Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T14:25:24.888Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Who Do Voters Blame for Policy Failure? Information and the Partisan Assignment of Blame

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 January 2021

Jeffrey Lyons  and
William P. Jaeger
Jeffrey Lyons*
Affiliation:
University of Colorado at Boulder, Boulder, CO, USA
William P. Jaeger
Affiliation:
University of Colorado at Boulder, Boulder, CO, USA
*
Jeffrey Lyons, Department of Political Science, University of Colorado at Boulder, Campus Box 333, Boulder, CO 80309-033, USA. Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

How do people assign blame in the wake of significant government failures? If the role of the citizenry in a representative democracy is to discipline elected officials for failing to meet collective expectations, then this question is of paramount importance. Much research suggests that the base tendency of citizens is to simply blame the other party—a normatively concerning outcome. However, some argue that information, especially that from expert and nonpartisan sources, may push citizens to overlook their party affiliation and assign blame in a more performance-based fashion. Using an experimental design, we test this possibility, manipulating whether there is unified or divided government, the partisanship of key actors, and the nature of expert information that participants receive during a hypothetical budget crisis at the state level. We find strong evidence that party weighs heavily on individuals' minds when assigning blame, as expected. More importantly, we find that nonpartisan expert information about the situation does not live up to its potential to sway partisans from their priors. Rather, unbiased information appears to be used as a weapon—ignored when it challenges partisan expectations and used to magnify blame of the other party when it conforms with them.

Keywords

electionspolitical behaviorpublic opinionrepresentationgovernorsexecutive politicspublic policy
Type
Research Article
Information
State Politics & Policy Quarterly , Volume 14 , Issue 3 , September 2014 , pp. 321 - 341
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s) 2014

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Atkeson, Lonna R., and Maestas, Cherie D.. 2012. Catastrophic Politics: How Extraordinary Events Redefine Perceptions of Government. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bartels, Larry M. 2002. “Beyond the Running Tally: Partisan Bias in Political Perceptions.” Political Behavior 24(2): 117–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berinsky, Adam J., Huber, Gregory A., and Lenz, Gabriel S.. 2012. “Evaluating Online Labor Markets for Experimental Research: Amazon.com's Mechanical Turk.” Political Analysis 20(3): 351–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blais, Andre, Gidengil, Elisabeth, Fournier, Patrick, Nevitte, Neil, Everitt, Joanna, and Kim, Jiyoon. 2010. “Political Judgments, Perceptions of Facts, and Partisan Effects.” Electoral Studies 29(1): 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, Adam R. 2010. “Are Governors Responsible for the State of the Economy? Partisanship, Blame, and Divided Federalism.” The Journal of Politics 72(3): 605–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bullock, John G. 2009. “Partisan Bias and the Bayesian Ideal in the Study of Public Opinion.” The Journal of Politics 71:1109–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bullock, John G. 2011. “Elite Influence on Public Opinion in an Informed Electorate.” American Political Science Review 105:496–515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, Angus, Converse, Philip E., Miller, Warren E., and Stokes, Donald E.. 1960. The American Voter. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Collins, Linda M., Dziak, John J., and Li, Runzi. 2009. “Design of Experiments with Multiple Independent Variables: A Resource Management Perspective on Complete and Reduced Factorial Designs.” Psychological Methods 14(3): 202–24.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Delli Carpini, Micahel X., and Keeter, Scott. 1996. What Americans Know About Politics and Why It Matters. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Evans, Geoffrey, and Anderson, Robert. 2006. “The Political Conditioning of Economic Perceptions.” The Journal of Politics 68(1): 194–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaines, Brian J., Kuklinski, James H., Quirk, Paul J., Peyton, Buddy, and Verkuilen, Jay. 2007. “Same Facts, Different Interpretations: Partisan Motivation and Opinion on Iraq.” The Journal of Politics 69(4): 957–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gomez, Brad T., and Matthew Wilson, J.. 2003. “Causal Attribution and Economic Voting in American Congressional Elections.” Political Research Quarterly 56:271–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gomez, Brad T., and Matthew Wilson, J.. 2008. “Political Sophistication and Attributions of Blame in the Wake of Hurricane Katrina.” Publius: The Journal of Federalism 38(4): 633–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goren, Paul. 2002. “Character, Weakness, Partisan Bias, and Presidential Evaluation.” American Journal of Political Science 46(3): 627–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grynaviski, Jeffrey D. 2006. “A Bayesian Learning Model with Application to Party Identification.” Journal of Theoretical Politics 18(3): 323–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayes, Danny. 2005. “Candidate Qualities through a Partisan Lens: A Theory of Trait Ownership.” American Journal of Political Science 49(4): 908–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hellwig, Timothy, and Coffey, Eva. 2011. “Public Opinion, Party Messages, and Responsibility for the Financial Crisis in Britain.” Electoral Studies 30(3): 417–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacoby, William G. 1988. “The Impact of Party Identification on Issue Attitudes.” American Journal of Political Science 32(3): 643–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jerit, Jennifer, and Barabas, Jason. 2012. “Partisan Perceptual Bias and the Information Environment.” The Journal of Politics 74(3): 672–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kam, Cindy D. 2005. “Who Toes the Party Line? Cues, Values, and Individual Differences.” Political Behavior 27(2): 163–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, Sung-youn, Taber, Charles S., and Lodge, Milton. 2010. “A Computational Model of the Citizen as Motivated Reasoner: Modeling the Dynamics of the 2000 Presidential Election.” Political Behavior 32(1): 1–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kunda, Ziva. 1990. “The Case for Motivated Reasoning.” Psychological Bulletin 108(3): 480–98.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lebo, Matthew J., and Cassino, Daniel. 2007. “The Aggregated Consequences of Motivated Reasoning and the Dynamics of Partisan Presidential Approval.” Political Psychology 28(6): 719–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lenz, Gabriel S. 2009. “Learning and Opinion Change, Not Priming: Reconsidering the Priming Hypothesis.” American Journal of Political Science 53(4): 821–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malhotra, Neil. 2008. “Partisan Polarization and Blame Attribution in a Federal System: The Case of Hurricane Katrina.” Publius: The Journal of Federalism 38(4): 651–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malhotra, Neil, and Kuo, Alexander G.. 2008. “Attributing Blame: The Public's Response to Hurricane Katrina.” The Journal of Politics 70(1): 120–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nyhan, Brendan, and Reifler, Jason. 2010. “When Corrections Fail: The Persistence of Political Misperceptions.” Political Behavior 32(2): 303–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peffley, Mark, and Williams, John T.. 1985. “Attributing Presidential Responsibility for National Economic Problems.” American Politics Quarterly 13(3): 393–425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rahn, Wendy M. 1993. “The Role of Partisan Stereotypes in Information Processing about Political Candidates.” American Journal of Political Science 37(2): 472–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Redlawsk, David P., Civettini, Andreq J. W., and Emmerson, Karen M.. 2010. “The Affective Tipping Point.” Political Psychology 31(4): 563–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roeder, Phillip W. 1994. Public Opinion and Policy Leadership in the American States. Tuscaloosa: The University of Alabama Press.Google Scholar
Rudolph, Thomas J. 2003a. “Institutional Context and the Assignment of Political Responsibility.” The Journal of Politics 65(1): 190–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rudolph, Thomas J. 2003b. “Who's Responsible for the Economy? The Formation and Consequences of Responsibility Attributions.” American Journal of Political Science 47(4): 698–713.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rudolph, Thomas J. 2006. “Triangulating Political Responsibility: The Motivated Formation of Responsibility Judgments.” Political Psychology 27(1): 99–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stein, Robert M. 1990. “Economic Voting for Governor and U.S. Senator: The Electoral Consequences of Federalism.” The Journal of Politics 52(1): 29–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taber, Charles S., Cann, Damon, and Kucsova, Simona. 2009. “The Motivated Processing of Political Arguments.” Political Behavior 31(2): 137–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taber, Charles S., and Lodge, Milton. 2006. “Motivated Skepticism in the Evaluation of Political Beliefs.” American Journal of Political Science 50(3): 755–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tilley, James, and Hobolt, Sara B.. 2011. “Is Government to Blame? An Experimental Test of How Partisanship Shapes Perceptions of Performance and Responsibility.” The Journal of Politics 73(2): 316–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wells, Chris, Reedy, Justin, Gastil, John, and Lee, Carolyn. 2009. “Information Distortion and Voting Choices: The Origins and Effects of Factual Beliefs in Initiative Elections.” Political Psychology 30(6): 953–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar