Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T16:10:31.606Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Varieties of Uniformity: The First Century of the Church of Ireland

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 March 2016

Aidan Clarke
Aidan Clarke*
Affiliation:
Trinity College, Dublin
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The historiographical background to this paper is provided by a recent dramatic change of perspective in the study of the Reformation in Ireland. Traditionally the failure of Protestant reform has been explained in ways that amounted to determinism. In its crudest expression, this involved the self-sufficient premise that the Catholic faith was so deeply ingrained in the Irish as to be unshakable. More subtly, it assumed a set of equations, of Protestantism with English conquest and Catholicism with national resistance, that acted to consolidate the faith. In the 1970s, these simplicities were questioned. Dr Bradshaw and Dr Canny argued that religious reform had made sufficient headway in its initial phase to suggest that the replacement of Catholicism by Protestantism was at least within the bounds of possibility, and raised a fresh question; why did this not happen? That the debate which followed was inconclusive was due in part to an inability to shake off an old habit of circular thought, so that the issue has remained one of deciding whether Protestantism failed because Catholicism succeeded, or Catholicism succeeded because Protestantism failed. Both Dr Robinson-Hammerstein, when she observed that ‘Ireland is the only country in which the Counter-Reformation succeeded against the will of the Head of State’, and Dr Bottigheimer, when he insisted that the failure of the Reformation must ‘concentrate our attention on the nature and limits of political authority’, implied that what needs to be explained is how actions were deprived of their effect. The alternative possibility is that the actions themselves were inherently ineffectual. The premise of this paper is that the failure of Protestantism and the success of Catholicism were the necessary condition, but not the sufficient cause, of each other, and its object is simply to recall attention to the existence of very practical reasons why the Church of Ireland should have evolved as it did in the hundred years or so between the first and second Acts of Uniformity, that is, from an inclusive Church, claiming the allegiance of the entire community, to one that excluded all but a privileged minority.

Type
Research Article
Information
Studies in Church History , Volume 25: The Churches, Ireland and the Irish , 1989 , pp. 105 - 122
Copyright
Copyright © Ecclesiastical History Society 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Hammerstein-Robinson, H.. ‘The Continental Education of Irish students in the reign of Queen Elizabeth I’, Historical studia, 8, ed. Williams, T. Desmond (Dublin, 1971), p. 153.Google Scholar

2 Bottigheimer, Karl, ‘The failure of the Reformation in Ireland: une question bien posée ’, JEH, 36 (1986), p. 207.Google Scholar

3 Shirley, E. P., Original Letters and Papers (London, 1851), p. 174.Google Scholar

4 Jones, F. M., The Counter-Reformation (Dublin, 1967), pp. 11–13.Google Scholar

5 The figure includes O Finely of Leighlin who took the oath in England in 1559. CalSPI 1509-73, P. 154.

6 Morrin, J. (ed.), Calendar of the Patent and Close Rolls of Chancery in Ireland, of the reigns of Henry VIII, Edward, VI, Mary, , and Elizabeth, (Dublin, 1861), pp. 377, 472.Google Scholar

7 2 Eliz cap. 1, 4.

8 2 Eliz cap. 2.

9 A brefe Declaration of certein Principall Articles of Religion (Dublin, 1566/7). Reprinted in C. R. Elrington, The Life of the Most Rev. James Ussher (Dublin, 1848), Appendix 3, pp. xx-xxix.

10 Parker’s ‘Eleven Articles’ were converted into twelve by numbering the two paragraphs of Article XI separately. Otherwise, the formularies are identical. Charles Hardwick. A History of the Articles of Religion (Cambridge, 1859), pp. 120-3, 181-2, 337-9.

11 Shirley, Original Letters, pp. 203-5.

12 Ibid., pp. 214-21.

13 Ellington, Life of Ussher, Appendix 4, pp. xxxi-l. Alan Ford, The Protestant Reformation in Ireland, 1590-1641 (Frankfurt am Main, 1985), pp. 194-201. R. Buick Knox, James Ussher, Archbishop of Armagh (Cardiff, 1967), pp. 16-23.

14 SirCroft, James, ‘A Discourse for the Reformation of Ireland’, Irish Manuscripts Commission, Analecta Hibernica, 4 (Dublin, 1931), p. 315 Google Scholar. J. Lodge (ed.), Desiderata Curiosa Hibernica, 2 vols (Dublin, 1772), 2, pp. 28-9. J. W. Stubbs, Archbishop Adam Loftus and the foundation of Trinity College, Dublin (Dublin, 1892), pp. 4-5. W. A Phillips (ed.), History of the Church of Ireland, 3 vols (Oxford, 1933-4), 2, p. 421.

15 [Travers, Walter], Ecclesiasticus Discipline (Heidelburg, 1574), p. 144.Google Scholar

16 Kearney, H. F., Scholars and Gentlemen (London, 1970), pp. 66–70 Google Scholar. Ford, Protestant Reformation, pp. 76-9.

17 Kildare (1560, 1564), Armagh (1562), Meath (1563), and Dublin (1567).

18 Edwards, R. D., Church and State in Tudor Ireland (Dublin, 1935), pp. 187–90.Google Scholar

19 Sir Henry Sidney’s words: Shirley, Original Letters, p. 265.

20 Ronan, M. V., The Reformation in Ireland under Elizabeth, 1558-80 (Dublin, 1930), p. 214 Google Scholar. Moran, P. F., History of the Catholic Archbishops of Dublin (Dublin, 1864), p. 86.Google Scholar

21 Bradshaw, B., ‘Sword, word and strategy in the Reformation in Ireland’, HJ, 21 (1978), pp. 475–502 CrossRefGoogle Scholar. Canny, N., ‘Why the Reformation failed in Ireland: une question mal posée ’, JEH, 30 (1979), pp. 423–50 Google Scholar. Bortigheimer, ‘The failure of the Reformation’, pp. 196-207.

22 Irish Manuscripts Commission: Calendar of the Irish Patent Rolls of James I (Dublin, 1966), pp. 396, 399.

23 Bagwell, Richard, Ireland under the Tudors, 3 vols (London, 1885-90), 3, pp. 131–5.Google Scholar

24 Brady, W. M. (ed.). State Papers concerning the Irish Church in the time of Queen Elizabeth (London, 1868), pp. 93–6.Google Scholar

25 Shirley, Original Letters, pp. 95-7, 106-8, 122-3.

26 Brady, State Papers, ppl. 25, 115. Exemptions had been granted to the Archbishops of Dublin and Armagh.

27 Shirley, Original Letters, pp. 194-7.

28 Brady, State Papers, pp. 14-19.

29 Shirley, Original Letters, pp. 317-20. Analecla Hibernica, 4, p. 300.

30 Shirley, Original Letters, p. 162.

31 Brady, State Papers, p. 16.

32 Shirley, Original Letters, pp. 317-20.

33 Brady, State Papers, p. 33.

34 Ibid., p. 94.

35 Phillips, Church of Ireland, 2, pp. 345, 350.

36 ‘Book of Entry of divers reports and letters concerning the state of die Kingdom of Ireland upon the view of certain Commissioners sent thither by King James in the year 1622’, BL MS 4756, f. 19.

37 Nicholas White co Cecil, 10 March 1569, P.R.O., S.P., Ire., 63/27.44.

38 BL MS 4756, f.21v.

39 Shirley, Original letters, pp. 236-7.

40 Ibid., pp. 189, 317-21.

41 BL MS 4756, f. 21v

42 Brady, State Papers, p. 111.

43 Ibid., p. 94.

44 Shirley, Original Letters, p. 296.

45 Even David Wolfe conceded the point: “they go perforce to the communion and sermons of the heretics’, he reported. Ronan, Reformation in Ireland, p. 480.

46 Bossy, John, ‘The Counter-Reformation and the people of Catholic Ireland’, Historical Studies, 8, pp. 155–70 Google Scholar. Clarke, Aidan, ‘Colonial Identity in early seventeenth-century Ireland’, Moody, T. W. (ed.), Historical Studies 11: Nationality and the Pursuit of National Independence (Belfast, 1978).pp-57–72.Google Scholar

47 12 Eliz cap. 1.

48 Shirley, Original Letters, pp. 292, 298.

49 Ibid., pp. 265-6, 271.

50 Brady, State Papers, p. 32.

51 11 Eliz cap. 6.

52 Brady, State Papers, p. 41.

53 Bolster, E., A History of the Diocese of Cork from the Reformation to the Penal Era (Cork, 1982), p. 72.Google Scholar

54 Brady, State Papers, p. 31.

55 Moran, P. F. (ed.), Spicilegium Ossoriense (Dublin, 1874), pp. 32–8 Google Scholar. Hogan, E. (ed.), Ibernia Ignatiana (Dublin, 1880), p. 13.Google Scholar

56 Shirley, Original letters, pp. 162, 201-2, 256.

57 Moran, Spiciiegium Ossoriense, pp. 32-8.

58 Ford, Protestant Reformation, p. 78.

59 BL MS 4756, f. 19.

60 Ford, Protestant Reformation, cap. 8.

61 Kilroy, Philomena, ‘Puritanism in Ireland in the Seventeenth Century’ (National University of Ireland, MA thesis, 1973)Google Scholar; ‘Sermons and Pamphlet Literature in die Irish Reformed Church’, Archivium Hibernicum, 2 (1975), pp. 110-21.

62 Ford, Protestant Reformation, cap. 5,7.

63 Kearney, H. F., Strafford in Ireland, 1633-41 (Manchester, 1959)Google Scholar, cap. 10. Buick Knox, James Ussher, pp. 44-53. T. W. Moody, F. X. Martin, F.J. Byrne (eds), A New History of Ireland, 3, pp. 256-9.

64 Archbishop Ussher feared a canonical equivalent to Poyning’s Act, ‘giving the Church of England such superintendence over us, that nothing shall be law here that was not first allowed there, and afterward, that we must reform nothing here, that there had obtained a confirmation’. F. R. Bolton, The Caroline Tradition in the Church of Ireland (London, 1958), pp. 13-14.

65 Arguments exploiting the diversity of Protestant opinion, familiar in England from the work of Robert Parsons, were most systematically employed in Ireland by Henry Fitzsimons, S.J. For a succinct example, see Words of comfort to Persecuted Catholics, ed. E. Hogan (Dublin, 1881), pp. 13-15.

66 17/18 Car II, session 2, cap. 6.