Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-05T02:50:55.282Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Truth Universally Acknowledged

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 March 2016

Emma Mason
Emma Mason*
Affiliation:
University of London Birkbeck College
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

‘It is a truth universally acknowledged that the practice of religion will be influenced by the social conditions prevailing in any given locality.’ The debate on this statement is largely concentrated for present purposes into a consideration of activities between c1100 and c1250 in two distinctive societies: Westminster abbey and its environs and, in contrast, the city and diocese of Worcester. The essential function of Westminster abbey was, of course, intercessory, and while this role was shared with Worcester cathedral, the latter church had also a wide-ranging pastoral responsibility. In this sense, no exact equation can be made, yet the richness of the records which both churches accumulated presents adequate material for a valid comparison in other respects. It is not intended, and is, indeed, impossible to make an arbitrary definition of Westminster as town and Worcester as countryside. Elements of both were contained in Westminster and Worcester alike.

Type
Research Article
Information
Studies in Church History , Volume 16: The Church in Town and Countryside , 1979 , pp. 171 - 186
Copyright
Copyright © Ecclesiastical History Society 1979

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 [Barbara], Harvey, [‘Work and] Festa Ferianda [in Medieval England’,] JEH 23 (1972) p 301 Google Scholar.

2 Richardson, [H. G.], ‘William of Ely, [the king’s treasurer (? 1195-1215)’], TRHS 4 series, 15 (1932) pp 84-5Google Scholar.

3 [The Cartulary of] Worcester [Cathedral Priory (Register 1), ed Darlington, R.R.] P[ipe] R[oll] S[ociety], ns 38 (1968) p xl Google Scholar.

4 [Barbara], Harvey, Westminster abbey [and its estates in the middle ages] (Oxford 1977) p 73 Google Scholar.

5 Hilton, R. H., A Medieval Society (London 1966) p 41 Google Scholar.

6 See the introduction to my edition of [The] Beauchamp [Cartulary], PRS, ns, forthcoming.

7 Beauchamp, nos 50, 58-60.

8 [The Register of Bishop Godfrey] Giffard, [ed Bund, J. W. Willis], 2, Worcestershire Historical Society 15 (Oxford 1902) p 75 Google Scholar; BL Harley MS 3763, fol 168v.

9 [The Letters and Charters of Gilbert] Foliot, [ed Morey, A. and Brooke, C. N. L.] (Cambridge 1967) nos 2–3 Google Scholar, 5, 22, 35.

10 Worcester, pp xxxij-iij; nos 252, 256.

11 Foliot nos 13, 65.

12 Worcester p lv.

13 Le Neve, 2, pp 99-101.

14 Ibid.

15 Marjorie, Chibnall, ‘Monks and Pastoral Work: a problem in Anglo-Norman History’, JEH 18 (1967), p 168 Google Scholar.

16 [The Chronicle of jocelin of] Brakelond, [transl and ed Butler, H.E.] (London 1949) pp 47-8Google Scholar. In fairness it must be observed that early twelfth-century conciliar decrees debarred monks from pastoral activities - Brooke, [C. N. L.], ‘The missionary at home : [the Church in the towns, 1000-1250’] SCH 6 (1970) p 82 Google Scholar.

17 The Vita Wulfstani of William of Malmesbury, ed Darlington, R. R., CSer, 3 ser, 40 (1928)Google Scholar.

18 Brett, [M.], [The English Church under Henry I] (Oxford 1975) p 117 Google Scholar.

19 Smith, R. A. L., Collected Papers (London 1947) pp 96-7Google Scholar.

20 Worcester no 129.

21 Beauchamp nos 190-92.

22 Brakelond p 27.

23 Anderson, [M. D.], [A Saint at Stake : the strange death of William of Norwich, 1144] (London 1964) pp 44-5Google Scholar.

24 Ibid p 45.

25 Beauchamp nos 183, 197.

26 See my ‘The Mauduits and their chamberlainship [of the Exchequer’], BIHR, 49 (1976) appendix 10, p 23; Westminster abbey muniment no 13845.

27 Anderson pp 45, 125.

28 Brakelond p 40.

29 Urry, W., Canterbury under the Angevin Kings (London 1967) p 165 Google Scholar.

30 [Select Letters of Pope] Innocent III [concerning England (1198-1296), ed Cheney, C.R. and Semple, W. H.] (London 1955) no 26 Google Scholar; Foliot no 264.

31 Cheney, [C. R.], [From Becket to Langton: English Church Government 1170-1213] (Manchester 1956) pp 137-8Google Scholar.

32 Beauchamp nos 187, 189, 209.

33 Anderson pp 70-1.

34 Dyson, A. G., ‘The Monastic Patronage of Bishop Alexander of Lincoln’, JEH, 26 (1975) p 23 Google Scholar.

35 Cheney p 127.

36 Brakelond p 42.

37 Rotuli Hugoms de Welles, ed Phillimore, W. P. W. and Davis, F. N., 2, CYS, 3 (1907) pp 70 Google Scholar, 170.

38 Rotuli Roberti Grosseteste, ed Davis, F. N., CYS, 10 (1913) pp 224 Google Scholar, 375; Calendar of entries in the papal registers relating to Great Britain and Ireland: Papal Letters (1198-1412), 1 (1893) p 366; Rotuli Ricardi Gravesend, ed Davis, F. N., CYS, 31 (1925) p xxiv Google Scholar.

39 Beauchamp no 251.

40 Matthew, Paris, Chronica Majora, ed Luard, H.R., 5, RS (1880) p 731 Google Scholar.

41 Beauchamp no 365. Determination to install his own candidate might even prompt a local lord to expel the current incumbent under threat of death - [The Letters of John of] Salisbury, [1(1153-1161), ed Millor, W.J., Butler, H. E. and Brooke, C. N. L.] (London 1955) no 65 Google Scholar.

42 See my ‘Timeo barones et donas ferentes’, SCH 15 (1978) p 70.

43 Newman, J. E., ‘Greater and lesser landholders and parochial patronage : Yorkshire in the thirteenth century’, EHR, 92 (1977) pp 280–308 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

44 Cheney p 144.

45 Ibid p 138.

46 Ibid p 155.

47 Ibid p 157.

48 Brooke, ‘The missionary at home’, p 64.

49 Harvey, Westminster abbey, pp 45-6.

50 See my ‘The Mauduits and their chamberlainship’, appendix 5, p 19.

51 See my ‘The [role of the] English parishioner, [1100-1500]’, JEH, 27 (1976) p 22.

52 Beauchamp no 205.

53 Ibid no 168.

54 See my ‘The English parishioner’, p 22.

55 Brett p 129.

56 Beauchamp no 65.

57 Innocent III no 9.

58 See my ‘The English parishioner’, pp 18-23.

59 Brooke, [C. N. L.] and [Gillian], Keir, [London 800-1216: the shaping of a city] (London 1975) pp 124-43Google Scholar.

60 Harvey, Westminster abbey, p 39.

61 Westminster abbey muniments, nos 17081, 17322, 17413; Westminster abbey domesday (muniment book 2), fol 546.

62 See my ‘The Mauduits and their chamberlainship’, appendices 6-7, pp 20-1.

63 Harvey, Westminster abbey, pp 37-8.

64 Ibid 38-9.

65 Ibid pp 39-40.

66 Ibid pp 388-92.

67 See my ‘The Mauduits and their chamberlainship’, appendices 8-9, pp 21-3.

68 Ibid appendix 10, p 23.

69 Brooke and Keir p 297.

70 Harvey, Westminster abbey, p 43.

71 Le Neve 2, p 99.

72 Giffard 2, p 8.

73 Ibid p 75.

74 Worcester p xxiv.

75 Anderson, pp 150-1. Writers in the twelfth century occasionally put into the mouths of their more cynical characters the opinion that where no cult existed, it must be created, by fair means or foul, and for what cities such as Winchester or Norwich received, they should be truly thankful - The Chronicle of Richard of Devizes of the time of King Richard the First, ed Appleby, J.T. (London 1963) p 64 Google Scholar; Anderson p 89.

76 Worcester, nos 328, 330. The monks certainly held king John in esteem as a valued if unwitting benefactor. His tomb was lavishly endowed with candles, and the chapter enjoyed a pittance on his anniversary (Ibid no 332).

77 Ibid nos 370, 372, 375.

78 Ibid p xxxix.

79 Brooke and Keir p 336.

80 Ibid p 315.

81 Brett p 122.

82 Richardson, ‘William of Ely’, p 60.

83 In the twelfth century, the knightly class was stratified into a rich minority, whose members might each hold several manors, and a much poorer majority. Members of the latter group were scarcely better off than the more affluent peasants, and their status was gradually declining - Sally, Harvey, ‘The Knight and the Knight’s Fee in England’, PP 49 (1970) pp 3–43 Google Scholar. The former group would clearly not have a residence on every one of their manors, while the latter would not be able to afford a house any more imposing than that of their rustic neighbours.

84 Joan, Evans, Art in Medieval France (Oxford 1948) pp 20-2Google Scholar. In England, survival of such cults is shown by carvings of the Green Man, found on the exterior wall of Ottery St Mary (Devon), for instance.

85 Harvey, ‘Festa Ferianda’, pp 291, 303, 307-8.

86 Foliot nos 3, 22, 35, 77, 85.

87 Chromeon Abbatiae de Evesham, ed Macray, W. D., RS (1863) p 100 Google Scholar.

88 Saltman, A., Theobald archbishop of Canterbury (London 1956) nos 109 Google Scholar, 118. Lower down the social scale, by behaviour even in time of peace could be equally violent. Disgruntled parishioners of Ranworth (Norfolk) bodily removed the church from its site (ibid no 129), while laymen in deepest Yorkshire killed a thief who had stolen their priest’s vestments (Salisbury no 89).

89 ASC, transl and ed Dorothy, Whitelock, Douglas, D. C. and Tucker, Susie I. (London 1961) p 200 Google Scholar.

90 Worcester nos 338-9, 368; Gigard 2, p 8.

91 Worcester Annals, Annales Monastici, ed Luard, H.R, 4, RS (1869) pp 382 Google Scholar, 471, 528.

92 Martindale, A., Gothic Art (London 1967) pp 101-2Google Scholar.

93 Brooke and Keir p 305.

94 Beauchamp nos 183, 197.

95 Worcester no 470.

96 Medieval English Verse, transl Stone, B. (Harmondsworth 1964) pp 230-43Google Scholar. Such poems were, however, capable of allegorisation (ibid p 230).