Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T20:37:34.767Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Measuring the Stringency of State Campaign Finance Regulation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 January 2021

Christopher Witko*
Affiliation:
California State University, Sacramento

Abstract

Scholars are beginning to consider how state campaign finance regulation influences political behavior and elections, but they lack the systematic measure of these regulations needed to do so. This article describes a simple measure of state campaign finance regulation stringency that is based on state statutes in 2002. Further, this article explains the construction of the measure and assesses its validity and reliability. The index generally confirms qualitative assessments of state campaign finance regulation, and it is correlated with measures of related aspects of state campaign finance regulation, campaign spending, and fundraising.

Type
The Practical Researcher
Copyright
Copyright © 2005 by the Board of Trustees of the University of Illinois

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Babson, Jennifer. 1998. “Ballot Questions Prevail with Solid ‘Yes’ Votes,” The Boston Globe, 4 November, B.Google Scholar
Buckley v. Valeo. 1976. 424 U.S. 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fischer, Howard. 1998. “Public Funding Law May Revolutionize Arizona Elections,” The Arizona Daily Star, 5 November, A.Google Scholar
Gierzynski, Anthony. 1998. “A Framework for the Study of Campaign Finance.” In Campaign Finance in State Legislative Elections, eds. Thompson, Joel A. and Moncrief, Gary F.. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press.Google Scholar
Gierzynski, Anthony. 2000. Money Rules: Financing Elections in America. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Gierzynski, Anthony. 2002. “Financing Gubernatorial and State Legislative Elections.” In Financing the 2000 Election, ed. Magleby, David. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
Goldberg, Carey. 2000. “Publicly Paid Elections Put to Test in 3 States,” The New York Times, 19 November, 1.Google Scholar
Gross, Donald A., and Goidel, Robert K.. 2003. The States of Campaign Finance Reform. Columbus, OH: Ohio State University Press.Google Scholar
Hamm, Keith E., and Hogan, Robert E.. 2003. “The Impact of Campaign Finance Laws: First Order Effects?” Presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Philadelphia, PA.Google Scholar
Jensen, Jennifer M., and Beyle, Thad. 2003. “Of Footnotes, Missing Data, and Lessons for 50-State Data Collection: The Gubernatorial Campaign Finance Project, 1977-2001.” State Politics and Policy Quarterly 3:203–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuttner, Robert. 1998. “When Reform Backfires,” The Boston Globe, 29 November, D.Google Scholar
Lewis, Raphael. 2003. “Romney Faults Clean Elections,” The Boston Globe, 26 June, B.Google Scholar
Malbin, Michael J., and Gais, Thomas L.. 1998. The Day after Reform: Sobering Lessons from the American States. Albany, NY: The Rockefeller Institute Press.Google Scholar
Newmark, Adam J. 2005. “Measuring Legislative Lobbying Regulation, 1990-2003.” State Politics and Policy Quarterly 5:182–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nunnally, Jum. 1967. Psychometric Theory. San Francisco, CA: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Opheim, Cynthia. 1991. “Explaining the Differences in State Lobby Regulation.” Western Political Quarterly 44:405–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pippen, John, Bowler, Shaun, and Donovan, Todd. 2002. “Election Reform and Direct Democracy: Campaign Finance Reform Regulation in the American States.” American Politics Research 30:559–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramsden, Graham P. 2002. “State Legislative Campaign Finance Research: A Review Essay.” State Politics and Policy Quarterly 2:176–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richardson, Natalie. 2004. “Arizona Voters Eye Campaign Issue; Foes of Public Funding Seek to Overturn Clean Elections Act,” The Washington Times, 29 June, A.Google Scholar