Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-30T21:38:40.961Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Misreport of Vote Choice in U.S. Senate and Gubernatorial Elections

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 January 2021

Thomas M. Carsey  and
Robert A. Jackson
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Previous research has found strong evidence of a pro-winner vote misreport bias in the National Election Studies (NES). We extend this research by examining the reported vote for U.S. senator and governor in the 1990, 1992, and 1994 NES and in the 1990 and 1992 Senate Election Studies (SES). We find continuing evidence of a pro-winner misreport problem. In contrast, we uncover no significant pro-winner bias in state exit polls conducted by the media. We test two commonly asserted explanations of the source of this misreport bias, but find no evidence that the problem is related either to the number of days between the election and the survey interview or to incumbency. Finally, we test a model of the misreport process that suggests that less politically engaged and less politically sophisticated voters are most likely to over-report support for the winner. Our results here are mixed; we find some evidence that Independents are more likely to misreport in favor of the winner, but we find no evidence that education level affects the likelihood of misreporting.

Type
Research Article
Information
State Politics & Policy Quarterly , Volume 1 , Issue 2 , Summer 2001 , pp. 196 - 209
Copyright
Copyright © 2001 The American Political Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Atkeson, Lonna Rae. 1999. “‘SURE, I VOTED FOR THE WINNER!‘ Over-report of the Primary Vote for the Party Nominee in the National Election Studies.” Political Behavior 21:197–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Belli, Robert F., Traugott, Michael W., Young, Margaret, and McGonagle, Katherine A.. 1999. “Reducing Vote Over-reporting in Surveys.” Public Opinion Quarterly 63:90–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bishop, George F., and Fisher, Bonnie S.. 1995. “‘Secret Ballots’ and Self-Reports in an Exit-Poll Experiment.” Public Opinion Quarterly 59:568–588.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Box-Steffensmeier, Janet M., Jacobson, Gary C., and Tobin Grant, J..“Question Wording and the House Vote Choice: Some Experimental Evidence.” Public Opinion Quarterly In press.Google Scholar
Carsey, Thomas M., and Wright, Gerald C.. 1998. “State and National Factors in Gubernatorial and Senatorial Elections.” American Journal of Political Science 42:994–1002, 1008-11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Delli Carpini, Michael X., and Keeter, Scott. 1993. “Measuring Political Knowledge: Putting First Things First.” American Journal of Political Science 37:1179–1206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Delli Carpini, Michael X., and Keeter, Scott. 1996. What Americans Know About Politics and Why It Matters. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Eubank, Robert B., and Gow, David John. 1983. “The Pro-Incumbent Bias in the 1978 and 1980 National Election Studies.” American Journal of Political Science 27:122–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eubank, Robert B. 1985. “Incumbent Effects on Individual-Level Voting Behavior in Congressional Elections: A Decade of Exaggeration.” Journal of Politics 47:958–967.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gow, David John, and Eubank, Robert B.. 1984. “The Pro-Incumbent Bias in the 1982 National Election Study.” American Journal of Political Science 28:224–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gronke, Paul. 1992. “Over-reporting the Vote in the 1988 Senate Election Study: A Response to Wright.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 17:113–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hershey, Marjorie Randon. 1992. “The Constructed Explanation: Interpreting Election Results in the1984 Presidential Race.” Journal of Politics 54:943–976.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacobson, Gary C., and Rivers, Douglas. 1993. “Explaining the Over-report of Votes for Incumbents in National Election Studies.” Paper delivered at the annual meeting of the Western Political Science Association, Pasadena, CA.Google Scholar
King, Gary, Keohane, Robert O., and Verba, Sidney. 1994. Designing Social Inquiry. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levy, Mark R. 1983. “The Methodology and Performance of Election Day Polls.” Public Opinion Quarterly 47:54–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lodge, Milton, McGraw, Kathleen M., and Stroh, Patrick. 1989. “An Impression-driven Model of Candidate Evaluation.” American Political Science Review 83:399–419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luskin, Robert C. 1987. “Measuring Political Sophistication.” American Journal of Political Science 31:856–899.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mattei, Franco. 1998. “Winning at the Polls and in the Polls: The Incumbency Advantage in Surveys of U.S. House Voters.” Electoral Studies 17:443–461.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGraw, Kathleen M., Lodge, Milton, and Stroh, Patrick. 1990. “On-line Processing in Candidate Evaluation: The Effects of Issue Order, Issue Importance, and Sophistication.” Political Behavior 12:41–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, Warren E., Kinder, Donald R., Rosenstone, Steven J., and the National Election Studies. 1999. NATIONAL ELECTION STUDIES [dataset]. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan, Center for Political Studies.Google Scholar
Miller, Warren E., and Merrill Shanks, J.. 1996. The New American Voter. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Mitofsky, Warren J., and Brennan, John. 1993. “Problems in Exit Polling: Interviews with Warren J. Mitofsky and John Brennan.” The Public Perspective 4 (January/February): 19–23.Google Scholar
Wright, Gerald C. 1990. “Misreports of Vote Choice in the 1988 NES Senate Election Study.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 15:543–564.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wright, Gerald C. 1992. “Reported versus Actual Vote: There Is a Difference and It Matters.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 17: 131–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wright, Gerald C. 1993. “Errors in Measuring Vote Choice in the National Election Studies, 1952-88.” American Journal of Political Science 37:291–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zaller, John. 1990. “Political Awareness, Elite Opinion Leadership, and the Mass Survey Response.” Social Cognition 8:125–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zaller, John. 1992. The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar