Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T17:28:37.193Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Beyond output: the analysis of interlanguage development1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 November 2008

Kurt Kohn
Kurt Kohn
Affiliation:
Universität Konstanz
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

One of the main challenges faced by second langague acquisition research is to find an answer to the question of which processes and strategies guide the learner's attempt to acquire a foreign language. Whereas most investigations are based on the learner's output, this paper argues in favor of a more comprehensive approach. It tries to close the speculative gap between output and the underlying processes by integrating three types of questions:

(a) What requirements do learners impose on their own interlanguage output?

(b) What linguistic knowledge concerning the fulfillment of their requirements do learners have stored in their memories?

(c) What linguistic forms do learners actually use in their interlanguage output and how do these comply with their underlying knowledge?

An analysis which goes beyond the bounds of output by combining what learners want with what they know along with what they produce leads to insights into their interlanguage processes.

Quantitative procedures are introduced which measure learners' knowledge with respect to their requirement of correctness and also the extent to which their output complies with what they know. Three empirical studies are presented. They demonstrate that an analysis which combines information about requirements, knowledge and output can deal effectively with some of the dynamic aspects of interlanguage behavior.

Type
Articles
Information
Studies in Second Language Acquisition , Volume 4 , Issue 2 , Spring 1982 , pp. 137 - 152
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1982

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bausch, K. R., and Kasper, G.. 1979. Der Zweitsprachenerwerb: Möglichkeiten und Grenzen der “großen” Hypothesen. Linguistische Berichte 64. 3–35.Google Scholar
Bialystok, E. 1979. The role of conscious strategies in second language proficiency. Canadian Modern Language Review 35 (3). 372–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, N. 1965. Aspects of the theory of syntax. Cambridge, Ma.: M.I.T. Press.Google Scholar
Cohen, A. 1981. Introspecting about second language learning. Paper presented at the 6th International Congress of Applied Linguistics, Lund, Sweden, August 9–15.Google Scholar
Cohen, A., and Aphek, E.. 1981. Easifying second language learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 3 (2). 221–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corder, S. P. 1967. The significance of learners' errors. International Review of Applied Linguistics 5. 161–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hakuta, K., and Cancino, H.. 1977. Trends in second-language-acquisition research. Harvard Educational Review 47(3). 294–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kellerman, E. 1974. Elicitation, lateralization and error analysis. York Papers in Linguistics 4. 165–89.Google Scholar
Kellerman, E., 1978. Giving learners a break: Native language intuitions as a source of predictions about transferability. Working Papers on Bilingualism 15. 59–92.Google Scholar
Kintsch, W. 1970. Models for free recall and recognition. Models of human memory, ed. by Norman, D. A., 333–73. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Kleinmann, H. H. 1977. Avoidance behavior in adult second language acquisition. Language learning 27(1). 93–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kohn, K. 1979. Was der Lerner nicht weiß, macht ihn nicht heiß. Linguistische Berichte 64. 82–94.Google Scholar
Kohn, K., 1981. Englisch als Fremdsprache. Eine linguistische Perspektive. Anglistentag 1980 Giessen. Tagungsbeiträge, ed. by Grabes, H., 293–331. Grossen-Linden: Hoffmann.Google Scholar
Krashen, S. 1976. Formal and informal linguistic environments in language acquisition and language learning. TESOL Quarterly 10(2). 175–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krashen, S., 1977. The monitor model for adult second language performance. Viewpoints on English as a second language, ed. by Burt, M., Dulay, H. and Finocchiaro, M., 152–61. New York: Regents.Google Scholar
Oiler, J. W. 1976. Evidence for a general language proficiency factor: An expectancy grammar. Die Neueren Sprachen 25. 165–74.Google Scholar
Selinker, L. 1972. Interlanguage. International Review of Applied Linguistics 10. 219–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spolsky, B. 1973. What does it mean to know a language; or how do you get someone to perform his competence? Focus on the learner, ed. by Oller, J. W., and Richards, J. C., 164–76. Rowley, Ma.: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Taylor, I. 1978. Acquiring vs. learning a second language. Canadian Modern Language Review 34 (3). 455–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vollmer, H. J., and Sang, F.. 1980. Zum psychologischen Konstrukt einer internalisierten Erwartungsgrammatik. Linguistik und Didaktik 42. 123–48.Google Scholar