Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-03T01:27:17.117Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Prescription and Practice: Protestantism and the Upbringing of Children, 1560-1700

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 March 2016

Anthony Fletcher
Anthony Fletcher*
Affiliation:
University of Durhan
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

How children should be brought up is an everlasting question that vexed our forefathers just as much as ourselves. The most obvious difference between most of the thinking and writing that goes on about it today and that of the early modern period is that a largely secular approach has replaced a fundamentally and deeply religious one. So it is natural that the historian of this period should ask how and in what ways Protestantism changed things in this respect. What emerges in facing this issue, in a peculiarly acute form, is the common historical problem of relating prescription to practice. Patrick Collinson has remarked upon the ‘stark contradiction’ between ‘the austere severity of the conduct books and what little can be glimpsed of the real world outside these texts’. It is this contradiction that my paper addresses. I shall approach it as follows. First I will explore the conduct-book advice about parental duty and practice and about children’s obligations to their parents. This provides what we may call the Puritan way of upbringing. I shall relate this to some material from personal sources, like diaries and autobiographies, about what may actually have happened in the home. I will then turn to schooling, which, in its new scale and intensity, can be seen as a crucial social development in Elizabethan and Stuart England, fired in large part by the Protestant evangelizing impulse and its concomitant propaganda of social order. The burgeoning grammar schools, it will be argued, were the principal public instrument of a new and purposeful construction of masculinity.

Type
Research Article
Information
Studies in Church History , Volume 31: The Church and Childhood , 1994 , pp. 325 - 346
Copyright
Copyright © Ecclesiastical History Society 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Collinson, Patrick, The Birthpangs of Protestant England: Religion and Cultural Change in the Sixteenth and Seventeenth Centuries (London, 1988), p. 78 Google Scholar. I am grateful to my wife Tresna and to Elizabeth Foyster for their comments on this paper.

2 Citations from Thomas, K., ‘Age and authority in early modern England’, PBA, 52 (1976), p. 218 Google Scholar; MacDonald, Michael, Mystical Bedlam: Madness, Anxiety, and Healing in Seventeenth-Century England (Cambridge, 1981), p. 43 Google Scholar. See also Sommerville, C. John, The Discovery of Childhood in Puritan England (Athens, Georgia, 1992), p. 189 Google Scholar.

3 Cited in Collinson, , Birthpangs of Protestant England, p. 78 Google Scholar.

4 Gouge, William, Of Domesticall Duties (London, 1622), pp. 545 Google Scholar, 551, 558, 560; Griffith, M., Bethel (1633), p. 366 Google Scholar.

5 E.g. Schuclcing, L. L., The Puritan Family: a Social Study from the Literary Sources (London, 1969 Google Scholar); Todd, Margo, Christian Humanism and the Puritan Social Order (Cambridge, 1987), pp. 96–117 Google Scholar; Davies, Kathleen M., ‘The sacred condition of equality—How original were Puritan doctrines of marriage?’ Social History, 5 (1977), pp. 563–80 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

6 Citations from Hill, Christopher, Society and Puritanism in Pre-Revolutionary England (London, 1964), pp. 452, 455 Google Scholar.

7 Morgan, John, Godly Learning: Puritan Attitudes towards Reason, Learning and Education 1560-1640 (Cambridge, 1986), p. 150 Google Scholar. For a general account see Schucking, , Puritan Family, pp. 56–95 Google Scholar.

8 Gouge, , Domesticall Duties, pp. 436–43 Google Scholar.

9 Dod, J. and Cleaver, R., A Godly Form of Household Government (1614 Google Scholar), sigs Ql, R3.

10 Gouge, , Domesticall Duties, pp. 546–51 Google Scholar; Dod and Cleaver, A Godly Form, sig. Q3.

11 Schnucker, Robert V., ‘Puritan attitudes towards childhood discipline, 1560-1634’, in Fildes, Valerie, ed., Women as Mothers in Pre-Industrial England: Essays in Memory of Dorothy McLaren (London, 1990), pp. 108–16 Google Scholar.

12 Schucking, , Puritan Family, pp. 74–5 Google Scholar.

13 Fildes, , Women as Mothers, p. 117 Google Scholar.

14 Gouge, , Domesticall Duties, pp. 560–1 Google Scholar.

15 Schucking, , Puritan Family, p. 74 Google Scholar.

16 Stone, Lawrence, The Family, Sex and Marriage in England 1500-1800 (London, 1977), pp. 155, 171 Google Scholar.

17 Gouge, , Domesticall Duties, p. 443 Google Scholar.

18 Stone, Family, Sex and Marriage, p. 171.

19 Cliffe, J. T., The Puritan Gentry: The Great Puritan Families of Early Stuart England (London, 1984), pp. 69–70 Google Scholar; Richardson, R. C., Puritanism in North-west England: A Regional Study of the Diocese of Chester to 1642 (Manchester, 1972), pp. 91–2 Google Scholar.

20 Stone, Family, Sex and Marriage, p. 155.

21 Heywood, Thomas, ed., The Diary of Henry Newcome = Chetham Society, 23 (London, 1849 Google Scholar).

22 Collinson, Patrick, The Religion of Protestants: The Church in English Society 1559-1625 (Oxford, 1982), p. 265 Google Scholar.

23 A. J. Fletcher, ‘Oliver Cromwell and the Godly Nation’, in Morrill, J. S., ed., Oliver Cromwell and the English Revolution (London, 1990), p. 214–16 Google Scholar.

24 Todd, , Christian Humanism and the Puritan Social Order, p. 105 Google Scholar.

25 Collinson, , Religion of Protestants, pp. 232–4 Google Scholar.

26 Shahar, Shulamith, Childhood in the Middle Ages (London, 1990), p. 111 Google Scholar.

27 For a general survey see Pollock, Linda A., Forgotten Children: Parent-Child Relations from 1500-1000 (Cambridge, 1983), pp. 143–56 Google Scholar.

28 Parkinson, Richard, ed., The Autobiography of Henry Newcome-Chetham Society, 26 (1852), p. 302 Google Scholar.

29 Macfarlane, Alan, The Family Life of Ralph Josselin: A Seventeenth-Century Clergyman (Cambridge, 1970), pp. 117–25 Google Scholar.

30 Cliffc, Puritan Gentry, pp. 73-4.

31 Cited in Collinson, Birthpangs of Protestant England, pp. 78-9.

32 Stone, , Family, Sex and Marriage, especially pp. 151–218 Google Scholar; Wrightson, Keith, English Society 1580-1680 (London, 1982), pp. 108–18 Google Scholar.

33 Schnucker in Fildes, ed., Women as Mothers, p. 115.

34 Gouge, Domesticall Duties, pp. 565-6.

35 Anthony Fletcher and Stevenson, John, eds., Order and Disorder in Early Modem England (Cambridge, 1985), pp. 1–40 Google Scholar; Measure for Measure, act 1, scene III, lines 23-6.

36 Fletcher, A. J., ‘The Expansion of Education in Berkshire and Oxfordshire 1500-1670’, British Journal of Educational Studies, IS (1967), pp. 52–5 Google Scholar; Cliffe, Puritan Centry, p. 80.

37 Simon, Joan, Education and Society in Tudor England (Cambridge, 1966), pp. 323—6 Google Scholar.

38 O’Day, Rosemary, Education and Society 1500-1800: The Social Foundations of Education in Early Modem Britain (London, 1982), pp. 165–78 Google Scholar.

39 Cited in Fletcher, ‘Expansion of Education’, pp. 57-5.

40 Cited in Simon, Education and Society, p. 329.

41 Cliffe, Puritan Gentry, pp. 79-80.

42 Thomas, Keith, Rule and Misrule in the Schools of Early Modern England (University of Reading, Stenton Lecture, 1975), p. 8 Google Scholar.

43 Chappell, W., The Roxburghe Ballads (Hertford, 1874), 2, pp. 571—2 Google Scholar.

44 O’Day, Education and Society, pp. 49-50.

45 Citations from Thomas, Rule and Misrule, pp. 8-9.

46 Ibid., pp. 9-10.

47 Citations from Pollock, Linda, A Lasting Relationship: Parents and their Children over Three Centuries (London, 1987), pp. 148–9 Google Scholar, 223.

48 Linda Pollock, ‘“Teach her to live under obedience”: the making of women in the upper ranks of early modern England’, Continuity and Change, 4 (1989), p. 238.

49 Katherine Usher Henderson and Barbara F. McManus, Half Humankind: Contexts and Texts of the Controversy about Women in England (Urbana, 1985), pp. 89-90.

50 O’Day, Education and Society, pp. 186-7.

51 Pollock, A Lasting Relationship, p. 223.

52 Suzanne W. Hull, Chaste, Sitent and Obedient: English Books for Women 1475–1640 (San Marino, 1982), pp. 133-43.

53 Jacqueline Eales, ‘Samuel Clarke and the “Lives” of Godly Women in seventeenth-century England’, SCH, 23 (1990), pp. 368-9.

54 P. Stubs, A Cristal Glass for Christian Women (1663).

55 T. Rogers, The Character of a Good Woman (1697), epistle dedicatory.

56 Eales, ‘Samuel Clarke’, p. 371.

57 Rogers, Character of a Good Woman, pp. 24-6.

58 Margaret J. M. Ezell, The Patriarch’s Wife: Literary Evidence and the History of the Family (Chapel Hill, 1987). pp. 132-3.

59 E. Jocclyn, The Mothers Legacy (1625).

60 Pollock, A Lasting Relationship, pp. 249-50.

61 Ibid., p. 226.

62 Ibid., p. 206 and ‘Making of women’, p. 238.

63 Pollock, ‘Making of Women’, pp. 244-5, 256.

64 Pollock, A Lasting Relationship, p. 193.

65 Ian Gibson, The English Vice: Beating, Sex and Shame in Victorian England and After (Duckworth, 1978), p. 12.