Hostname: page-component-6bf8c574d5-fppsw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-14T11:52:27.088Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

LANGUAGE ACQUISITION AND LINGUISTIC THEORY, Susan L. Tavakolian, ed. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1981. Pp. 233.

Review products

LANGUAGE ACQUISITION AND LINGUISTIC THEORY, Susan L. Tavakolian, ed. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1981. Pp. 233.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 November 2008

Michael Maratsos
Michael Maratsos
Affiliation:
Institute of Child Development
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Reviews
Information
Studies in Second Language Acquisition , Volume 7 , Issue 1 , February 1985 , pp. 109 - 112
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bever, T. G. 1970. The cognitive basis for linguistic structures. In Hayes, J. R. (ed.). Cognition and the development of language. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Bowerman, M. 1979. The acquisition of complex sentences. In Fletcher, P. & Gorman, M. (eds.), Language acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bresnan, J. 1978. A realistic transformational grammar. In Halle, M., Miller, G. A., and Bresnan, J. (eds.), Linguistic theory and psychological reality. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, C. 1969. Acquisition of syntax in children from 5 to 10. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Maratsos, M., & Kuczaj, S. A. II, 1978. Against the transformationalist hypothesis: A simpler account of redundant tense markings. Journal of Child Language 5; 337–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar