Crossref Citations
This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by
Crossref.
Wong, Wynne
and
Simard, Daphnée
2001.
La saisie, cette grande oubliée !.
Acquisition et interaction en langue étrangère,
p.
59.
Gass, Susan
Svetics, Ildikó
and
Lemelin, Sarah
2003.
Differential Effects of Attention.
Language Learning,
Vol. 53,
Issue. 3,
p.
497.
Leeser, Michael J.
2004.
THE EFFECTS OF TOPIC FAMILIARITY, MODE, AND PAUSING ON SECOND LANGUAGE LEARNERS' COMPREHENSION AND FOCUS ON FORM.
Studies in Second Language Acquisition,
Vol. 26,
Issue. 04,
DeKeyser, Robert M.
2005.
What Makes Learning Second‐Language Grammar Difficult? A Review of Issues.
Language Learning,
Vol. 55,
Issue. S1,
p.
1.
Pica, Teresa
Kang, Hyun-Sook
and
Sauro, Shannon
2006.
INFORMATION GAP TASKS: Their Multiple Roles and Contributions to Interaction Research Methodology.
Studies in Second Language Acquisition,
Vol. 28,
Issue. 02,
Marsden, Emma
2006.
Exploring Input Processing in the Classroom: An Experimental Comparison of Processing Instruction and Enriched Input.
Language Learning,
Vol. 56,
Issue. 3,
p.
507.
Moyer, Alene
2006.
Language Contact and Confidence in Second Language Listening Comprehension: A Pilot Study of Advanced' Learners of German.
Foreign Language Annals,
Vol. 39,
Issue. 2,
p.
255.
Diao, Yali
and
Sweller, John
2007.
Redundancy in foreign language reading comprehension instruction: Concurrent written and spoken presentations.
Learning and Instruction,
Vol. 17,
Issue. 1,
p.
78.
Lee, Sang‐Ki
2007.
Effects of Textual Enhancement and Topic Familiarity on Korean EFL Students' Reading Comprehension and Learning of Passive Form.
Language Learning,
Vol. 57,
Issue. 1,
p.
87.
CHAVEZ, MONIKA
2007.
Students' and Teachers' Assessments of the Need for Accuracy in the Oral Production of German as a Foreign Language.
The Modern Language Journal,
Vol. 91,
Issue. 4,
p.
537.
Gilbertson, Donna
Maxfield, Janie
and
Hughes, John
2007.
Evaluating Responsiveness to Intervention for English-Language Learners: A Comparison of Response Modes on Letter Naming Rates.
Journal of Behavioral Education,
Vol. 16,
Issue. 3,
p.
259.
Leow, Ronald P.
Hsieh, Hui‐Chen
and
Moreno, Nina
2008.
Attention to Form and Meaning Revisited.
Language Learning,
Vol. 58,
Issue. 3,
p.
665.
Han, Z.
Park, E. S.
and
Combs, C.
2008.
Textual Enhancement of Input: Issues and Possibilities.
Applied Linguistics,
Vol. 29,
Issue. 4,
p.
597.
Lee, Sang-Ki
and
Huang, Hung-Tzu
2008.
VISUAL INPUT ENHANCEMENT AND GRAMMAR LEARNING: A Meta-Analytic Review.
Studies in Second Language Acquisition,
Vol. 30,
Issue. 3,
p.
307.
Lee, Eun-Ju
2008.
Gender Stereotyping of Computers: Resource Depletion or Reduced Attention?.
Journal of Communication,
Vol. 58,
Issue. 2,
p.
301.
Hu, Chieh-Fang
2008.
Use orthography in L2 auditory word learning: Who benefits?.
Reading and Writing,
Vol. 21,
Issue. 8,
p.
823.
Lee, Eun-Ju
2008.
Flattery may get computers somewhere, sometimes: The moderating role of output modality, computer gender, and user gender.
International Journal of Human-Computer Studies,
Vol. 66,
Issue. 11,
p.
789.
하종범
2008.
The Effect of Textual Enhancement on the Performance during Online Chat.
The Jungang Journal of English Language and Literature,
Vol. 50,
Issue. 1,
p.
355.
2008.
Replication studies in language learning and teaching: Questions and answers.
Language Teaching,
Vol. 41,
Issue. 1,
p.
1.
박은성
2009.
Learners' Perception of Indirect Written Feedback and Its Impact on Their Classroom Performance.
Bilingual Research,
Vol. null,
Issue. 41,
p.
179.