Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-30T23:06:38.991Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

U.S. State and Local Public Policies in 2006: A New Database

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 January 2021

Jason Sorens ,
Fait Muedini  and
William P. Ruger
Jason Sorens
Affiliation:
University at Buffalo, SUNY
Fait Muedini
Affiliation:
University at Buffalo, SUNY
William P. Ruger
Affiliation:
Texas State University-San Marcos
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article introduces a new, public database of U.S. state and local public policies, now available at www.statepolicyindex.com. The database covers more than 170 different state or local policies, coded at the state level as of December 31, 2006, in most cases. We use principal components analysis and derive two orthogonal measures of state policy ideology, which we label policy liberalism and policy urbanism. Our policy liberalism measure passes several reliability and validity checks, while policy urbanism is strongly predicted by urbanization rate, percentage of African Americans in the population, and percentage of Christian adherents in the population.

Type
The Practical Researcher
Information
State Politics & Policy Quarterly , Volume 8 , Issue 3 , Fall 2008 , pp. 309 - 326
Copyright
Copyright © 2008 by the Board of Trustees of the University of Illinois

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Berry, William D., Ringquist, Evan J., Fording, Richard C., and Hanson, Russell L.. 1998. “Measuring Citizen and Government Ideology in the American States, 1960–93.” American Journal of Political Science 42:327–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berry, William D., Ringquist, Evan J., Fording, Richard C., and Hanson, Russell L.. 2004. Measuring Citizen and Government Ideology in the United States, ICPSR Publication Related Archive. www.icpsr.umich.edu/pra/index.html (November 30, 2007).Google Scholar
Easton, David. 1966. A Framework for Political Analysis. New York, NY: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Erikson, Robert S., Wright, Gerald C. Jr., and McIver, John P.. 1993. Statehouse Democracy. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gray, Virginia, Lowery, David, Fellowes, Matthew, and McAtee, Andrea. 2004. “Public Opinion, Public Policy, and Organized Interests in the American States.” Political Research Quarterly 57:411–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hill, Kim Quaile, and Hinton-Andersson, Angela. 1995. “Pathways of Representation: A Causal Analysis of Public Opinion-Public Policy Linkages.” American Journal of Political Science 39:924–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hopkins, Anne H., and Weber, Ronald E.. 1976. “Dimensions of Public Policies in the American States.” Polity 8:475–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horn, John L. 1965. “A Rationale and Test for the Number of Factors in Factor Analysis.” Psychometrica 30:179–85.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jackson, Robert A. 1992. “Effects of Public Opinion and Political System Characteristics on State Policy Outputs.” Publius 22:31–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacoby, William G., and Schneider, Saundra K.. 2001. “Variability in State Policy Priorities: An Empirical Analysis.” The Journal of Politics 63:544–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, Martin, Brace, Paul, and Arceneaux, Kevin. 2005. “Public Opinion and Dynamic Representation in the American States: The Case of Environmental Attitudes.” Social Science Quarterly 86:87–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klingman, David, and Lammers, William W.. 1984. “The ‘General Policy Liberalism’ Factor in American State Politics.” American Journal of Political Science 28:598–610.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leip, Dave. 2007. Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Presidential Elections. www.uselectionatlas.org/ (November 30, 2007).Google Scholar
Miller, Edward Alan. 2005. “State Health Policy Making Determinants, Theory, and Methods: A Synthesis.” Social Science and Medicine 61:2639–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Putnam, Robert D. 2000. Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
Sharkansky, Ira, and Hofferbert, Richard I.. 1969. “Dimensions of State Politics, Economics, and Public Policy.” American Political Science Review 63:867–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shipan, Charles R., and Volden, Craig. 2006. “Bottom-Up Federalism: The Diffusion of Antismoking Policies from U.S. Cities to States.” American Journal of Political Science 50:825–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stigler, George J. 1974. “The Optimum Enforcement of Laws.” In Essays in the Economics of Crime and Punishment, eds. Becker, Gary S. and Landes, William M.. New York, NY: NBER; Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Foundation, Tax. 2007. Facts & Figures: How Does Your State Compare? www.taxfoundation.org/files/ffhandbk-20070129.pdf (March 4, 2008).Google Scholar
Walker, Jack L. 1969. “The Diffusion of Innovations among the American States.” American Political Science Review 63:880–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waltman, Jerold, and Pittman, Sarah. 2002. “The Determinants of State Minimum Wage Rates: A Public Approach.” Journal of Labor Research 23:51–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wright, Gerald C. Jr., Erikson, Robert S., and McIver, John P.. 1987. “Public Opinion and Policy Liberalism in the American States.” American Journal of Political Science 31:980–1001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar