Hostname: page-component-6bf8c574d5-rwnhh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-18T21:56:54.960Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

THE (IN)STABILITY OF GRAMMARS

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 July 2019

Michael T. Putnam Open the ORCID record for Michael T. Putnam [Opens in a new window]
Michael T. Putnam*
Affiliation:
Penn State University
*
*Correspondence concerning this article should be sent to Michael T. Putnam, 239 Burrowes, Penn State University, University Park, PA 16802. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Critical Commentary
Information
Studies in Second Language Acquisition , Volume 41 , Issue 2 , May 2019 , pp. 275 - 278
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

A special thanks to Matt Carlson, Terje Lohndal, and Liliana Sánchez for helpful comments and riveting discussions.

References

REFERENCES

Bousquette, J., & Putnam, M. (2019). Redefining language death: Evidence from moribund grammars. Language Learning. Advance online publication. doi: 10.1111/lang.12362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clahsen, H., & Felser, C. (2006). Grammatical processing in language learnings. Applied Psycholinguistics, 27, 3–42. doi: 10.1017/s0142716406060024.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cook, V. (2016). Premises of multi-competence. In Cook, V. & Wei, L. (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of linguistic multicompetence (pp. 1–25). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9781107425965.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cunnings, I. (2017). Parsing and working memory in bilingual sentence processing. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 20, 659–678. doi: 10.1017/S1366728916000675.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Bot, K. (2016). Multi-competence and dynamic/complex systems. In Cook, V. & Wei, L. (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of linguistic multicompetence (pp. 125–141). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Domínguez, L., Hicks, G., & Slabakova, R. (2019). Terminology choice in generative acquisition research: The case of “incomplete acquisition” in heritage language grammars. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 41(2), 241–255. doi: 10.1017/S0272263119000160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferreira, F., & Patson, N. (2007). The “good enough” approach to language comprehension. Language and Linguistics Compass, 1, 71–83. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-818X.2007.00007.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldrick, M., Putnam, M., & Schwarz, L. (2016). Co-activation in bilingual grammars: A computational account of code mixing. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 19, 857–876. doi: 10.1017/S1366728915000802.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Montrul, S. (2016). The acquisition of heritage languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9781139030502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pliatsikas, C., & Marinis, T. (2013). Processing empty categories in a second language: When naturalistic exposure fills the (intermediate) gap. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 16, 167–182. doi: 10.1017/S136672891200017X.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Putnam, M., & Sánchez, L. (2013). What’s so incomplete about incomplete acquisition? A prolegomenon to modeling heritage language grammars. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 3, 478–508. doi: 10.1075/lab.3.4.04put.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Putnam, M., Carlson, M., & Reitter, D. (2018). Integrated, not isolated: Defining typological proximity in an integrated multilingual architecture. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 2212. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02212.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Scontras, G., Polinsky, M., & Fuchs, Z. (2018). In support of representational economy: Agreement in heritage Spanish. Glossa: A Journal of General Linguistics, 3, 1–29. doi: 10.5334/gjgl.164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smolensky, P., Goldrick, M., & Mathis, D. (2014). Optimization and quantization in gradient symbol systems: A framework for integrating the continuous and the discrete in cognition. Cognitive Science, 38, 1102–1138. doi: 10.1111/cogs.12047.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed