Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-05T02:52:00.205Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The desanctification of nature

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 March 2016

Philip Sherrard
Philip Sherrard*
Affiliation:
King’s College, university of London
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The theme of the environment is one of the most popular and pressing themes of the present time. Somewhat late in the day we have become aware that we have been blindly secreting around ourselves conditions in which it is increasingly difficult for human or any other life to be lived. We have managed to build up a technological and economic order based on machine production and the possession of material goods which inescapably determines to a greater or lesser degree die lives of all the individuals born into it, reducing a great many of them to a state bordering on panic or hysteria. Indeed, we are told that the only real issue before us in this respect is whether uncontrolled technological destruction or uncontrolled population will be the first to tear the fabric of our civilisation to pieces. In spite of this, in the name of a ‘war on want’ or of developing ‘underdeveloped’ countries, or simply of progress or evolution or efficiency we go on methodically trying to apply on an even more diorough and extensive scale-on a global scale - exactly the same techniques and habits which have brought about the bleakness of our own world - a bleakness which one might describe as resulting at least in part from a desanctification of nature.

Type
Research Article
Information
Studies in Church History , Volume 10: Sanctity and Secularity: The Church and the World , 1973 , pp. 1 - 20
Copyright
Copyright © Ecclesiastical History Society 1973

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Cyril of Alexandria, PG 74 (1863) col 564.

2 Bacon, Francis, Preface to Parasceve, in The Works of Francis Bacon, edd Spedding, J., Ellis, R. L., Heath, D. D. (London 1889) p 393 Google Scholar.

3 Bacon, Francis, Advancement of Learning, ed Wright, W. A. (Oxford 1900) II, 6, iGoogle Scholar.

4 Ibid II, 24,3.

5 Ibid II, 6, i.

6 Descartes, Discourse on Method, 2, trans Veitch, J., The Method, Meditations and Selections from the Principles of Descartes (London 1899) p 19 Google Scholar.

7 Burckhardt, T., ‘Cosmology and Modern Science, Tomorrow (London, Summer 1964)p 186 Google Scholar.

8 Nasr, Seyyed Hossein, The Encounter of Man and Nature (London 1968)Google Scholar passim.

9 Mascall, E., Christian Tlieology and Natural Science (London 1956) p 166 Google Scholar.

10 Berdjaev, N., Tlie Meaning of History (London 1935) p 113 Google Scholar.

11 Col., 1:16; 2:8

12 Meyendorff, J., ‘Orthodox Theology Today’, Sobomost, 6 series, 1 (London 1970) p 16 Google Scholar.

13 Augustine, St, De Diversis Quaestiombus, 83, 46, 1–2 Google Scholar; PL 40 (1887) cols 29-30.

14 See TeSelle, E., ‘Nature and Grace in Augustine’s Expositions of Genesis I, 1-5’, Recherches augusttmennes, 5 (Paris 1968) pp 95–137 Google Scholar.

15 Aquinas, , Summa Theologica, I-II, qu 10, art IGoogle Scholar.

16 Ibid I, i, qu 8 ad 2.

17 Ibid I, qu 21, art 1 ad 3.

18 Aquinas, , De Ventate, ii, 3, obj 19 et ad 19; Summa Theoiogica, 1a, 12, 12Google Scholar.

19 Aquinas, , Contra Gentiles, 1,3 Google Scholar.

20 Whitehead, A. N., Science and the Modern World (New York 1926) p 18 Google Scholar.

21 Augustine, St, Confessions, XII, 6, 6 Google Scholar.

22 Augustine, St, De Genesi ad litteram, I, 4, 9 Google Scholar.

23 See TeSelle, E., Augustine the Tlieohgian (London 1970) pp 143-4Google Scholar.