Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-30T22:23:19.468Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Politics of Torts: Explaining Litigation Rates in the American States

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 January 2021

Jeff Yates ,
Belinda Creel Davis  and
Henry R. Glick
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Debate rages over whether Americans have become enormously litigious, but little research considers why Americans file cases in the first place or adequately considers rates of litigation over time. This article examines tort filings in ten representative states over a 20-year period and analyzes the impact of social, political, policy, and legal system factors that may account for case filings. We find that filing rates vary substantially over time within individual states, which adds to cautions about claims of general litigiousness. Our analysis also demonstrates that social complexity, opportunities for political participation, and social policy are the most important explanations for variations in filing rates. The tendency of Americans to use the courts to resolve disputes is related to the milieu in which they live and how the political system responds to demands for participation and social support.

Type
Research Article
Information
State Politics & Policy Quarterly , Volume 1 , Issue 2 , Summer 2001 , pp. 127 - 143
Copyright
Copyright © 2001 The American Political Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adler, Freda, and Laufer, William S., eds. 1995. The Legacy of Anomie Theory. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
American Bar Association: Market Research Department. Various years. National Lawyer Population By State. Chicago: American Bar Association.Google Scholar
American Hospital Association. Various years. Hospital Statistics. Chicago: American Hospital Association.Google Scholar
Beck, Nathaniel, and Katz, Jonathon. 1995. “What to Do (and Not to Do) with Time-Series Cross-Section Data.” American Political Science Review 89:634–647.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berry, William D., Ringquist, Evan J., Fording, Richard C., and Hanson, Russell L.. 1998. “Measuring Citizen and Government Ideology in the American States, 1960-93.” American Journal of Political Science 42:327–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carroll, Stephen J. 1987. Assessing the Effects of Tort Reform. Santa Monica, CA: Rand.Google Scholar
Council of State Governments. Various years. The Book of the States. Lexington, KY: Council of State Governments.Google Scholar
Daniels, Stephen. 1982. “Civil Litigation in Illinois Trial Courts.” Law & Policy Quarterly 4: 190–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daniels, Stephen. 1984. “Ladders and Bushes: The Problem of Caseloads and Studying Court Activities Over Time.” American Bar Foundation Research Journal Fall: 751–798.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Erikson, Robert S., Wright, Gerald C. Jr., and McIver, John. 1993. Statehouse Democracy. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Galanter, Marc. 1974. “Why the ‘Haves’ Come Out Ahead: Speculation on the Limits of Legal Change.” Law and Society Review 9: 95–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galanter, Marc. 1975. “Afterward: Explaining Litigation.” Law and Society Review 9:347–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galanter, Marc. 1983. “Reading the Landscape of Disputes: What We Know and Don't Know (and Think We Know) About Our Allegedly Contentious and Litigious Society.” UCLA Law Review 31:4–71.Google Scholar
Galanter, Marc. 1986. “The Day After the Litigation Explosion.” Maryland Law Review 46: 3–39.Google Scholar
Galanter, Marc. 1993. “News From Nowhere: The Debased Debate on Civil Justice.” Denver University Law Review 71:77–113.Google Scholar
Galanter, Marc. 1996. “Real World Torts: An Antidote to Anecdote.” Maryland Law Review 55: 1093–1160.Google Scholar
Gastel, Ruth. 2000. I.I.I. Insurance Fact Book 2000. New York: Insurance Information Institute.Google Scholar
Grossman, Joel, and Sarat, Austin. 1975. “Litigation in the Federal Courts: A Comparative Perspective.” Law and Society Review 9:321–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grossman, Joel, Sarat, Austin, Kritzer, Herbert, McDougal, Stephen, Bumiller, Kristin, and Miller, Richard. 1982. “Dimensions of Institutional Participation: Who Uses the Courts, and How?” Journal of Politics 44:86–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harrington, Christine, and Ward, Daniel. 1995. “Patterns of Appellate Litigation, 1945-1990.” In Contemplating Courts, Epstein, Lee, ed. Washington, DC: CQ Press.Google Scholar
Holbrook, Thomas M., and Dunk, Emily Van. 1993. “Electoral Competition in the American States.” American Political Science Review 87:955–962.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hsaio, C. 1986. Analysis of Panel Data. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kennedy, Peter. 1998. A Guide To Econometrics. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishers.Google Scholar
Key, V.O. 1949. Southern Politics in State and Nation. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Langer, Laura. 1999. “Measuring Income Distribution Across Space and Time in the American States.” Social Science Quarterly 80:55–67.Google Scholar
Lester, James P., and Stewart, Joseph Jr. 2000. Public Policy. 2nd ed. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.Google Scholar
Marvell, Thomas B. 1994. “Tort Caseload Trends and the Impact of Tort Reforms.” Justice System Journal 17: 193–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McIntosh, Wayne V. 1980-81. “One Hundred Fifty Years of Dispute Settlement: A Court Tale.” Law and Society Review 15: 823–848.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McIntosh, Wayne V. 1983. “Private Use of a Public Forum: A Long Range View of the Dispute Processing Role of Courts.” American Political Science Review 77:991–1010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McIntosh, Wayne V. 1990. The Appeal of Civil Law. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Merton, Robert K. 1968. Social Theory and Social Structure. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Miller, Richard E., and Sarat, Austin. 1981. “Grievances, Claims and Disputes: Assessing the Adversary Culture.” Law and Society Review 15: 525–566.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
National Center for State Courts. 1976-95. State Court Caseload Statistics: Annual Report. Williamsburg, VA: National Center for State Courts.Google Scholar
National Center for State Courts. 1995. Tort Filings in 16 States, 1975-95. Williamsburg, VA: National Center for State Courts.Google Scholar
National Center for State Courts. 1995. Tort Caseloads in State Trial Courts of General Jurisdiction 1987-95. Williamsburg, VA: National Center for State Courts.Google Scholar
Pfennigstorf, Werner, and Gifford, Donald G.. 1991. A Comparative Study of Liability Law and Compensation Schemes in Ten Countries and the United States. Oak Brook, IL: Insurance Research Council.Google Scholar
Roper, Robert T. 1986. “The Propensity to Litigate in State Trial Courts, 1981-1984, 1984-1985.” Justice System Journal 11: 5–15.Google Scholar
Sayrs, Lois. 1989. Pooled Time Series Analysis. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmidt, Joan, Browne, Mark, and Lee, Han Duck. 1997. “The Effects of State Tort Reforms on Claim Filings.” Risk Management and Insurance Review 1:1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Mark A. 1997. “The Nature of Party Governance: Connecting Conceptualization and Measurement.” American Journal of Political Science 41:1042–1056.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stimson, James. 1985. “Regression in Time and Space: A Statistical Essay.” American Journal of Political Science 29:914–947.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stookey, John A. 1986. “Economic Cycles and Civil Litigation.” Justice System Journal 11: 282–302.Google Scholar
United States Department of Commerce: Bureau of the Census. Various years. Statistical Abstract of the United States. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
United States House of Representatives: Committee on Ways and Means. Various years. The Green Book. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
Void, George B., and Bernard, Thomas J.. 1986. Theoretical Criminology. 3rd ed. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
White, Halbert. 1978. “A Heteroskedasticity-consistent Covariance Matrix and a Direct Test for Heteroskedasticity.” Econometrica 48:817–838.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wollschläger, Christian. 1998. “Exploring Global Landscapes of Litigation Rates.” In Sociologie des Rechts: Festschrift für Erhard Blankenburg zum 60. Geburtstag. Brand, Jürgen and Strempel, Dieter, eds. Baden-Baden, Germany: Nomos.Google Scholar
Zemans, Frances Kahn. 1983. “Legal Mobilization: The Neglected Role of the Law in the Political System.” American Political Science Review 77:690–703.CrossRefGoogle Scholar