No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
The Episcopal Church, the Roman Empire and the Royal Supremacy in Restoration Scotland
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 14 May 2018
Abstract
The churchmen who adhered to the established Church in Scotland during the years from 1661 to 1689, the last period in which it had bishops, have been overlooked by historians in favour of laymen and presbyterian dissenters. This article breaks new ground by examining the episcopalian clergy's attitude to the royal supremacy. To do so, it explores how Scottish episcopalians used the early Church under the Roman empire to illustrate their ideal relationship between Church and monarch. Three phases are evident in their approach. First, it was argued that conformists were, like early Christians, living in proper obedience, while presbyterians were seeking to create a separate jurisdiction in conflict with the king's. Later, Bishop Andrew Honeyman of Orkney tried to put some limitations on the royal supremacy over the Church, arguing that church courts had an independent power of discipline. This became politically unacceptable after the 1669 Act of Supremacy gave the king complete power over the Church, and, in the final phase, the history of the early Church was used to undermine the power of the church courts. The Church under the Roman empire, much like the royal supremacy itself, changed from an instrument to encourage conformity to a means of delegitimizing any clerical opposition to royal policy.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Ecclesiastical History Society 2018
References
1 Airy, Osmund, ed., The Lauderdale Papers, 3 vols (London, 1884–5), 2: 151–3Google Scholar, 263.
2 Jackson, Clare, Restoration Scotland, 1660–1690: Royalist Politics, Religion and Ideas (Woodbridge, 2003)Google Scholar; eadem, ‘Buchanan in Hell: Sir James Turner's Civil War Royalism’, in Caroline Erskine and Roger Mason, eds, George Buchanan: Political Thought in Early Modern Britain and Europe (Farnham, 2012), 205–28.
3 Raffe, Alasdair, Culture of Controversy: Religious Arguments in Scotland, 1660–1714 (Woodbridge, 2012)Google Scholar; idem, ‘Presbyterians and Episcopalians: The Formation of Confessional Cultures in Scotland, 1660–1715’, EHR 125 (2010), 570–98.
4 Erskine, Caroline, ‘The Political Thought of the Restoration Covenanters’, in Adams, Sharon and Goodacre, Julian, eds, Scotland in the Age of Two Revolutions (Woodbridge, 2014), 155–72Google Scholar.
5 However, episcopalian thought earlier in the century has received attention in Mullan, David, Episcopacy in Scotland: The History of an Idea, 1560–1630 (Edinburgh, 1986)Google Scholar.
6 Raffe, Alasdair, ‘The Restoration, the Revolution and the Failure of Episcopacy in Scotland’, in Harris, Tim and Taylor, Stephen, eds, The Final Crisis of the Stuart Monarchy: The Revolutions of 1688–91 in their British, Atlantic and European Context (Woodbridge, 2013), 87–108, at 102–7Google Scholar.
7 Some episcopalian manuscripts were preserved by Wodrow, such as Edinburgh, NLS, MS Wodrow Quarto C, fols 270–4, ‘Some Positions relating to Publick Worship’.
8 Raffe, ‘Presbyterians and Episcopalians’, 575–7.
9 Mullan, David, Scottish Puritanism, 1590–1638 (Oxford, 2000), 259–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
10 Cowan, Ian B., The Scottish Covenanters, 1660–88 (London, 1676), 45–63Google Scholar.
11 Oxford, Bodl., MS Clarendon 75, ‘Information for his Sacrid Matie in order to the setling of the Church of Scotland’, fol. 427r.
12 Wodrow, Robert, The History of the Sufferings of the Church of Scotland, 6 vols (Glasgow, 1828), 1Google Scholar: 230; Records of the Privy Council of Scotland, 3rd ser., ed. P. Hume Brown et al., 16 vols (Edinburgh, 1908–70), 1: 31; ‘Records of the Parliaments of Scotland to 1707’, 1662/5/9, ‘Act for the restitution and reestablishment of the antient government of the church by archbishops and bishops’, 27 May 1662, online at: <http://www.rps.ac.uk>, accessed 6 November 2017.
13 Kyle David Holfelder, ‘Factionalism in the Kirk during the Cromwellian Invasion and Occupation of Scotland: The Protestor-Resolutioner Controversy’ (PhD thesis, University of Edinburgh, 1999).
14 Ramsay, James, Moses Returned from Midian (Edinburgh, 1660)Google Scholar; Menzies, John, Britannia Rediviva (Aberdeen, 1660)Google Scholar; Symson, Matthias, Mephibosheth; or, The Lively Picture of a Loyal Subject (Edinburgh, 1660)Google Scholar; Lawrie, Robert, God Save the King: or, the Loyal and Joyfull Acclamation of Subjects to their King (Edinburgh, 1660)Google Scholar; Scroggie, Alexander, Mirabilia Dei, or Britania Gaudio Exultans (Edinburgh 1660)Google Scholar; Paterson, John, Post Nubila Phoebus, or A Sermon of Thanksgiving (Aberdeen, 1660)Google Scholar.
15 Ramsay, Moses Returned, 10.
16 Ibid. 14–16; Paterson, Post Nubila Phoebus, 4–5, 16-20; Symson, Mephibosheth, 13–16.
17 Menzies, Britannia Rediviva, ‘Epistle Dedicatory’, 2.
18 Symson, Mephibosheth, 7, 21–2; Ramsay, Moses Returned, 12–13; Lawrie, God Save the King, 5, 7; Scroggie, Mirabilia Dei, 10.
19 Menzies, Britannia Rediviva, ‘Epistle Dedicatory’.
20 Ibid. 13–14.
21 Scroggie, Mirabilia Dei, ‘Epistle Dedicatory’, fols 2v–3r.
22 [Honeyman, Andrew], A Survey of the Insolent and Infamous Libel, Entituled Naphtali, &c. . . ., Part 1 (n.pl., 1668), 38–42Google Scholar; Burnet, Gilbert, A Vindication of the Authority, Constitution, and Laws of the Church and State of Scotland (Glasgow, 1673), 53–68;Google Scholar [Gordon, James], The Reformed Bishop: Or, XIX Articles (n.pl., 1679), 92–3Google Scholar.
23 [Honeyman], Survey of Naphtali, 1: 38–42.
24 Burnet, Gilbert, Bishop Burnet's History of his own Time, 6 vols (Edinburgh, 1833), 1: 218Google Scholar; Row, William, The Life of Mr Robert Blair, Minister of St Andrews, containing his Autobiography from 1593 to 1636 with Supplement to his Life and Continuation of the History of the Times to 1680, ed. M'Crie, Thomas (Edinburgh, 1848), 382Google Scholar.
25 Raffe, ‘Restoration, Revolution’, 92–3.
26 [Honeyman, Andrew], The Seasonable Case of Submission to the Church-Government, as now Re-established by Law, Briefly Stated and Determined (Edinburgh, 1662), 29–30Google Scholar.
27 [Honeyman, Andrew], Survey of Naphtali, Part 2 (Edinburgh, 1669)Google Scholar, ‘To the Reader’, fols 1v–2r.
28 Ibid. 82, 84–5.
29 Ibid. 59.
30 Ibid. 96–8; for English views, see Rose, Jacqueline, Godly Kingship in Restoration England: The Politics of the Royal Supremacy, 1660–1688 (Cambridge, 2011), 143–4CrossRefGoogle Scholar, 154–62, 225–7.
31 Edinburgh, NRS, CH2/157/1, Minutes of the presbytery of Fordoun, 1662–1685, 28; The Works of John Knox, ed. David Laing, 6 vols (Edinburgh, 1895), 2: 110; see also Clark, Ivo Macnaughton, A History of Church Discipline in Scotland (Aberdeen, 1929), 56–84Google Scholar.
32 [Honeyman], Survey of Naphtali, 2: 92–3.
33 Ibid. 103–7.
34 Buckroyd, Julia, Church and State in Scotland, 1660–81 (Edinburgh, 1980), 75–84Google Scholar.
35 ‘Records of the Parliaments of Scotland to 1707’, 1669/10/13, ‘Act asserting his majesty's supremacy over all persons and in all causes ecclesiastical’, online at: <http://www.rps.ac.uk>, accessed 8 September 2016.
36 Buckroyd, Church and State, 85–105.
37 Burnet, Vindication, ‘The Collocutors’.
38 Ibid. 358–9; [Burnet, Gilbert], Observations on the First and Second of the Canons, commonly ascribed to the Holy Apostles (Glasgow, 1673)Google Scholar.
39 Burnet, Vindication, 202.
40 Ibid. 219–20.
41 Ibid. 331.
42 Ibid. 196, cf. 307–8.
43 Ibid. 208–9.
44 See, for instance, his discussion of obsolete offices: Burnet, Observations, 107–20.