Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-05T03:02:15.964Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

U.S. State Legislative Committee Assignments and Encouragement of Party Loyalty: An Exploratory Analysis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 January 2021

Kristin Kanthak
Kristin Kanthak*
Affiliation:
University of Pittsburgh
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Although political parties in U.S. legislatures cannot compel discipline with the threat of expulsion from the legislature, they can encourage greater party loyalty by strategically bestowing benefits upon favored members. This article explores the use of plum committee assignments to encourage legislators' loyalty to their parties. I outline a theory of how party leaders can use committee assignments strategically to encourage more loyal legislative behavior. This occurs when legislative rules meet two criteria: (1) parties and their leaders can determine who serves on committees and (2) committees have real authority over policy outcomes. I test the theory using data from five state legislatures that differ on the relevant set of legislative rules, finding more party loyalty shown by legislators who receive plum committee assignments when rules meet both criteria and no effect when they do not.

Type
Research Article
Information
State Politics & Policy Quarterly , Volume 9 , Issue 3 , Fall 2009 , pp. 284 - 303
Copyright
Copyright © 2009 by the Board of Trustees of the University of Illinois

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adler, E. Scott, and Lapinski, John S.. 1997. “Demand-Side Theory and Congressional Committee Composition.” American Journal of Political Science 41:895–918.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aldrich, John H., and Coleman Battista, James S.. 2002. “Conditional Party Government in the States.” American Journal of Political Science 46:164–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Associated Press. 2001. “Legislator Tries to Revive .08 Bill.” Associated Press. May 23.Google Scholar
Barrilleaux, Charles. 2000. “Party Strength, Party Change, and Policy-Making in the American States.” Party Politics 6:60–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barrilleaux, Charles, Holbrook, Thomas, and Langer, Laura. 2002. “Electoral Competition, Legislative Balance, and American State Welfare Policy.” American Journal of Political Science 46:415–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Battista, James S. Coleman. 2000. Institutional Choice in State Legislatures. Ph.D. dissertation, Duke University.Google Scholar
Carey, John M., and Shugart, Matthew Soberg. 1995. “Incentives to Cultivate a Personal Vote: A Rank Ordering of Electoral Formulas.” Electoral Studies 14:417–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clayton, Chris. 1999. “GOP Votes for Siegrist as Speaker: The Election of the Bluffs Lawmaker Must be Confirmed by the Full Iowa House.” Omaha World-Herald. April 8, 11.Google Scholar
Connecticut General Assembly. 2003. “Connecticut Budget Process.” A report of the Legislative Program Review and Investigations Committee. www.cga.state.ct.us/2003/pridata/Studies/Budget_Final_Report.htm.Google Scholar
Cox, Gary, and McCubbins, Mathew D..1993. Legislative Leviathan: Party Government in the House. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Cox, Gary, and McCubbins, Mathew D.. 2005. Setting the Agenda: Responsible Party Government in the U.S. House of Representatives. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crook, Sara Brandes, and Hibbing, John R.. 1985. “Congressional Reform and Party Discipline: The Effects of Changes in the Seniority System on Party Loyalty in the U.S. House of Representatives.” British Journal of Political Science 15:207–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daly, Matthew, and Keating, Christopher. 1999. “Making Tough Choices in a Vacuum?: Committees Playing Smaller Role at Capitol.” Hartford Courant. May 11, A3.Google Scholar
Erickson, Brenda. 1997. Inside the Legislative Process. Washington, DC: National Conference of State Legislators.Google Scholar
Francis, Wayne L. 1985. “Leadership, Party Caucuses, and Committees in U.S. State Legislatures.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 10:243–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Francis, Wayne L., and Riddlesperger, James W.. 1982. “U.S. State Legislative Committees: Structure, Procedural Efficiency, and Party Control.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 7:452–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freeman, Patricia K. 1995. “A Comparative Analysis of Speaker Career Patterns in U.S. State Legislatures.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 20:365–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaulden, Sid. 1998. “Committee Stalls Rep. Breeland's C-Average Bill.” The Post and Courier (Charleston, S.C.) May 25, B3.Google Scholar
Groseclose, Tim, and Stewart, Charles III. 1998. “The Value of Committee Seats in the House, 1947–91.” American Journal of Political Science 42:453–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, Richard L., and Grofman, Bernard. 1990. “The Committee Assignment Process and the Conditional Nature of Committee Bias.” American Political Science Review 84:1149–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hedlund, Ronald, and Patterson, Samuel. 1992. “The Electoral Antecedents of State Legislative Committee Assignments.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 17:539–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacklin, Michele. “What an Awful Way to Make a Law.” Hartford Courant. June 10, C3.Google Scholar
Jewell, Malcolm E., and Whicker, Marcia Lynn. 1994. Legislative Leadership in the American States. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Kanthak, Kristin. 2002. “Top-Down Divergence: The Effect of Party-Determined Power on Candidate Ideological Placement.” Journal of Theoretical Politics 14:301–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keating, Christopher. 1997. “Lawmakers Rush Bill to Aid Children's Hospital: New Law Would Exempt Facility from Certain Taxes.” The Hartford Courant. January 29, A1.Google Scholar
Kennedy, Peter. 1996. A Guide to Econometrics, 3rd ed. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
King, Gary, Tomz, Michael, and Wittenberg, Jason. 2000. “Making the Most of Statistical Analyses.” American Journal of Political Science 44:347–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krehbiel, Keith. 1991. Information and Legislative Organization. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leighton, Wayne A., and Lopez, Edward J.. 2002. “Committee Assignments and the Cost of Party Loyalty.” Political Research Quarterly 55:59–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maltzman, Forrest. 1995. “Meeting Competing Demands: Committee Performance in the Postreform House.” American Journal of Political Science 39:653–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maltzman, Forrest. 1997. Competing Principals: Committees, Parties, and the Organization of Congress. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manasso, John. 2000. “Murphy's Law.” The Atlanta Constitution. March 17, A1.Google Scholar
Noel, Don. 1993. “New Speaker of the House Puts Process Over Policy.” The Hartford Courant. January 4, B9.Google Scholar
Norris, Pippa. 2004. Electoral Engineering: Voting Rules and Political Behavior. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Overby, L. Marvin, and Kazee, Thomas A.. 2000. “Outlying Committees in the Statehouse: An Examination of the Prevalence of Committee Outliers in State Legislatures.” The Journal of Politics 62:701–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Overby, L. Marvin, Kazee, Thomas A., and Prince, David W.. 2004. “Committee Outliers in State Legislatures.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 29:81–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perkins, Jay. 1996. “Toeing the Line in Louisiana.” State Legislatures. July 1, 24.Google Scholar
Poole, Keith T., and Rosenthal, Howard. 1984. “The Polarization of American Politics.” The Journal of Politics 46:1061–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poole, Keith T., and Rosenthal, Howard. 1991. “Patterns of Congressional Voting.” American Journal of Political Science 35:228–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prince, David W., and Marvin Overby, L.. 2005. “Legislative Organization Theory and Committee Preference Outliers in State Senates.” State Politics and Policy Quarterly 5:68–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roedemeier, Chad. “Murphy Not Talking About the Flag” Associated Press. February 1.Google Scholar
Rosenthal, Alan. 1998. The Decline of Representative Democracy: Process, Participation, and Power in State Legislatures. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schickler, Eric. 2000. “Institutional Change in the House of Representatives, 1867–1998.” American Political Science Review 94:269–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schlesinger, Arthur M. Jr. 2002. A Thousand Days: John F. Kennedy in the White House. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Shepsle, Kenneth A. 1978. The Giant Jigsaw Puzzle: Democratic Committee Assignments in the Modern House. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Smiley, Jim. 1994. “Iowa House Chooses New Team: Generational Shift Ousts GOP Speaker.” Omaha World-Herald. November 19, 13SF.Google Scholar
Squire, Peverill, Hamm, Keith E., Hedlund, Ronald D., and Moncrief, Gary F.. 2004. “Electoral Reforms, Membership Stability, and the Existence of Committee Property Rights in American State Legislatures.” British Journal of Political Science 35:169–81.Google Scholar
Stern, Eric. 1998. “Ron Corbett: Is His New Friendly Demeanor More than Skin-Deep?” Waterloo/Cedar Falls Courier. December 20, A1.Google Scholar
Swindell, Bill. 2000. “Single Senators Can Kill Local Bill.” The Post and Courier (Charleston, S.C.) April 8, A1.Google Scholar
Tomz, Michael, Wittenberg, Jason, and King, Gary. 2003. CLARIFY: Software for Interpreting and Presenting Statistical Results. Version 2.1. Stanford University, University of Wisconsin, and Harvard University. http://gking.harvard.edu/ (January 5, 2003).Google Scholar
Wright, Gerald C., and Schaffner, Brian F.. 2002. “The Influence of Party: Evidence from State Legislatures.” American Journal of Political Science 96:367–79.Google Scholar