Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T21:00:13.887Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Expression of Temporality in Basilang Speech

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 November 2008

John H. Schumann
John H. Schumann
Affiliation:
University of California, Los Angeles
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper examines the expression of temporality in the basilang speech (the earliest stage of second language development) of five subjects. Temporality is studied from three perspectives: morphology, semantics, and pragmatics. The first analysis determined the subjects' degree of target-like use of English morphology and demonstrated that these basilang speakers generally lack verb phrase morphology and do not have a tense system. The second analysis examined the subjects' utterances in terms of sentence-level semantics, classifying utterances according to (universal) categories such as completive versus non-completive action, habitual versus continuous action, and action versus states. The analysis showed that none of the subjects studied made tense or aspectual distinctions and that temporal marking was not accomplished by the form of the verb. The third analysis examined how temporal reference was made by the adverbials (now, tomorrow, always, prepositional phrases), serialization (the fixing of a temporal reference point and allowing the sequence of utterances to reflect the actual temporal order of reported events), calendric reference (dates, days of the week, months, and numbers), and implicit reference (temporal reference inferred from a particular context or situation). This taxonomy captured the expression of time at the basilang level of interlanguage development much better than the previous two analyses.

Type
Research Article
Information
Studies in Second Language Acquisition , Volume 9 , Issue 1 , February 1987 , pp. 21 - 41
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Aksu, A., Dittmar, N., Klein, W., & von Stutterheim, C. (1982). On the acquisition of temporality in German by adult migrant workers. (Paper presented at the Second European–North American Workshop on Cross-Linguistic Second Language Acquisition Research, Gohrde/Hamburg, West Germany).Google Scholar
Andersen, R. W. (in press). El desarollo de la morfologia verbal en el español como segundo idioma. In Meisel, J. M. (Ed.), Adquisicion del lenguaje—Aquisicao da linguagem. Frankfurt: Klaus-Dieler Vervuert Verlag.Google Scholar
Bailey, N., Madden, C., & Krashen, S. D. (1974). Is there a “natural sequence” in adult second language learning? Language Learning, 24, 235–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bickerton, D. (1975). Dynamics of a creole system. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bickerton, D. (1977). Pidginization and creolization: Language acquisition and language universals. In Valdman, A. (Ed.), Pidgin and creole linguistics (pp. 239–252). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Bickerton, D. (1981). Roots of language. Ann Arbor, MI: Karoma.Google Scholar
Bickerton, D. (1984). Evidence for a two-stage model of language from ontogeny and phylogeny. Paper presented at the Workshop on Ontogeny and Human Development, Tel-Aviv University, Israel.Google Scholar
Brown, R. (1973). A first language. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1960). Rules and representations. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Dittmar, N. (1982). Semantic features of pidginized learner varieties of German. Unpublished manuscript. Free University of Berlin.Google Scholar
Dulay, H. C., & Burt, M. K. (1973). Should we teach children syntax? Language Learning, 23, 245–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dulay, H. C., & Burt, M. K. (1974). Natural sequences in child second language acquisition. Language Learning, 24, 37–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dulay, H. C., & Burt, M. K. (1976). Creative construction in second language learning and teaching. Language Learning, Special Issue, 4, 65–79.Google Scholar
Fodor, J. A. (1983). Modularity of mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foster, S. (1985). Divide and rule: On taking a modular approach to universals of language acquisition. Paper presented at the Los Angeles Second Language Research Forum.Google Scholar
Givon, T. (1979). On understanding grammar. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Hatch, E., & Hawkins, B. (in press). Second language acquisition, An interactive approach. In Rosenberg, S. (Ed.), Advances in applied psycholinguistics, Vol. 2. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kelly, P. (1983). The question of uniformity in interlanguage development. In Bailey, K. M., Long, M. H., & Peck, S. (Eds.), Second language acquisition studies (pp. 83–92). Cambridge, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Klein, W. (1981). Knowing a language and knowing to communicate: A case study in foreign workers' communication. In Vermeer, A. R. (Ed.), Language problems of minority groups (pp. 75–95). Tilberg: Tilberg Studies in Language and Literature.Google Scholar
Kumpf, L. (1979). A semantic analysis of aspect in Miguel's interlanguage. Unpublished manuscript, University of California at Los Angeles, Applied Linguistics Program.Google Scholar
Kumpf, L. (1981). An approach to tense–aspect–modality in the analysis of interlanguage. Unpublished manuscript, University of California at Los Angeles, Applied Linguistics Program.Google Scholar
Kumpf, L. (1982). Temporal systems and universality in interlanguage: A case study. In Eckman, F. R., Bell, L. H., & Nelson, D. (Eds.), Universals of second language acquisition. Cambridge, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Lin, Y. Y. (1982). An error analysis of the fossilized interlanguage of a Chinese speaker of English. Unpublished manuscript. University of California at Los Angeles, Program for Teaching English as a Second Language.Google Scholar
Noble, S. (1979). An interlanguage analysis. Unpublished manuscript. University of California at Los Angeles, Program for Teaching English as a Second Language.Google Scholar
Perdue, C. (Ed.). (1984). Second language acquisition by adult immigrants: A field manual. Cambridge, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Schumann, J. H. (1978). The pidginization process: A model for second language acquisition. Cambridge, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Schumann, J. H. (1982). Simplification, transfer, and relexification as aspects of pidginization and early second language acquisition. Language Learning, 32, 337–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schumann, J. H. (in press a). Utterance structure in basilang speech. In Gilbert, G. (Ed.), Pidgin and creole languages: Essays in memory of John E. Reinecke. Hawaii: University of Hawaii Press.Google Scholar
Schumann, J. H. (in press b). Locative and directional expressions in basilang speech. Language Learning, 36(3).Google Scholar
Stauble, A. (1978). The process of decreolization: A model for second language development. Language Learning, 28, 29–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stabule, A. (1981). A comparative study of a Spanish-English and Japanese-English second language continuum: Verb phrase morphology. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of California at Los Angeles.Google Scholar
Stauble, A., & Schumann, J. H. (1983). Toward a description of the Spanish-English basilang. In Bailey, K. M., Long, M. H., & Peck, S. (Eds.), Second language acquisition studies (pp. 68–82). Cambridge, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
von Stutterheim, C. (1982). A concept-oriented approach to second-language studies. Paper presented at the Second European-North American Workshop on Cross-Linguistic Second Language Acquisition Research, Gohrde/Hamburg, West Germany.Google Scholar