Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T14:11:08.189Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

L2 ENGLISH INTONATION

Relations between Form-Meaning Associations, Access to Meaning, and L1 Transfer

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 May 2014

Marta Ortega-Llebaria  and
Laura Colantoni
Marta Ortega-Llebaria*
Affiliation:
University of Pittsburgh
Laura Colantoni
Affiliation:
University of Toronto
*
*Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Marta Ortega-Llebaria, University of Pittsburgh, Department of Linguistics, 2830 Cathedral of Learning, 4200 Fifth Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15260. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Although there is consistent evidence that higher levels of processing, such as learning the form-meaning associations specific to the second language (L2), are a source of difficulty in acquiring L2 speech, no study has addressed how these levels interact in shaping L2 perception and production of intonation. We examine the hypothesis of whether access to contextual meaning increases the chances of first language (L1) influence on L2 intonation. To test this hypothesis, we compared the perception and production of sentential English focus by 27 advanced English language learners (n = 13 L1 Mandarin speakers; n = 14 L1 Spanish speakers) and 13 controls, through a series of tasks that promoted different levels of access to meaning. Results showed that L1 transfer was especially clear in Spanish speakers. Not only did they consistently differ from controls in their perception of focalized verbs and subjects, showing their L1 bias to perceive focus at the end of a sentence, but they were also the only group of speakers that inserted pauses after the focalized word, which showed strong L1 effects. Moreover, these L1 transfer effects were more obvious in contextualized tasks, which indicated that facilitating access to meaning by adding context increased L1 transfer effects on the perception and especially on the production of focus intonation.

Type
Articles
Information
Studies in Second Language Acquisition , Volume 36 , Issue 2: Beyond Segments: Prosody in SLA , June 2014 , pp. 331 - 353
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

This research has been supported by a SSHRC grant (890-2011-0049) to both authors, a Victoria College research grant to Laura Colantoni, and a research grant from Arts and Sciences College, University of Pittsburgh, to Marta Ortega-Llebaria. The authors want to thank Charlotte Rogers, Julia Sandoval, Anita Rao, Lexi Williams, Olivia Marasco, and Matt Patience for their assistance during the creation of the materials, subject testing, and data labeling.

References

REFERENCES

Best, C. (1994). The emergence of native language phonological influence in infants: A perceptual assimilation model. In Goodman, J. & Nusbaum, H. (Eds.), The development of speech perception: Transition from speech sounds to spoken words (pp. 167–264). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Best, C., & Tyler, M. (2007). Nonnative and second language speech perception: Commonalities and complementarities. In Bohn, O. & Munro, M. (Eds.), Language experience in second language learners (pp. 13–34). Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Benjamins.Google Scholar
Blicher, D. L., Diehl, R. L., & Cohen, L. B. (1990). Effects of syllable duration on the perception of Mandarin tone 2/tone 3 distinction: Evidence of auditory enhancement. Journal of Phonetics, 18, 37–49.Google Scholar
Boersma, P., & Weenink, D. (2010). Praat: Doing phonetics by computer (Version 5.1.43) [Computer software]. Retrieved from http://www.praat.org/ Google Scholar
Bolinger, D. (1989). Intonation and its uses. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Chen, A., Rietveld, T. C. M., & Gussenhoven, C. (2001). Language-specific effects of pitch range on the perception of universal intonational meaning. In Dalsgaard, P., Lindberg, B., Benner, H., & Tan, Z.-H. (Eds.), EUROSPEECH-2001 (pp. 1403–1406). Retrieved from http://www.isca-speech.org/archive/eurospeech_2001/e01_1403.html Google Scholar
Cruttenden, A. (1997). Intonation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Cruz-Ferreira, M. (1984). Perception and interpretation of non-native intonation patterns. In van der Broecke, M. P. R. & Cohen, A. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 10th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences (pp. 565–569). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Foris.Google Scholar
Cruz-Ferreira, M. (1989). A test for non-native comprehension of intonation in English. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 27, 23–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dupoux, E., Pallier, C., Sebastián-Gallés, N., & Mehler, J. (1997). A destressing “deafness” in French? Journal of Memory and Language, 36, 406–421.Google Scholar
Dupoux, E., Peperkamp, S., & Sebastián-Gallés, N. (2001). A robust method to study stress “deafness.” Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 110, 1606–1618.Google Scholar
Dupoux, E., Peperkamp, S., & Sebastián-Gallés, N. (2010). Limits on bilingualism revisited: Stress “deafness” in simultaneous French-Spanish bilinguals. Cognition, 114, 266–275.Google Scholar
Dupoux, E., Sebastián-Gallés, N., Navarrete, E., & Peperkamp, S. (2008). Persistent stress “deafness”: The case of French learners of Spanish. Cognition, 106, 682–706.Google Scholar
Face, T. (2001). Focus on peak alignment in Spanish intonation. Probus, 13, 233–246.Google Scholar
Flege, J. E. (1995). Second language speech learning: Theory, findings, and problems. In Strange, W. (Ed.), Speech perception and linguistic experience: Issues in cross-language research (pp. 233–277). Timonium, MD: York Press.Google Scholar
Flege, J., & Frieda, E. (1997). Amount of native language use (L1) affects the pronunciation of an L2. Journal of Phonetics, 25, 169–186.Google Scholar
Grabe, E., Rosner, B. S., García-Albea, J. E., & Zhou, X. (2003). Perception of English intonation by English, Spanish, and Chinese listeners. Language and Speech, 46, 375–401.Google Scholar
Gussenhoven, C. (2004). The phonology of tone and intonation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Howie, J. M. (1976). Acoustical studies of Mandarin vowels and tones. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ladd, R. (2008). Intonational phonology. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Liu, F. (2009). Intonation systems of Mandarin and English: A functional approach (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Chicago.Google Scholar
McGory, J. T. (1997). Acquisition of intonational prominence in English by Seoul Korean and Mandarin Chinese speakers (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). The Ohio State University, Columbus.Google Scholar
Meyer, M. (1969). Frog, where are you? New York, NY: Dial Press.Google Scholar
Nava, E., & Zubizarreta, E. (2009). Order of L2 acquisition of prosodic prominence patterns: Evidence from L1 Spanish/L2 English speech. In Crawford, J., Otaki, K., & Takahashi, M. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 3rd Conference on Generative Approaches to Language Acquisition North America (GALANA 2008) (pp. 175–187). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Nenonen, S., Shestakova, A., Huotilainen, M., & Näätänen, R. (2003). Linguistic relevance of duration within native language determines the accuracy of speech-sound duration processing. Cognitive Brain Research, 16, 492–495.Google Scholar
Nenonen, S., Shestakova, A., Huotilainen, M., & Näätänen, R. (2005). Speech-sound duration processing in a second language is specific to phonetic categories. Brain and Language, 92, 26–32.Google Scholar
Piske, T., MacKay, I. R. A., & Flege, J. E. (2001). Factors affecting degree of foreign accent in an L2: A review. Journal of Phonetics, 29, 191–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pisoni, D. B., Lively, S. E., & Logan, J. S. (1994). Perceptual learning of non-native speech contrasts: Implications for theories of speech perception. In Goodman, J. & Nusbaum, H. (Eds.), The development of speech perception (pp. 121–166). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Toledo, G. (1989). Señales prosódicas de foco [Prosodic focus marking]. Revista Argentina de lingüística, 5, 205–230.Google Scholar
Vallduví, E. (1991). The role of plasticity in the association of focus and prominence. In No, Y. & Libucha, M. (Eds.), ESCOL ’90: Proceedings of the Seventh Eastern State Conference in Linguistics (pp. 295–306). Columbus, OH: The Ohio State University.Google Scholar
Wang, B., & Xu, Y. (2011). Differential prosodic encoding of topic and focus in sentence-initial position in Mandarin Chinese. Journal of Phonetics, 39, 595–611.Google Scholar
Watson, D. G., Arnold, J. E., & Tanenhaus, M. K. (2008). Tic tac toe: Effects of predictability and importance on acoustic prominence in language production. Cognition, 106, 1548–1557.Google Scholar
Werker, J. F., & Tees, R. C. (1984). Cross-language speech perception: Evidence for perceptual reorganization during the first year of life. Infant Behavior & Development, 7, 49–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Werker, J. F., & Tees, R. C. (2002). Cross-language speech perception: Evidence for perceptual reorganization during the first year of life. Infant Behavior & Development, 25, 121–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Xu, L. (2004). Manifestation of informational focus. Lingua, 114, 277–299.Google Scholar
Xu, Y. (1999). Effects of tone and focus on the formation and alignment of F0 contours. Journal of Phonetics, 27, 55–105.Google Scholar
Xu, Y. (2001). Fundamental frequency peak delay in Mandarin. Phonetica, 58, 26–52.Google Scholar
Yip, M. (2002). Tone. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Zubizarreta, M. L. (1998). Prosody, focus, and word order. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Zubizarreta, M. L., & Nava, E. (2011). Encoding discourse-based meaning: Prosody vs. syntax. Implications for second language acquisition. Lingua, 121, 652–669.Google Scholar