Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-04T18:12:41.911Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Grammaticalization Processes in the Area of Temporal and Modal Relations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 November 2008

Anna Giacalone Ramat
Anna Giacalone Ramat
Affiliation:
University of Pavia-Italy
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This study investigates some instances of linguistic development in the acquisition of a second language that might be subsumed under the issue of grammaticalization. First, the notion of grammaticalization is discussed with reference to the current linguistic debate and its applicability to the domain of language acquisition is evaluated. Then, some cases are examined drawing on data on the acquisition of Italian collected during several years at the University of Pavia. With respect to temporality and modality, learners are shown to move from lexical means or context-dependent strategies to a gradual acquisition of the morphological devices required by the target language. The results of the analyses are discussed in terms of their implications for both general linguistic theory and language acquisition research.

Type
Articles
Information
Studies in Second Language Acquisition , Volume 14 , Issue 3 , September 1992 , pp. 297 - 322
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Andersen, R. (1984). Second language: A cross-linguistic perspective. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Banfi, E. (1990). Infinito (ed altro) quale forma basica del verbo in micro-sistemi di apprendimento spontaneo di italiano-L2. In Bernini, G. & Giacalone Ramat, A. (Eds.), La temporalità nell'acquisizione di lingue seconde (pp. 39–50). Milan: F. Angeli.Google Scholar
Bates, E., & MacWhinney, B. (1982). Functionalist approaches to grammar. In Wanner, E. & Gleitman, R. L. (Eds.). Language acquisition: The state of the art (pp. 173–221). London: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Benveniste, E. (1968). Mutations of linguistic categories. In Lehmann, W. P. & Malkiel, Y. (Eds.), Directions for historical linguistics (pp. 85–94). Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Bernini, G. (1990a). L'acquisizione dell'imperfetto nell'italiano lingua seconda. In Banfi, E. & Cordin, P. (Eds.), Storia dell'italiano e forme dell'italianizzazione (pp. 157–179). Rome: Bulzoni.Google Scholar
Bernini, G. (1990b). Lo sviluppo di paradigmi verbali nelle varietà elementari di apprendimento dell'italiano lingua seconda. In Bernini, G. & Giacalone Ramat, A. (Eds.), La temporalità nell'acquisizione di lingue seconde (pp. 81–101). Milan: F. Angeli.Google Scholar
Berretta, M. (1990a). II futuro in italiano L2. Quaderni del Dipartimento di Linguistica e Letterature Comparate (Università di Bergamo), 6, 147–188.Google Scholar
Berretta, M. (1990b). II ruolo dell'infinito nel sistema verbale di apprendenti di italiano come L2. In Bernini, G. & Giacalone Ramat, A. (Eds.), La temporalità nell'acquisizione di lingue seconde (pp. 51–80). Milan: F. Angeli.Google Scholar
Berretta, M., & Crotta, G. (1991). Italiano L2 in un soggetto plurilingue (cantonese-maltese-inglese): Sviluppo della morfologia. Studi italiani di linguistica teorica ed applicata, 20, 285–331.Google Scholar
Bertinetto, P. M. (1990). Perifrasi verbali italiane: Criteri di identificazione e gerarchia di perifrasticita. In Bernini, G. & Giacalone Ramat, A. (Eds.), La temporalità nell'acquisizione di lingue seconde (pp. 331–350). Milan: F. Angeli.Google Scholar
Bhardwaj, M., Dietrich, R., & Noyau, C. (1988). Temporality. Strasbourg: European Science Foundation.Google Scholar
Blackshire-Belay, C. (1991). Language contact. Verb morphology in German of foreign workers. Tübingen: Gunter Narr.Google Scholar
Bybee, J. L., & Pagliuca, W. (1985). Cross-linguistic comparison and the development of grammatical meaning. In Fisiak, J. (Ed.). Historical semantics: Historical word-formation (pp. 59–83). The Hague: Mouton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caffi, C. (1990). Modulazione, mitigazione, litote. In Conte, M.-E., Ramat, P., & Giacalone Ramat, A. (Eds.), Dimensioni della linguistica (pp. 169–199). Milan: F. Angeli.Google Scholar
Cereia Fuso, P. (1988). L'acquisizione della temporalita in italiano da parte di tre parlanti anglofoni. Unpublished master's thesis, University of Pavia, Italy.Google Scholar
Chini, M. (1992). L'acquisizione del genere grammaticale in italiano L2. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Pavia, Italy.Google Scholar
Clahsen, H. (1991). German plurals in adult second language acquisition. ‘Theorie des Lexikons Nr.4’: Universal Grammar in Second Language Acquisition (pp. 48–66). Düsseldorf.Google Scholar
Colleoni, M. (1988). Dall'inglese all'italiano: Sviluppo del sistema verbale in italiano L2. Unpublished master's thesis, University of Bergamo, Italy.Google Scholar
Croft, W. (1990). Typology and universals. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dittmar, N. (1979). Fremdspracherwerb im sozialen Kontext: Das Erlernen von Modalverben- eine lexikalisch-semantische Analyse. In Klein, W. (Ed.), Sprache und Kontext, LiLi, 9, 84–103.Google Scholar
Dittmar, N. (1984). Semantic features of pidginized learner varieties. In Andersen, R. (Ed.), Second language. A crosslinguistic perspective (pp. 243–270). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Dittmar, N. (1989, 05). Emergent grammars I. The case of ‘proto-modality’ and the connective aber in the learner varieties of German by a Polish migrant. Paper presented at the Symposium on Modality in Language Acquisition, Berlin.Google Scholar
Dittmar, N., & Terborg, H. (1991). Modality and second language learning: A challenge for linguistic theory. In Huebner, T. & Ferguson, C. A. (Eds.), Crosscurrents in second language acquisition and linguistic theory (pp. 347–384). Amsterdam: Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dittmar, N., et al. (1988). Die Erlernung modaler Konzepte des Deutschen durch erwachsene polnische Migranten. Eine empirische Läangsschnittstudie. In Berliner Papiere zum Zweitspracherwerb (Vol. 1). Berlin: Fachbereich Germanistik der Freien Universitāt.Google Scholar
Dressler, W., Mayerthaler, W., Panagl, O., & Wurzel, W. (1987). Leitmotifs in natural morphology. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar
Dressler, W., & Merlini Barbaresi, L. (1990). Grammaticalizzazione morfopragmatica. In Berretta, M., Molinelli, P., & Valentini, A. (Eds.), Parallela 4. Morfologia/Morphologie (pp. 135–145). Tubingen: Narr.Google Scholar
Giacalone Ramat, A. (1990). Presentazione del Progretto di Pavia sull'acquisizione di lingue seconde. Lo sviluppo di strutture temporali. In Bernini, G. & Giacalone Ramat, A. (Eds.), La temporalità nell'acquisizio- ne di lingue seconde (pp. 13–38). Milan: F. Angeli.Google Scholar
Giacalone Ramat, A. (in press-a). Iconicity in grammaticalization processes. In Simone, R. (Ed.), Iconicity in language. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar
Giacalone Ramat, A. (in press-b). L'italiano parlato da stranieri immigrati. Prime generalizzazioni. In Doria, M., Fava, E., & Zudini, D. (Eds.), Festschrift for G. Francescato. Trieste: LINT.Google Scholar
Giacalone Ramat, A., & Banfi, E. (1990). The acquisition of temporality. A second language perspective. Folia Linguistica, 24, 405–428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Givòn, T. (1979). On understanding grammar. New York: Academic.Google Scholar
Givòn, T. (1985). Function, structure and language. In Slobin, D. (Ed.), The crosslinguistic study of language acquisition (pp. 1005–1027). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Goossens, L. (1982). On the development of the modals and of the epistemic function in Old English. In Ahlqvist, A. (Ed.), Papers from the 5th International Conference on Historical Linguistics (pp. 74–84). Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar
Haiman, J. (1980). The iconicity of grammar: Isomorphism and motivation. Language, 56, 515–540.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harris, M. (1988). Concessive clauses in English and Romance. In Haiman, J. & Thompson, S. (Eds.), Clause combining in grammar and discourse (pp. 71–99). Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar
Heine, B., Claudi, U., & Hūnnemeyer, F. (1991). Grammaticalization: A conceptual framework. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Heine, B., & Reh, M. (1984). Grammaticalization and reanalysis in African languages. Hamburg: Buske.Google Scholar
Holm, J. (1989). Pidgins and Creoles: Vol. I. Theory and structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hopper, P. J. (1987). Emergent grammar. Berkeley Linguistic Society, 13, 129–157.Google Scholar
Hopper, P. J., & Thompson, S. A. (1984). The discourse basis for lexical categories in universal grammar. Language, 60, 703–752.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huebner, T. (1983). A longitudinal analysis of the acquisition of English. Ann Arbor, MI: Karoma.Google Scholar
Hyams, N. (1986). Language acquisition and the theory of parameters. Dordrecht: Reidel.Google Scholar
Klein, W. (1986). Second language acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lehmann, C. (1982). Thoughts on grammaticalization. Arbeiten der Kōlner Universalien-Projekts, No. 48. Cologne: Cologne University.Google Scholar
Lehmann, C. (1985). Grammaticalization: Synchronic variation and linguistic change. Lingua e Stile, 20, 303–310.Google Scholar
Lehmann, C. (1988, 05). Grammaticalization in Modern German. Paper presented at the Symposium on Grammaticalization, University of Oregon, Eugene.Google Scholar
Lyons, J. (1977). Semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
MacWhinney, B., & Bates, E. (1989). The crosslinguistic study of sentence processing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Massariello Merzagora, G. (1990). Mezzi lessicali per l'espressione della temporalità in apprendenti sinofoni. In Bernini, G. & Giacalone Ramat, A. (Eds.), La temporalità nell' acquisizione di lingue seconde (pp. 103–116). Milan: F.Angeli.Google Scholar
Meillet, A. (1948). L'evolution des formes grammaticales. In Linguistique historique et linguistique gènèrale (pp. 130–148). Paris: Champion. (Original work published 1912.)Google Scholar
Michell, G. (1976). Indicating the truth of propositions: A pragmatic function of sentence adverbs. In Papers from the Twelfth Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society (pp. 495–505). Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.Google Scholar
Minonne, C. (1989). La modalità nell'italiano di apprendenti avanzati germanofoni. Unpublished master's thesis, University of Pavia, Italy.Google Scholar
Orletti, F. (1988). L'italiano dei filippini a Roma. In Giacalone Ramat, A. (Ed.), L'italiano tra le altre lingue: Strategie di acquisizione (pp. 143–159). Bologna: II Mulino.Google Scholar
Palmer, F. R. (1986). Mood and modality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Pecoraro, W., & Pisacane, C. (1984). L'avverbio. Bologna: Zanichelli.Google Scholar
Romaine, S. (1988). Pidgin and Creole languages. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Russier, C., Stoffel, H., & Vèronique, D. (1991). Modalisations en langue étrangère. Aix-en-Provence: Publications de l'Universite de Provence.Google Scholar
Sankoff, G., & Laberge, S. (1980). On the acquisition of native speakers by a language. In Sankoff, G. (Ed.). The social life of language (pp. 195–209). Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sato, C. J. (1990). The syntax of conversation in interlanguage development. Tūbingen: G. Narr.Google Scholar
Scalise, S. (1990). Morfologia e lessico. Bologna: II Mulino.Google Scholar
Schumacher, M., & Skiba, R. (1990). Prādikative und modale Ausdrucksmittel in den Lernervarietāten einer polnischen Migrantin. In Berliner Papiere zum Zweitspracherwerb (Vol. 5). Berlin: Freie Universit¨at Berlin.Google Scholar
Schumann, J. (1978). The pidginization process: A model for second language acquisition. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Schwarze, C. (1988). Grammatik der italienischen Sprache. Tūbingen: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Serianni, L. (1989). Grammatica italiana. Italiano comune e lingua letteraria. Torino: UTET.Google Scholar
Shepherd, S. (1982). From deontic to epistemic: An analysis of modals in the history of English, Creoles and language acquisition. In Ahlqvist, A. (Ed.). Papers from the 5th ICHL (pp. 316–323). Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar
Simone, R., & Amacker, R. (1977). Verbi ‘Modali’ in italiano. Per una teoria generale della modalità nelle lingue naturali. Italian Linguistics, 3, 7–99.Google Scholar
Slobin, D. I. (1985). The crosslinguistic study of language acquisition. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Spiti, G. M. (1986). Magari nell'italiano contemporaneo. In Lichem, K., Mara, E., & Knaller, S. (Eds.), Parallela 2. Aspetti della sintassi dell'italiano contemporaneo (pp. 301–308). Tūbingen: Narr.Google Scholar
Stephany, U. (1986). Modality. In Fletcher, P. & Garman, M. (Eds.), Language acquisition. Studies in first language development (pp. 375–400). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, J. R. (1989). Linguistic categorization: Prototypes in linguistic theory. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Traugott, E. (1982). From propositional to textual and expressive meanings: Some semantic-pragmatic aspects of grammaticalization. In Lehmann, W. P. & Malkiel, Y. (Eds.), Perspectives on historical linguistics (pp. 245–271). Amsterdam: Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Traugott, E. (1989). On the rise of epistemic meanings in English: An example of subjectification in semantic change. Language, 65, 31–55.Google Scholar
Valentini, A. (1992). Problemi di sintassi nell'italiano di sinofoni. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Pavia, Italy.Google Scholar
Venier, F. (1986). Gli awerbi modali. Lingua e Stile, 21, 459–483.Google Scholar
von Stutterheim, C. (1986). Temporalitāt in der Zweitsprache. Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Wode, H. (1990). Continuity in the development of language acquisitional abilities. In Burmeister, H. & Rounds, P. L. (Eds.), Variability in second language acquisition (Vol. 1, pp. 85–116). Proceedings of the 10th meeting of the Second Language Research Forum, Department of Linguistics and American English Institute, University of Oregon, Eugene.Google Scholar