We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)
References
REFERENCES
Bailey, C.-J. (1973). Variation and linguistic theory. Arlington, VA: Center for Applied Linguistics.Google Scholar
Bickerton, D. (1971). Inherent variability and variable rules. Foundations of Language, 7, 457–492.Google Scholar
Cazden, C., Cancino, H., Rosansky, E., & Schumann, J. (1975). Second language acquisition sequences in children, adolescents and adults (Research Report). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Graduate School of Education.Google Scholar
Clahsen, H., Meisel, J., & Pienemann, M. (1983). Deutsch als Zweitsprache. Tübingen: Gunter Narr.Google Scholar
Corder, S. P. (1967). The significance of learner's errors. IRAL, 5, 161–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeCamp, D. (1973). Implicational scales and sociolinguistic linearity. Linguistics, 73, 30–43.Google Scholar
Felix, S. W. (Ed.). (1980). Second language development: Trends and issues. Tübingen: Gunter Narr.Google Scholar
Huebner, T. (1979). Order-of-acquisition versus dynamic paradigm: A comparison of method in interlanguage research. TESOL Quarterly, 13, 21–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hyltenstam, K. (1977). Implication patterns in interlanguage syntax variation. Language Learning, 27, 383–411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klein, W., & Dittmar, H. (1979). Developing grammars: The acquisition of German syntax by foreign workers. Berlin: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Labov, W. (1969). Contraction, deletion and inherent variability of the English copula. Language, 45, 715–762.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levelt, W., Mills, A., & Karmiloff-Smith, A. (1981). Child language research in ESF countries: An inventory. Strasbourg: European Science Foundation.Google Scholar
Li, C., & Thompson, S. (1976). Subject and topic: A new typology of language. In Li, C. (Ed.), Subject and topic, (pp. 457–490). New York: Academic.Google Scholar
Meisel, J., Clahsen, H., & Pienemann, M. (1981). On determining developmental stages in second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 3, 109–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nicholas, H., & Meisel, J. (1983). Second language acquisition: The state of the art. In Felix, S. & Wode, H. (Eds.), Language development at the crossroads (pp. 63–90). Tübingen: Gunter Narr.Google Scholar
Pienemann, M. (1981). Der Zweitspracherwerb ausländischer Arbeiterkinder. Bonn: Bouvier.Google Scholar
Wode, H. (1981). Learning a second language: Vol. 1. An integrated view of language acquisition. Tübingen: Gunter Narr.Google Scholar