No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
The ‘Godly Community’ in the Theory and Practice of the European Reformation
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 21 March 2016
Extract
It is now a truism to say that the European Reformation of the sixteenth century brought into being a religion of the word. It arose in literate and learned debate; it was fomented by the printing of written propaganda; it defined itself according to written formulae, including creeds, confessions, and catechisms. It is perhaps almost as generally accepted, and certainly as true, that the ‘Word’ as envisaged by the Reformers was a doctrine based on reasoning and logic, logically expressed, and meant to be understood in an intellectually coherent way. This trait in the aims of the Reformers emerged most obviously when they set about writing catechisms and pieces of pastoral instruction. In his Formula Missae seu Communìonis of 1523, Luther required that
Let [the pastor] not admit the applicants unless they can give a reason for their faith and can answer questions about what the Lord’s Supper is, what its benefits are, and what they expect to derive from it.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Ecclesiastical History Society 1986
References
1 WA 12, p. 215, as translated in Luther’s Works, eds J. Pelikan and H.J. Lehmann (Philadelphia 1943) 53 p. 32.
2 Latin Epistle to Luther’s Shorter Catechism, in Luther, Opera (Wittenberg 1554) 5 fol 647r.
3 Joannis Calvini Opera quae supersunt omnia, eds G. Baum, E. Cunitz, and E. Reuss (Braunschweig Berlin 1863-1900) (hereafter CO) 6, cols 1-134. See also his Institution Puérile, in CO 22 cols 101-114, for the same trait.
4 See for instance Cargill Thompson, W.D.J., The Political Thought of Martin Luther (Brighton 1984) pp. 119–30.Google Scholar
5 Calvin, Institutes IV i 7, 8, 13.
6 As for example by Johann Marbach, in W. Bellardi, Die Geschichte der ‘Christlichen Gemeinschaft’ in Strassburg 1546/1550, der Versuch einer ‘zweiten Reformation’ (Leipzig 1934) p. 193.
7 See above all on this P. Collinson, The Religion of Protestants: The Church in English Society 1559-1625 (Oxford 1982) pp. 189-283.
8 WA 6, pp. 404 seq.
9 Thompson, Cargill, Political Thought of Martin Luther pp. 128–54.Google Scholar
10 WA 12 p. 481.
11 WA 12 pp. 485, 491.
12 WA 12 pp. 215-16.
13 Bomkamm, H., Luther in mid-career 1521-1530, trans E.T. Bachmann (London 1983) p. 120.Google Scholar
14 WA 19 p. 75.
15 Doerne, M., ‘Gottes Volk und Gottes Wort’, Luther-Jahrbuch 14 (1932) pp. 89 Google Scholar seq.
16 Thompson, Cargill, Political Thought of Martin Luther pp. 129–30; Bornkamm, Luther in mid-career pp. 478–9.Google Scholar
17 Anrich, G., ‘Ein Bedacht Bucers über die Einrichtung von “Christlichen Gemeinschaften”’ in Festschrift für Hans von Schubert, ed Scheel, O. (Leipzig 1929) p. 67 and refs; Léonard, E.G., A History of Protestantism (London 1965) I pp. 113–15.Google Scholar
18 Garrisson-Estèbe, J., Protestants du midi 1559-1598 (Toulouse 1980) p. 142 and refs; compare also The First Book of Discipline ed Cameron, J.K. (Edinburgh 1972) pp. 165–73 Google Scholar and refs.
19 Bucer, M., Praelectiones Doctiss. in Epistolam D.P. ad Ephesios (Basel Leipzig 1562) p. 41, trans in Wright, D.F., Common Places of Martin Bucer (Abingdon 1972) p. 211 Google Scholar.
20 Bucer, M., Martin Bucers Deutsche Schriften ed Stupperich, R. (Gütersloh 1981) 17 (hereafter MBDS 17), p. 138; trans by Wright, Common Places p. 90.Google Scholar
21 On Strasbourg and Bucer up to this point see F. Wendel, L’Eglise de Strasbourg, sa constitution et son organisation 1523-1535 (Paris 1942).
22 Bucer, M., In Sacra Quatuor Evangelia, Enarrationes perpetuae, (Geneva 1553) fol 145V; and as cited by Bellardi, , Gescbichte der ‘Christlichen Gemeinschaft’ p. 26.Google Scholar
23 Bellardi, , Gescbichte der ‘Christlichen Gemeinschaft’ p. 20; Courvoisier, J., La Notion d’Eglise chez Bucer (Paris 1933) p. 34; Léonard, , Protestantism I pp. 192–3; Bornert, R., La Réforme protestante du culte à Strasbourg au xvie siècle (1523-1598) (Leiden 1981) p. 414.Google Scholar
24 Bellardi, , Gescbichte der ‘Christlichen Gemeinschaft’ p. 21; Courvoisier, , Notion d’Eglise chez Bucer p. 37; Léonard, , Protestantism I p. 195; see also Diehl, G.W., Martin Butzers Bedeutung für das kirchliche Leben in Hessen, (Halle 1904).Google Scholar
25 Full text in MBDS 17 pp. 156-95; partial edition in Anrich, ‘Ein Bedacht Bucers’; Bellardi, Geschichte der ‘Christlichen Gemeinschaft’ pp. 22 seq; Courvoisier, Notion d’Eglise chez Bucer pp. 34 seq; Bornert, Réforme protestante du culte pp. 415-17; see also M.U. Chrisman, Strasbourg and the Reform (New Haven 1967) pp. 229-30.
26 MBDS 17 pp. 184-8; Anrich, ‘Ein Bedacht Bucers’ pp. 53-6; Bellardi, Geschichte der ‘Christlichen Gemeinschaft’ pp. 24-6.
27 Full text in MBDS 17 pp. 317-40.
28 MBDS 17 pp. 327-8; Bellardi, Geschkhte der ‘Cbristlichen Gemeinschaft’ pp. 139-40.
29 MBDS 17 pp. 332-4, and n 137 for comparisons with the work of Brenz and Osiander; Bellardi, Geschichte der ‘Christlichen Gemeinschaft’ pp. 144 seq.
30 MBDS 17 pp. 335-6; Bellardi, Geschichte der ‘Christlichen Gemeinschaft’ pp. 148 seq.
31 Compare Courvoisier, Notion d’Eglise chez Bucer pp. 25-32.
32 Wendel, F., Calvin trans P. Mairet (London 1963) pp. 57–9.Google Scholar
33 See above, n 23.
34 Calvin, , Institutes III xxiv 8; on this see also Hópfl, H., The Christian Polity of John Calvin (Cambridge 1982).Google Scholar
35 Calvin, Institutes IV xii 1-13.
36 Calvin, Institutes IV xxvii 40-2.
37 Wendel, Calvin pp. 60-1; below, nn 67-8.
38 Calvin, Institutes IV xxvii 44-6.
39 Vogler, B., Vie religieuse en pays rhénan dans la seconde moitié du xvi’ siècle (Lille 1974) pp. 713–17.Google Scholar
40 On this see G. Strauss, Luther’s House of Learning (Baltimore and London 1978) p. 238.
41 Strauss, Luther’s House of Learning pp. 160-1; for other similar remarks by Luther see S.C. Karant-Nunn, ‘Luther’s Pastors: The Reformation in the Ernestine Countryside’, Transactions of the American Philosophical Society NS 69 pt 8 (1979) pp. 53-4.
42 Kittelson, J.M., ‘Successes and Failures in the German Reformation: the report from Strasbourg’, ARG 73 (1982) p. 159.Google Scholar
43 Kittelson, , ‘Successes and Failures’ p. 167; compare Strauss, , Luther’s House of Learning pp. 166–7.Google Scholar
44 Collinson, , Religion of Protestants pp. 199 Google Scholar seq.
45 Courvoisier, , Notion d’Eglise chez Bucer pp. 22–32; Bellardi, , Geschichte der ‘Christlichen Gemeinschaft’ pp. 16–20.Google Scholar
46 See Léonard, Protestantism I pp. 187-8 and references.
47 Bellardi, Geschichte der ‘Christlichen Gemeinschaft’ pp. 27 seq.
48 Ibid. p. 30.
49 MBDS 17 p. 256.
50 The chronology of this episode is somewhat complicated. See Bellardi, Geschichte der ‘Christlichen Gemeinschaft’ pp. 31-61, and Bellardi’s introductions to texts in MBDS 17 pp. 207-11, 245-8, 256-60, 291-4, 311-13, 317-19.
51 Bellardi, Geschichte der ‘Christlichen Gemeinschaft’ pp. 61-79; Léonard, Pro testantism I p. 198; Chrismán, Strasbourg and the Reform pp. 230-2; Bornert, Réforme protestante du culte pp. 415-17.
52 Bornert, Réforme protestante du culte p. 417.
53 For an analysis of the names in the register see Bellardi, Geschichte der ‘Chri stlichen Gemeinschaft pp. 199 seq.
54 Ibid. pp. 196-7.
55 Ibid. pp. 192-3.
56 Ibid. pp. 193-4.
57 Ibid. p. 195.
58 Vogler, B., Le Clergé protestant rhénan au siècle de la Réforme (1555-1619) (Paris 1976) PP. 341–2.Google Scholar
59 Ibid. pp. 339-40.
60 Ibid. p. 342.
61 Vogler, , Vie religieuse pp. 650–7.Google Scholar
62 Ibid. pp. 715, 733.
63 Ibid. pp. 682 seq, 687 seq, 731 seq.
64 Ibid. pp. 690 seq.
65 Ibid. pp. 685, 688, 718 seq, 732, 743.
66 Ibid. p. 712.
67 Garrisson-Estèbe, Protestants du midi p. 142.
68 Ibid. pp. 148-50.
69 Ibid. p. 143.
70 McCrie, T., History of the Progress and Suppression of the Reformation in Italy (Edinburgh 1833) pp. 358–9, 361–8, 393–4; Rosius, P.D. a Porta, Historia Reformationis Ecclesiarum Raeticarum (Chur 1771-7) I pt 2 pp. 274–6.Google Scholar
71 Ninguarda, F, Atti della visita pastorale diocesana. 2 vols, (Como Società Storica Comense 1892-4) I pp. 268–70.Google Scholar
72 Rosius, a Porta, Historia Reformationis I pt 2 pp. 35–7; Bullingers Korrespondenz mit den Graubündern ed Schiess, T., 3 vols (Basel 1904-6)Google Scholar I pp. 238, 237, 286; II pp. 542, 544, 552.
73 Ninguarda, Atti I pp. 285-6, 300, 306, 311, 334.
74 Ibid. I pp. 281 seq, 330 seq, 340 seq.
75 McCrie, Reformation in Italy p. 387.
76 Schiess, Bullingers Korrespondenz II pp. 107, 128-9.
77 Ibid. I p. 221.
78 In my The Reformation of the Heretics (Oxford 1984) pp. 257-60.
79 Lentolo, S., Historia delle grandi e crudeli persecutioni fatti ai tempi nostri… contro il popolo che chiamano valdese, ed Gay, T. (Torre Pèllice 1906) pp. 4 Google Scholar seq.
80 Oxford Bodleian MS Barlow 8 pp. 513-14, 518, 520.
81 Ibid. pp. 580-1.
82 Gay, T., ‘Scipione Lentolo’, Bulletin de la Société d’Histoire Vaudoise 23 (1906) pp. 104–7.Google Scholar
83 Kittelson, , ‘Successes and Failures’ pp. 160, 165–6.Google Scholar