Hostname: page-component-cc8bf7c57-77pjf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-11T23:06:12.301Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

CONTEXT OF LEARNING IN THE ACQUISITION OF SPANISH SECOND LANGUAGE PHONOLOGY

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 April 2004

Manuel Díaz-Campos
Manuel Díaz-Campos
Affiliation:
Indiana University, Bloomington
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Studies in SLA have debated the importance of context of learning in the process of developing linguistic skills in a second language (L2). The present paper examines whether study abroad, as it provides opportunities for authentic L2 context, facilitates the acquisition of Spanish phonology. The corpus of this investigation is composed of speech samples from 46 students of Spanish: 26 studying abroad in Spain and 20 in a regular classroom environment in the United States. The students read a paragraph with 60 target words including segments such as word-initial stops (i.e., [p t k]),Throughout the article a phonetic representation of all sounds following the International Phonetic Alphabet (IPA) is presented. Phonetic (instead of phonological) representations avoid making assumptions about underlying L2 representations. intervocalic fricatives (i.e., [ ]), word-final laterals (i.e., [l]), and palatal nasals (i.e., ). The findings reveal the following patterns for both regular classroom and study abroad students across time: (a) similar gain in the case of voiced initial stops and word-final laterals, (b) lack of gain in the case of intervocalic fricatives, and (c) high levels of accuracy in the case of the palatal nasal in the pretest. Concerning the external data, the following factor groups predicted phonological gain among all learners: years of formal language instruction, reported use of Spanish before the semester, reported use of Spanish outside the classroom during the semester (days), reported use of Spanish outside the classroom during the semester (hours), gender, entrance Oral Proficiency Interview, exit Oral Proficiency Interview, and level at which formal instruction began.

Type
Research Article
Information
Studies in Second Language Acquisition , Volume 26 , Issue 2 , June 2004 , pp. 249 - 273
Copyright
© 2004 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

I am very grateful to Joseph Collentine, Barbara F. Freed, and Norman Segalowitz for their comments and suggestions on an earlier version of this article. I also would like to express my thanks to the anonymous SSLA reviewers for their careful reading and useful insights. I would like to thank Nicole Lazar for her comments and help in running a preliminary statistical analysis of the data. Randall Halter of Concordia University in Montreal was instrumental in providing technical support for digitizing the read-aloud materials. I appreciate Randall's work very much. I would also like to thank James Lee, Kimberly Geeslin, and Richard File for reading a previous version of this paper and providing me with comments. Last but not least, I want to thank the Council on International Education Exchange for providing the funds to Freed to coordinate the teamwork regarding language gain in different contexts of learning. All errors are my own.

References

REFERENCES

Archibald, J. (1998a). Second language phonology. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Archibald, J. (1998b). Second language phonology, phonetics, and typology. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 20, 189–211.Google Scholar
Armstrong, G. (1981). Effects of an intensive foreign study program on attitudes and Spanish language skills. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Indiana University, Bloomington.
Barrutia, R., & Schwegler, A. (1994). Fonética y fonología españolas [Spanish phonetics and phonology]. New York: Wiley.
Barrutia, R., & Terrell, T. (1982). Fonética y fonología españolas [Spanish phonetics and phonology]. New York: Wiley.
Berdan, R. (1996). Disentangling language acquisition from language variation. In R. Bayley & D. Preston (Eds.), Second language acquisition and linguistic variation (pp. 203–244). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Bernhardt, B., & Stemberger, J. (1998). Handbook of phonological development: From the perspective of constraint-base nonlinear phonology. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Best, C. (1995). A direct-realist view of cross-language speech perception. In W. Strange (Ed.), Speech perception and linguistic experience: Issues in cross-language speech research (pp. 171–206). Timonium, MD: York Press.
Bongaerts, T., van Summeren, C., Planken, B., & Schils, E. (1997). Age and ultimate attainment in the pronunciation of foreign language. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19, 447–465.Google Scholar
Brecht, R. (1993a). Predictors of foreign language gain during study abroad. Washington, DC: National Foreign Language Center.
Brecht, R. (1993b). Qualitative analysis of second language acquisition in study abroad. Washington, DC: National Foreign Language Center.
Brecht, R., Davidson, D., & Ginsberg, R.. (1995). Predictors of foreign language gain during study abroad. In B. F. Freed (Ed.), Second language acquisition in a study abroad context (pp. 37–66). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Broselow, E., Chen, S., & Wang, C. (1998). The emergence of the unmarked in second language phonology. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 20, 261–280.Google Scholar
Carlisle, R. (1998). The acquisition of onsets in a markedness relationship: A longitudinal study. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 20, 245–260.Google Scholar
Cedergren, H., & Sankoff, D. (1974). Variable rules: Performance as a statistical reflection of competence. Language, 50, 333–355.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N., & Halle, M. (1968). The sound pattern of English. New York: Harper & Row.
Dalbor, J. (1997). Spanish pronunciation: Theory and practice. New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.
Díaz-Campos, M., & Lazar, N. (2003). Acoustic analysis of voiceless initial stops in the speech of study abroad and regular class students: Context of learning as a variable in Spanish second language acquisition. In P. Kempchinsky & C.-E. Piñeros (Eds.), Theory, practice, and acquisition: Papers from the 6th Hispanic Linguistics Symposium and the 5th Conference on the Acquisition of Spanish and Portuguese (pp. 352–370). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.
Díaz-Campos, M., Lazar, N., Freed, B. F., Segalowitz, N., Lafford, B., & Collentine, J. (2002, October). Acoustic analysis of voiceless initial stops in the speech of study abroad and regular class students. Paper presented at the 5th Conference on the Acquisition of Spanish, Iowa City.
Eckman, F. (1987). Markedness and the contrastive analysis hypothesis. In G. Ioup & S. Weinberger (Eds.), Interlanguage phonology (pp. 55–69). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
Ellis, R. (1994). The study of second language acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Flege, J. (1987). The production of new and similar phones in a foreign language: Evidence for the effect of equivalence classification. Journal of Phonetics, 15, 47–65.Google Scholar
Flege, J., & Eefting, W. (1988). Imitation of a VOT continuum by native speakers of English and Spanish. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 83, 729–740.Google Scholar
Flege, J., Frieda, E., Walley, A., & Randazza, L. (1998). Lexical factors and segmental accuracy in L2 speech production. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 20, 155–187.Google Scholar
Fowler, C. (1986). An event approach to the study of speech perception from a direct-realist perspective. Journal of Phonetics, 14, 3–28.Google Scholar
Freed, B. F. (1995). Language learning and study abroad. In B. F. Freed (Ed.), Second language acquisition in a study abroad context (pp. 3–33). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Geeslin, K. (2002). The acquisition of Spanish copula choice and its relationship to language change. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 24, 419–450.Google Scholar
González-Bueno, M. (1997). Voice onset time in the perception of foreign accent by native listeners of Spanish. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 35, 251–267.Google Scholar
Hammond, R. (2001). The sounds of Spanish. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.
Harris, J. (1969). Spanish phonology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Jakobson, R. (1968). Child language aphasia and phonological universals. The Hague: Mouton.
Labov, W. (1966). The social stratification of English in New York City. Arlington, VA: Center for Applied Linguistics.
Labov, W. (1969). Contraction, deletion, and inherent variability of the English copula. Language, 45, 715–762.Google Scholar
Labov, W. (1972). Sociolinguistic patterns. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Lafford, B. (1995). Getting into, through, and out of a survival situation. In B. F. Freed (Ed.), Second language acquisition in a study abroad context (pp. 97–121). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Lapkin, S., Hart, D., & Swain, M. (1995). A Canadian interprovincial exchange: Evaluating the linguistic impact of a three-month stay in Quebec. In B. F. Freed (Ed.), Second language acquisition in a study abroad context (pp. 67–94). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Leather, J. (1999). Phonological issues in language learning. Oxford: Blackwell.
Liberman, A., Cooper, F., Shankweiler, D., & Studdert-Kennedy, M. (1967). Perception of the speech code. Psychological Review, 74, 431–461.Google Scholar
Liberman, A., & Mattingly, I. (1985). The motor theory of speech perception revised. Cognition, 21, 1–36.Google Scholar
Liberman, A., & Mattingly, I. (1989). A specialization for speech perception. Science, 245, 489–494.Google Scholar
Lord, G. (2000). The combined benefits of instruction and immersion on L2 pronunciation. Unpublished manuscript, University of Florida, Gainesville.
Lord, G. (2002, October). Can we teach foreign language pronunciation? Paper presented at the 5th Conference on the Acquisition of Spanish, Iowa City.
Major, R. (1987). A model for interlanguage phonology. In G. Ioup & S. Weinberger (Eds.), Interlanguage phonology: The acquisition of second language sound system (pp. 101–124). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
Major, R. (1998). Interlanguage phonetics and phonology: An introduction. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 20, 131–137.Google Scholar
McCarthy, J., & Prince, A. (1993). Prosodic morphology 1: Constraint interaction and satisfaction. Unpublished manuscript, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, and Rutgers University.
McCarthy, J., & Prince, A. (1995). Faithfulness and reduplicative identify. University of Massachusetts Occasional Papers, 18, 249–384.Google Scholar
Michaels, D. (1974). Sound replacement and phonological systems. Linguistics, 176, 69–81.Google Scholar
Mohanan, K. P. (1986). The theory of lexical phonology. Dordrecht: Reidel.
Moyer, A. (1999). Ultimate attainment in L2 phonology. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 21, 81–108.Google Scholar
Navarro-Tomás, T. (1967). Manual de pronunciación española [Manual of Spanish pronunciation]. Madrid: Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas.
Pintzuk, S. (1988). VARBRUL programs [software]. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Department of Linguistics.
Piske, T., MacKay, I., & Flege, J. (2001). Factors affecting degree of foreign accent in an L2: A review. Journal of Phonetics, 29, 191–215.Google Scholar
Prince, A., & Smolensky, P. (1993). Optimality theory: Constraint interaction in generative grammar. Unpublished manuscript, Rutgers University and University of Colorado, Boulder.
Quilis, A., & Fernández, J. (1979). Curso de fonética y fonología españolas para estudiantes angloamericanos [Course of Spanish phonetics and phonology for Anglo-American students]. Madrid: Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas.
Rand, D., & Sankoff, D. (1990). GoldVarb 2.0 [software]. Montreal: University of Montreal.
Riney, T., & Flege, J. (1998). Changes over time in global foreign accent and liquid identifiability and accuracy. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 20, 213–243.Google Scholar
Sankoff, D. (1998). Variable rules. In U. Ammon, N. Dittmar, & K. J. Mattheier (Eds.), Sociolinguistics: An international handbook of the science of language and society (pp. 984–997). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Siegel, D. (1974). Topics in English morphology. Unpublished manuscript, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge.
Silva-Corvalán, C. (1989). Sociolingüística: Teoría y análisis [Sociolinguistics: Theory and analysis]. Madrid: Alhambra.
Silva-Corvalán, C. (2001). Sociolingüística y pragmática del español [Sociolinguistics and pragmatics of Spanish]. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
Simões, A. (1996). Phonetics in second language acquisition: An acoustic study of fluency in adult learners of Spanish. Hispania, 79, 87–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stampe, D. (1979). A dissertation on natural phonology. New York: Garland.
Stemberger, J., & Bernhardt, B. (1999). The emergence of faithfulness. In B. MacWhinney (Ed.), The emergence of language (pp. 417–446). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Suter, R. (1976). Predictors of pronunciation accuracy in second language learning. Language Learning, 26, 233–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tarone, E. (1982). Systematicity and attention in interlanguage. Language Learning, 32, 69–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tarone, E. (1983). On the variability of interlanguage systems. Applied Linguistics, 4, 142–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Teschner, R. (2000). Camino oral [Oral route]. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Wodak, R., & Benke, G. (1998). Gender as a sociolinguistic variable: New perspectives on variation studies. In F. Coulmas (Ed.), The handbook of sociolinguistics (pp. 127–167). Oxford: Blackwell.
Young, R., & Bayley, R. (1996). VARBRUL analysis for second language acquisition research. In R. Bayley & D. Preston (Eds.), Second language acquisition and linguistic variation (pp. 253–306). Amsterdam: Benjamins.