Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T08:05:25.596Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Reevaluating the Effects of Redistricting on Electoral Competition, 1972–2012

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 January 2021

Jamie L. Carson ,
Michael H. Crespin  and
Ryan D. Williamson
Jamie L. Carson
Affiliation:
University of Georgia, Athens, GA, USA
Michael H. Crespin
Affiliation:
University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, TX, USA
Ryan D. Williamson*
Affiliation:
University of Georgia, Athens, GA, USA
*
Ryan D. Williamson, University of Georgia, 104 Baldwin Hall, Athens, GA 30602, USA. Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In this note, we revisit the work of Carson and Crespinto examine the effect of different redistricting plans on competitiveness in U.S. House elections. Similar to the previous results, our probit estimates on an expanded dataset that includes redistricting cycles from 1972 to 2012 reveal that commission and court-drawn districts experience more competition on average than those drawn by legislatures. These results provide additional support for the hypothesis that one way to increase the competitiveness of congressional elections is to allow extra-legislative bodies to draw congressional district boundaries.

Keywords

electionspolitical behaviorredistrictinglegislative politics
Type
Research Article
Information
State Politics & Policy Quarterly , Volume 14 , Issue 2 , June 2014 , pp. 165 - 177
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s) 2014

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Altman, Micah, Karin, MacDonald, and McDonald, Michael. 2005. “From Crayons to Computers: The Evolution of Computer Use in Redistricting.” Social Science Computer Review 23:334–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blumenauer, Earl, and Leach, Jim. 2003. “Redistricting, a Bipartisan Sport.” The New York Times, July 8, sec. A.http://www.nytimes.com/2003/07/08/opinion/redistricting-a-bipartisan-sport.htmlGoogle Scholar
Carson, Jamie L., and Crespin, Michael H.. 2004. “The Effect of State Redistricting Methods on Electoral Competition in United States House of Representatives Races.” State Politics & Policy Quarterly 4:455–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Congressional Quarterly. 1973. Congressional Districts in the 1970s. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press.Google Scholar
Congressional Quarterly. 1983. Congressional Districts in the 1980s. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press.Google Scholar
Congressional Quarterly. 1993. Congressional Districts in the 1990s. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press.Google Scholar
Congressional Quarterly. 2003. Congressional Districts in the 2000s. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press.Google Scholar
Cox, Gary W., and Katz, Jonathan N.. 2002. Elbridge Gerry's Salamander: The Electoral Consequences of the Reapportionment Revolution. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferejohn, John. 1977. “On the Decline of Competition in Congressional Elections.” American Political Science Review 71:166–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grainger, Corbett A. 2010. “Redistricting and Polarization: Who Draws the Lines in California?” Journal of Law & Economics 53:545–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hirsch, Same. 2003. “The United States House of Unrepresentatives: What Went Wrong in the Latest Round of Congressional Redistricting.” Election Law Journal 2:179–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacobson, Gary C. 2013. The Politics of Congressional Elections. 8th edition. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Karch, Andrew, McConnaughy, Corrine M., and Theriault, Sean M.. 2007. “The Legislative Politics of Congressional Redistricting Commission Proposals.” American Politics Research 35:808–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindgren, Eric, and Southwell, Priscilla. 2013. “The Effect of Redistricting Commissions on Electoral Competitiveness in U.S. House Elections, 2002-2010.” Journal of Politics and Law 6:13–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayhew, David W. 1974. Congress: The Electoral Connection. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
McCarty, Nolan, Poole, Keith T., and Rosenthal, Howard. 2009. “Does Gerrymandering Cause Polarization?” American Journal of Political Science 53:666–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McKenzie, Mark J. 2012. “The Influence of Partisanship, Ideology, and the Law on Redistricting Decisions in the Federal Courts.” Political Research Quarterly 65:799–813.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meyer, Lawrence. 1971. “Md. Panel Weighs Redistricting Plan.” The Washington Post, February 24. PageC7.Google Scholar
Murphy, Chad, and Yoshinaka, Antoine. 2009. “Are Mapmakers Able to Target and Protect Congressional Incumbents?: The Institutional Dynamics of Electoral Competition.” American Politics Research 37:955–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
“Some Lawmakers Want to Put Politics Aside.” 2013. July 22. http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=204550145(accessed February 24, 2014).Google Scholar
Yoshinaka, Antoine, and Murphy, Chad. 2011. “The Paradox of Redistricting: How Partisan Mapmakers Foster Competition but Disrupt Representation.” Political Research Quarterly 64:435–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar