Hostname: page-component-f554764f5-qhdkw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-18T22:53:31.978Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

THE ROLES OF PHONOLOGICAL SHORT-TERM MEMORY AND WORKING MEMORY IN L2 GRAMMAR AND VOCABULARY LEARNING

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 August 2012

Katherine I. Martin  and
Nick C. Ellis
Katherine I. Martin*
Affiliation:
University of Michigan
Nick C. Ellis
Affiliation:
University of Michigan
*
*Correspondence regarding this work should be addressed to Katherine Martin, Department of Linguistics, 2832 Cathedral of Learning, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, 15260; e-mail: [email protected].
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This study analyzed phonological short-term memory (PSTM) and working memory (WM) and their relationship with vocabulary and grammar learning in an artificial foreign language. Nonword repetition, nonword recognition, and listening span were used as memory measures. Participants learned the singular forms of vocabulary for an artificial foreign language before being exposed to plural forms in sentence contexts. Participants were tested on their ability to induce the grammatical forms and to generalize the forms to novel utterances. Individual differences in final abilities in vocabulary and grammar correlated between 0.44 and 0.76, depending on the measure. Despite these strong associations, the results demonstrated significant independent effects of PSTM and WM on L2 vocabulary learning and on L2 grammar learning, some of which were mediated by vocabulary and some of which were direct effects.

Type
ARTICLES
Information
Studies in Second Language Acquisition , Volume 34 , Issue 3 , September 2012 , pp. 379 - 413
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

Adams, A. M., & Gathercole, S. E. (1996). Phonological working memory and spoken language development in young children. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 49, 216–233.Google Scholar
Adams, A. M., & Gathercole, S. E. (2000). Limitations in working memory: Implications for language development. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 35, 95–116.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Arbuckle, J. L. (2006). Amos (Version 7.0) [Computer software]. Chicago: SPSS.Google Scholar
Audacity Team. (2008). Audacity (Version 1.2.6) [Computer software]. Retrieved September 7, 2008, fromhttp://audacity.sourceforge.net.Google Scholar
Baddeley, A. D. (1998). Working memory. C.R. Académie des sciences Paris, Sciences de la Vie / Life Sciences, 321, 167–173.Google ScholarPubMed
Baddeley, A. D. (2003). Working memory and language: An overview. Journal of Communication Disorders, 36, 189–208.Google Scholar
Baddeley, A. D., Gathercole, S. E., & Papagno, C. (1998). The phonological loop as a language learning device. Psychological Review, 105, 158–173.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baddeley, A. D., & Hitch, G. (1974). Working memory. In Bower, G. A. (Ed.), Recent advances in learning and motivation (Vol. 8, pp. 47–90). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Baddeley, A. D., Papagno, C., & Vallar, G. (1988). When long-term learning depends on short-term storage. Journal of Memory and Language, 27, 586–595.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bates, E., & Goodman, J. C. (1997). On the inseparability of grammar and the lexicon: Evidence from acquisition, aphasia and real-time processing. Language and Cognitive Processes, 12, 507–584.Google Scholar
Birdsong, D., & Molis, M. (2001). On the evidence for maturational constraints in second-language acquisition. Journal of Memory and Language, 44, 235–249.Google Scholar
Brooks, P. J., Braine, M. D. S., Catalano, L., Brody, R. E., & Sudhalter, V. (1993). Acquisition of gender-like noun subclasses in an artificial language: The contribution of phonological markers to learning. Journal of Memory and Language, 32, 76–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, R. (1973). A first language: The early stages. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1957). Syntactic structures. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1965). Aspects of the theory of syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Collins, L., & Ellis, N. C. (Eds.). (2009). Input and second language construction learning: Frequency, form, and function [Special issue]. Modern Language Journal, 93, 329–335.Google Scholar
Daneman, M., & Carpenter, P. A. (1980). Individual differences in working memory and reading. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 19, 450–466.Google Scholar
Daneman, M., & Case, R. (1981). Syntactic form, semantic complexity, and short-term memory: Influences on children’s acquisition of new linguistic structures. Developmental Psychology, 17, 367–378.Google Scholar
DeKeyser, R. M. (2005). What makes learning second-language grammar difficult? A review of issues. Language Learning, 55, 1–25.Google Scholar
Ellis, N. C. (1996). Sequencing in SLA: Phonological memory, chunking, and points of order. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 18, 91–126.Google Scholar
Ellis, N. C. (2008). Phraseology: The periphery and the heart of language. Preface to Meunier, F. & Granger, S. (Eds.), Phraseology in language learning and teaching (pp. 1–13). Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar
Ellis, N. C., & Cadierno, T. (Eds.). (2009). Constructing a second language: Introduction to the special section. Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 7, 111–290.Google Scholar
Ellis, N. C., & Sinclair, S. G. (1996). Working memory in the acquisition of vocabulary and syntax: Putting language in good order. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 49, 234–250.Google Scholar
Fan, M. Y. (2003). Frequency of use, perceived usefulness, and actual usefulness of second language vocabulary strategies: A study of Hong Kong learners. Modern Language Journal, 87, 222–241.Google Scholar
Fortkamp, M. B. M. (1999). Working memory capacity and aspects of L2 speech production. Communication & Cognition, 32, 259–296.Google Scholar
French, L. M. (2006). Phonological working memory and second language acquisition: A developmental study of Francophone children learning English in Quebec. Lewiston, NY: Edwin Mellen Press.Google Scholar
French, L. M., & O’Brien, I. (2008). Phonological memory and children’s second language grammar learning. Applied Psycholinguistics, 29, 463–487.Google Scholar
Friederici, A. D., Steinhauer, K., & Pfeifer, E. (2002). Brain signatures of artificial language processing. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 99, 529–534.Google Scholar
Gathercole, S. E., & Baddeley, A. D. (1993). Working memory and language. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Gathercole, S. E., Pickering, S. J., Hall, M., & Peaker, S. M. (2001). Dissociable lexical and phonological influences on serial recognition and serial recall. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 54, 1–30.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gleitman, L. (1990). The structural source of verb meaning. Language Acquisition, 1, 3–55.Google Scholar
Goldberg, A. E. (1995). Constructions: A construction grammar approach to argument structure. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Harrington, M., & Sawyer, M. (1992). L2 working memory capacity and L2 reading skill. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 14, 25–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haywood, J. A., & Nahmad, H. M. (1965). A new Arabic grammar of the written language. London: Lund Humphries.Google Scholar
Johnson, J. S., & Newport, E. L. (1989). Critical period effects in second language learning: The influence of maturational state on the acquisition of English as a second language. Cognitive Psychology, 21, 60–99.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jones, G., Gobet, F., & Pine, J. M. (2007). Linking working memory and long-term memory: A computational model of the learning of new words. Developmental Science, 10, 853–873.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jones, G., Gobet, F., & Pine, J. M. (2008). Computer simulations of developmental change: The contributions of working memory capacity and long-term knowledge. Cognitive Science, 32, 1148–1176.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Just, M. A., & Carpenter, P. A. (1992). A capacity theory of comprehension: Individual differences in working memory. Psychological Review, 99, 122–149.Google Scholar
Katz, J. J., & Postal, P. M. (1964). An integrated theory of linguistic descriptions. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
King, G. (2003). Modern Welsh: A comprehensive grammar. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kormos, J., & Sáfár, A. (2008). Phonological short-term memory, working memory and foreign language performance in intensive language learning. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 11, 261–271.Google Scholar
Leeser, M. J. (2007). Learner-based factors in L2 reading comprehension and processing grammatical form: Topic familiarity and working memory. Language Learning, 57, 229–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mackey, A. (2006). From introspections, brain scans, and memory tests to the role of social context: Advancing research on interaction and learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 28, 369–379.Google Scholar
Mackey, A., Philp, J., Egi, T., Fujii, A., & Tatsumi, T. (2002). Individual differences in working memory, noticing of interactional feedback, and L2 development. In Robinson, P. (Ed.), Individual differences in instructed language learning (pp. 181–209). Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar
Marchman, V. A., & Bates, E. (1994). Continuity in lexical and morphological development: A test of the critical mass hypothesis. Journal of Child Language, 21, 339–366.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Marton, K., & Schwartz, R. G. (2003). Working memory capacity and language processes in children with specific language impairment. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 46, 1138–1153.Google Scholar
Masoura, E. V., & Gathercole, S. E. (1999). Phonological short-term memory and foreign language learning. International Journal of Psychology, 34, 383–388.Google Scholar
O’Brien, I., Segalowitz, N., Collentine, J., & Freed, B. (2006). Phonological memory and lexical, narrative, and grammatical skills in second language oral production by adult learners. Applied Psycholinguistics, 27, 377–402.Google Scholar
O’Brien, I., Segalowitz, N., Freed, B., & Collentine, J. (2007). Phonological memory predicts second language oral fluency gains in adults. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 29, 557–582.Google Scholar
Opitz, B., & Friederici, A. D. (2004). Brain correlates of language learning: The neuronal dissociation of rule-based versus similarity-based learning. Journal of Neuroscience, 24, 8436–8440.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Papagno, C., Valentine, T., & Baddeley, A. D. (1991). Phonological short-term memory and foreign-language vocabulary learning. Journal of Memory and Language, 30, 331–347.Google Scholar
Paradis, M. (1994). Neurolinguistic aspects of implicit and explicit memory: Implications for bilingualism and SLA. In Ellis, N. C. (Ed.), Implicit and explicit learning of languages (pp. 393–420). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Pawley, A., & Syder, F. H. (1983). Two puzzles for linguistic theory: Nativelike selection and nativelike fluency. In Richards, J. C. & Schmidt, R. W. (Eds.), Language and communication (pp. 191–225). London: Longman.Google Scholar
Pinker, S. (1991). Rules of language. Science, 253, 530–535.Google Scholar
Polomé, E. (1967). Swahili language handbook. Washington, DC: Center for Applied Linguistics.Google Scholar
Robinson, B. F., Mervis, C. B., & Robinson, B. W. (2003). The roles of verbal short-term memory and working memory in the acquisition of grammar by children with Williams syndrome. Developmental Neuropsychology, 23, 13–31.Google Scholar
Robinson, P. (2002). Effects of individual differences in intelligence, aptitude, and working memory on adult incidental SLA: A replication and extension of Reber, Walkenfield, and Hernstadt (1991). In Robinson, P. (Ed.), Individual differences in instructed language learning (pp. 181–209). Amsterdam: Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, P., & Ellis, N. C. (Eds.). (2008). Handbook of cognitive linguistics and second language acquisition. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Römer, U. (2009). The inseparability of lexis and grammar: Corpus linguistic perspectives. Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 7, 140–162.Google Scholar
Sanaoui, R. (1995). Adult learners’ approaches to learning vocabulary in second languages. Modern Language Journal, 79, 15–28.Google Scholar
Schneider, W., Eschman, A., & Zuccolutto, A. (2002). E-Prime reference guide. Pittsburgh, PA: Psychology Software Tools, Inc.Google Scholar
Service, E. (1992). Phonology, working memory, and foreign-language learning. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 45, 21–50.Google Scholar
Service, E., & Kohonen, V. (1995). Is the relation between phonological memory and foreign language learning accounted for by vocabulary acquisition? Applied Psycholinguistics, 16, 155–172.Google Scholar
Sinclair, J. (1991). Corpus, concordance, collocation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sinclair, J. (2004). Trust the text: Language, corpus and discourse. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Speidel, G. E. (1993). Phonological short-term memory and individual differences in learning to speak: A bilingual case study. First Language, 13, 69–91.Google Scholar
Sunderman, G., & Kroll, J. F. (2009). When study-abroad experience fails to deliver: The internal resources threshold effect. Applied Psycholinguistics, 30, 79–99.Google Scholar
Thorn, A. S. C., & Gathercole, S. E. (1999). Language-specific knowledge and short-term memory in bilingual and non-bilingual children. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 52, 303–324.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thorn, A. S. C., & Gathercole, S. E. (2001). Language differences in verbal short-term memory do not exclusively originate in the process of subvocal rehearsal. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 8, 357–364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turner, M. L., & Engle, R. W. (1989). Is working memory capacity task dependent? Journal of Memory and Language, 28, 127–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ullman, M. T. (2001). The neural basis of lexicon and grammar in first and second language: The declarative/procedural model. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 4, 105–122.Google Scholar
Ullman, M. T. (2005). A cognitive neuroscience perspective on second language acquisition: The declarative/procedural model. In Sanz, C. (Ed.), Mind and context in adult second language acquisition: Methods, theory and practice (pp. 141–178). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
van den Noort, M. W. M. L., Bosch, P., & Hugdahl, K. (2006). Foreign language proficiency and working memory capacity. European Psychologist, 11, 289–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, J. N. (2012). Working memory and SLA. In Gass, S. & Mackey, A. (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of second language acquisition. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Williams, J. N., & Lovatt, P. (2003). Phonological memory and rule learning. Language Learning, 53, 67–121.Google Scholar