Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-f46jp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-24T12:23:41.621Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Acquisition Strategies in Language Death

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 November 2008

Marion Lois Huffines
Marion Lois Huffines
Affiliation:
Bucknell University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Nonsectarian Pennsylvania Germans who are the first generation in their families to learn English natively, often attempt to learn the Pennsylvania German that their families no longer regularly use. This study assesses the process of acquiring a dying language by investigating learners' use of the Pennsylvania German dative case. Learning strategies are remarkably free of reliance on English rules. Evidence indicates that speakers rely on what they have learned and seek analogies within Pennsylvania German, resorting to English only when other strategies fail. The search for near-congruity identified as operative across languages operates within the learner language as internal analogy. Learners also seek to maximize the distance between English and Pennsylvania German and emphasize the distinctiveness of each.

Type
Articles
Information
Studies in Second Language Acquisition , Volume 13 , Issue 1 , March 1991 , pp. 43 - 55
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anderson, K. O., & Martin, W. (1976). Language loyalty among the Pennsylvania Germans: A status report on Old Order Mennonites in Pennsylvania and Ontario. In Albrecht, E. A. & Burzle, J. A. (Eds.), Germanica-Americana. 1976 (pp. 73–80). Lawrence: University of Kansas.Google Scholar
Costello, J. R. (1978). Syntactic change and second language acquisition: The case for Pennsylvania German. Linguistics, 213, 29–50.Google Scholar
Dorian, N. C. (1980). Language shift in community and individual: The phenomenon of the laggard semi-speaker. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 25, 85–94.Google Scholar
Dorian, N. C. (1981). Language death: The life cycle of a Scottish Gaelic dialect. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Enninger, W. (1979). Language convergence in a stable triglossia plus trilingualism situation. In Freese, P., Freywald, C., Paprotte, W., & Real, W. (Eds.), Anglistik: Beiträge zur Fachwissenschaft und Fachdidaktik (pp. 43–63). Münster: Regensberg.Google Scholar
Enninger, W. (1980). Syntactic convergence in a stable triglossia plus trilingualism situation in Kent County, Delaware, USA. In Nelde, H. P. (Ed.), Sprachkontakt und Sprachkonflikt (pp. 343–350). Zeitschrift für Dialektologie und Linguistik, Beiheft 32. Wiesbaden: Franz Steiner.Google Scholar
Huffines, M. L. (1980). Pennsylvania German: Maintenance and shift. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 25, 43–57.Google Scholar
Huffines, M. L. (1988). Lexical borrowing and linguistic convergence in Pennsylvania German. Yearbook for German-American Studies, 23, 59–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huffines, M. L. (1989). Case usage among the Pennsylvania German sectarians and nonsectarians. In Dorian, N. C. (Ed.), Investigating obsolescence: Studies in language contraction and death (pp. 211–226). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huffines, M. L. (1990, Spring). Pennsylvania German in public life. Pennsylvania Folklife, 39, 117–125.Google Scholar
Kloss, H. (1985). Die Stellung des deutschen Elements in den Abstammungs- und Sprächzahlungen der Jahre 1969–1980. In Kloss, H. (Ed.), Deutsch als Muttersprache in den Vereinigten Staaten, Teil II (pp. 259–273). Stuttgart: Franz Steiner Verlag.Google Scholar
Kraybill, D. B. (1989). The riddle of Amish culture. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Schmidt, A. (1985). Young people's Dyirbal. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Tarone, E. (1977). Conscious communication strategies in interlanguage: A progress report. In Brown, D., Yorio, C., & Crymes, R. (Eds.), On TESOL 77 (pp. 194–203). Washington, DC: Teaching English to Speakers of Other Languages (TESOL).Google Scholar
Tarone, E., Cohen, A. D., & Dumas, G. (1983). A closer look at some interlanguage terminology: A framework for communication strategies. In Faerch, C. & Kasper, G. (Eds.), Strategies in interlanguage communications (pp. 4–14). London: Longman.Google Scholar
Tsitsipis, L. D. (1981). Language change and language death in Albanian speech communities in Greece: A sociolinguistic study. Unpublished PhD dissertation, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin.Google Scholar
Zobl, H. (1980). The formal and developmental selectivity of L1 influence on L2 acquisition. Language Learning, 30, 43–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar