Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-s22k5 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-11T19:26:36.979Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Effect of Graphic Representation of Knowledge Structures on ESL Reading Comprehension

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 November 2008

Gloria Tang
Gloria Tang
Affiliation:
University of British Columbia
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Research suggests that English as a second language (ESL) students take upwards of 5 years to acquire a level of proficiency in academic language that is comparable to their English-speaking peers. They are likely to be denied full access to school knowledge unless teachers help to bring about student content knowledge learning and second language acquisition simultaneously.

Type
Articles
Information
Studies in Second Language Acquisition , Volume 14 , Issue 2 , June 1992 , pp. 177 - 195
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Alvermann, D. E. (1981). The compensatory effect of graphic organizers on descriptive text. The Journal of Educational Research, 75, 44–49.Google Scholar
Alvermann, D. E. (1982). Restructuring text facilitates written recall of main ideas. Journal of Reading, 25, 754–758.Google Scholar
Armbruster, B. B., & Anderson, T. H. (1980). The effect of mapping on the free recall of expository text (Technical Report No. 160). Urbana-Champaign: University of Illinois, Center for the Study of Reading. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 192 735)Google Scholar
Armbruster, B. B., Anderson, T. H., & Ostertag, J. (1987). Does text structure/summarization instruction facilitate learning from expository text? Reading Research Quarterly, 22, 331–346.Google Scholar
Ausubel, D. P. (1968). Educational psychology: A cognitive view. New York: Hoff, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
Bartlett, B. J. (1979). Top level text organizational strategy for recall of text (Doctoral dissertation, Arizona State University, 1978). Dissertation Abstracts International, 39, 6641A.Google Scholar
Berkowitz, S. J. (1986). Effects of instruction in text organization on sixth-grade students' memory for expository reading. Reading Research Quarterly, 21, 161–178.Google Scholar
Boothby, P. R., & Alvermann, D. E. (1984). A classroom training study: The effects of graphic organizer instruction on fourth graders' comprehension. Reading World, 23(4), 325–339.Google Scholar
Borg, W. R., & Gall, M. D. (1979). Educational research, an introduction. New York: Longman.Google Scholar
Burnaby, B. (1987). Language for native, ethnic or recent immigrant groups: What's the difference. TESL Canada Journal, 4(2), 9–27.Google Scholar
Carrell, P. L. (1982). Cohesion is not coherence. TESOL Quarterly, 16, 478–488.Google Scholar
Carrell, P. L. (1985). Facilitating ESL reading by teaching text structure. TESOL Quarterly, 19, 724–752.Google Scholar
Carrell, P. L., Pharis, B. G., & Liberto, J. C. (1989). Metacognitive strategy training for ESL reading. TESOL Quarterly, 23, 647–678.Google Scholar
Christensen, L. B. (1985). Experimental methodology (3rd ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
Collier, V. P. (1987). Age and rate of acquisition of second language for academic purposes. TESOL Quarterly, 21, 617–641.Google Scholar
Connor, U. (1984). Recall of text: Differences between first and second language readers. TESOL Quarterly, 18, 239–256.Google Scholar
Cummins, J. (1984). Bilingualism and special education: Issues in assessment and pedagogy. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual matters.Google Scholar
Cummins, J. (1989). Empowering minority students. Sacramento: California Association for Bilingual Education.Google Scholar
Dana, C. M. (1980). The effects of using a graphic advance organizer before, during, and after reading on the comprehension of written text: A study conducted with sixth grade students. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Wisconsin, Madison.Google Scholar
Dansereau, D. F. (1979). Development and evaluation of a learning strategy training program. Journal of Educational Psychology, 71, 64–73.Google Scholar
Early, M., Thew, C., & Wakefield, P. (1986). Integrating language and content instruction K-12: An ESL resource book (Vol. 1). Victoria, BC: Ministry of Education, Modern Languages Services Branch.Google Scholar
Geva, E. (1983). Facilitating reading through flowcharting. Reading Research Quarterly, 18, 384–404.Google Scholar
Hawk, P. P. (1986). Using graphic organizers to increase achievement in middle school life science. Science Education, 70, 81–87.Google Scholar
Heimlich, J. E., & Pittelman, C. D. (1986). Semantic mapping: Classroom applications. Newark, DE: International Reading Association.Google Scholar
Holliday, W. G. (1975). What's in a picture? The Science Teacher, 42, 21–22.Google Scholar
Holliday, W. G. (1976). Teaching verbal chains using flow diagrams and texts. A-V Communication Review, 24, 63–78.Google Scholar
Koran, M. L., & Koran, J. (1980). Interaction of learner characteristics with pictorial adjuncts in learning from science text. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 17, 477–483.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krashen, S. D. (1985). The input hypothesis. New York: Longman.Google Scholar
Levie, W. H., & Lentz, R. (1982). Effects of text illustrations: A review of research. Educational Communication and Technology, 30, 195–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levin, J. R., Anglin, G. J., & Carney, R. N. (1987). On empirically validating functions of pictures in prose. In Willows, D. M. & Houghton, H. A. (Eds.), The psychology of illustration (Vol. 1, pp. 51–85). New York: Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meyer, B. J. F. (1985). Prose analysis: Purpose, procedures and problems. In B., Britton & J., Black (Eds.), Understanding expository text (pp. 269–285). Hillsdale, NJ: Eribaum.Google Scholar
Mohan, B. A. (1986). Language and content. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
Mohan, B. A. (1990, 09). LEP students and the integration of language and content Knowledge structures and tasks. Paper presented at the national research symposium on LEP students' issues of the US Department of Education, Office of Bilingual Education, Research and Evaluation, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Neering, R., Usukawa, S., & Wood, W. (1986). Exploring our world: Other people, other lands. Vancouver, BC: Douglas & Mclntyre.Google Scholar
Paivio, A. (1971). Imagery and verbal processes. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
Reichardt, C. S. (1979). The statistical analysis of data from nonequivalent group designs. In Cook, T. D. & Campbell, D. T. (Eds.), Quasi-experimentation design and analysis issues for field settings (pp. 147–202). Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Schallert, D. L. (1980). The role of illustrations in reading comprehension. In Spiro, D. T., Bruce, B. C., & Brewer, W. F. (Eds.), Theoretical issues in reading comprehension: Perspectives from cognitive psychology, linguistics, artificial intelligence, and education (pp. 503–524). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Tang, G. M. (1989). Graphic representation of knowledge structures in ESL student lirning. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of British Columbia, Vancouver.Google Scholar
Taylor, B. M., & Beach, R. W. (1984). The effects of text structure instruction on middle grade students' comprehension and production of expository text. Reading Research Quarterly, 19, 134–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winn, W. D. (1980). The effect of block-word diagrams on the structuring of science concepts as a function of general ability. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 17, 201–211.Google Scholar
Winn, W. D. (1987). Charts, graphs and diagrams in educational materials. In Willows, D. M. & Houghton, H. A. (Eds.), The psychology of illustrations (Vol. 1, pp. 152–198). New York: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
Winn, W. D., & Holliday, W. G. (1981, 04). Learning from diagrams: Theoretical and instructional considerations. Paper presented at the annual convention of the Association for Educational Communication and Technology, Philadelphia. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 207 518)Google Scholar