., & Sweetman, A. (2012). Making it in Canada: Immigration outcomes and policies. IRPP Study, 29, 148.Google Scholar
Psychology Software Tools, Inc. (2012). E-Prime 2.0. http://www.pstnet.comGoogle Scholar
Qian, D. D. (1999). Assessing the roles of depth and breadth of vocabulary knowledge in reading comprehension. Canadian Modern Language Review, 56, 282308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramsey, C. A., & Wright, E. N. (1974). Age and second language learning. The Journal of Social Psychology, 94, 115121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
R Core Team. (2018). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.r-project.org/Google Scholar
Read, J. (2004). Plumbing the depths: How should the construct of vocabulary knowledge be defined? In Bogaards, P. & Laufer, B. (Eds.), Vocabulary in a second language: Selection, acquisition, and testing (pp. 209227). John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rusk, B., Paradis, J. & Järvikivi, J. (In preparation). Child L2 learners’ grammaticality judgments: Comparing community and classroom immersion learners.Google Scholar
Sassenhagen, J., & Alday, P. M. (2016). A common misapplication of statistical inference: Nuisance control with null-hypothesis significance tests. Brain and Language, 162, 4245.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Saunders, W. & O’Brien, G. (2006). Oral language. In Genesee, F.et al. (Eds.), Educating English language learners: A synthesis of research evidence. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Schnepf, S. V. (2007). Immigrants’ educational disadvantage: An examination across ten countries and three surveys. Journal of Population Economics, 20, 527545.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Semel, E., Wiig, E. H., & Secord, W. A. (2003). Clinical Evaluation of Language Fundamentals (CELF-4). PsychCorp.Google Scholar
Spinner, P., & Gass, S. M. (2019). Using judgments in second language acquisition research. Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Statistics Canada. (2017). Education in Canada: Key results from the 2016 Census. https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/n1/daily-quotidien/171129/dq171129a-eng.htm?lnk=dai-quo&indid=14431-2&indgeo=0Google Scholar
Strand, S., & Demie, F. (2005). English language acquisition and educational attainment at the end of primary school. Educational Studies, 31, 275291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, W. P., & Collier, V. (1997). School effectiveness for language minority students. NCBE Resource Collection Series, No. 9.Google Scholar
Wagner, R. K., Torgesen, J. K., & Rashotte, C. A. (1999). Comprehensive test of phonological processing: CTOPP. Pro-ed.Google Scholar
Zdorenko, T., & Paradis, J. (2008). The acquisition of articles in child L2 English: Fluctuation, transfer or both? Second Language Research, 24, 227250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: PDF

Soto-Corominas et al. supplementary material

Soto-Corominas et al. supplementary material 1

Download Soto-Corominas et al. supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 169.9 KB
Supplementary material: PDF

Soto-Corominas et al. supplementary material

Soto-Corominas et al. supplementary material 2

Download Soto-Corominas et al. supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 86 KB