Crossref Citations
This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by
Crossref.
SLABAKOVA, ROUMYANA
2000.
L1 transfer revisited: the L2 acquisition of telicity marking in English by Spanish and Bulgarian native speakers.
Linguistics,
Vol. 38,
Issue. 4,
Teutsch-Dwyer, Marya
2001.
Multilingualism, Second Language Learning, and Gender.
p.
175.
EBSWORTH, MIRIAM EISENSTEIN
2002.
Comment.
International Journal of the Sociology of Language,
Vol. 2002,
Issue. 155-156,
Slabakova, Roumyana
2002.
Recent research on the acquisition of aspect: an embarrassment of riches?.
Second Language Research,
Vol. 18,
Issue. 2,
p.
172.
Chaudron, Craig
2003.
The Handbook of Second Language Acquisition.
p.
762.
Slabakova, Roumyana
and
Montrul, Silvina
2003.
Genericity and Aspect in L2 Acquisition.
Language Acquisition,
Vol. 11,
Issue. 3,
p.
165.
Jin, Limin
and
Hendriks, Henriette
2004.
Le marquage de l’aspect en chinois LM et LE.
Acquisition et interaction en langue étrangère,
p.
51.
Collins, Laura
2004.
The Particulars on Universals: A Comparison of the Acquisition of Tense-Aspect Morphology among Japanese- and French-Speaking Learners of English.
The Canadian Modern Language Review,
Vol. 61,
Issue. 2,
p.
251.
Ishida, Midori
2004.
Effects of Recasts on the Acquisition of the Aspectual Form ‐te i‐(ru) by Learners of Japanese as a Foreign Language.
Language Learning,
Vol. 54,
Issue. 2,
p.
311.
DeKeyser, Robert M.
2005.
What Makes Learning Second‐Language Grammar Difficult? A Review of Issues.
Language Learning,
Vol. 55,
Issue. S1,
p.
1.
Collins, Laura
2005.
Accessing Second Language Learners’ Understanding of Temporal Morphology.
Language Awareness,
Vol. 14,
Issue. 4,
p.
207.
Guijarro-Fuentes, Pedro
2005.
Tiempo y Aspecto: estudio comparativo entre nativos y no-nativos de nivel avanzado de español.
Hispanic Research Journal,
Vol. 6,
Issue. 2,
p.
99.
Clachar, Arlene
2005.
Creole English Speakers’ Treatment of Tense‐Aspect Morphology in English Interlanguage Written Discourse.
Language Learning,
Vol. 55,
Issue. 2,
p.
275.
Van Rooy, Bertus
2006.
The extension of the progressive aspect in Black South African English.
World Englishes,
Vol. 25,
Issue. 1,
p.
37.
Shirai, Yasuhiro
2007.
The Aspect Hypothesis, the comparative fallacy and the validity of obligatory context analysis: a reply to Lardiere, 2003.
Second Language Research,
Vol. 23,
Issue. 1,
p.
51.
Lee, EunHee
and
Kim, Hae‐Young
2007.
On Crosslinguistic Variations in Imperfective Aspect: The Case of L2 Korean.
Language Learning,
Vol. 57,
Issue. 4,
p.
651.
Casillas, Gabriela
2008.
The insufficiency of three types of learning to explain language acquisition.
Lingua,
Vol. 118,
Issue. 4,
p.
636.
박선희
2009.
A Study on the Korean progressive acquisition of L1 Chinese learners.
Bilingual Research,
Vol. null,
Issue. 41,
p.
139.
Spada, Nina
and
Tomita, Yasuyo
2010.
Interactions Between Type of Instruction and Type of Language Feature: A Meta‐Analysis.
Language Learning,
Vol. 60,
Issue. 2,
p.
263.
Vaezi, Shahin
and
Alizadeh, Mehrasa
2011.
How learners cope with English tenses: Evidence from think-aloud protocols.
Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences,
Vol. 29,
Issue. ,
p.
986.