Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-30T23:37:43.703Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Measuring Gubernatorial Ideology: A Content Analysis of State of the State Speeches

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 January 2021

Daniel Coffey
Daniel Coffey*
Affiliation:
The College of William and Mary
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

I use computer-assisted content analysis of gubernatorial state of the state addresses in 2000 and 2001 to measure state governors' ideology. These speeches provide an excellent direct measure of governors' preferences, values, and ideology. This method produced reliable and valid indicators of the ideology of state governors. The ideological content of these speeches clearly distinguishes governors on the basis of their party affiliation. Researchers should consider the content analysis of speeches and other public pronouncements as a useful way of assessing the views of governors and other public officials and incorporating them into models of state policy and politics.

Type
The Practical Researcher
Information
State Politics & Policy Quarterly , Volume 5 , Issue 1 , Spring 2005 , pp. 88 - 103
Copyright
Copyright © The American Political Science Association, 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Atkeson, Lonna Rae, and Partin, Randall W.. 1995. “Economic and Referendum Voting: A Comparison of Gubernatorial and Senatorial Elections.” American Political Science Review 89:99–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berry, Frances Stokes, and Berry, William D.. 1992. “Tax Innovation in the States: Capitalizing on Political Opportunity.” American Journal of Political Science 36:715–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berry, William D., Ringquist, Evan J., Fording, Richard C., and Hanson, Russell L.. 1998. “Measuring Citizen and Government Ideology in the American States, 1960-1993.” American Journal of Political Science 42:327–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beyle, Thad. 1999. “The Governors.” In Politics in the American States: A Comparative Analysis, eds. Gray, Virginia, Hanson, Russell L., and Jacob, Herbert. 7th ed. Washington, DC: CQ Press.Google Scholar
Brown, Robert D. 1995. “Party Cleavages and Welfare Effort in the American States.” American Political Science Review 89:23–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, Robert D., Jackson, Robert A., and Wright, Gerald C.. 1999. “Registration, Turnout, and State Party Systems.” Political Research Quarterly 52:463–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bowling, Cynthia J., and Ferguson, Margaret R.. 2001. “Divided Government, Interest Representation, and Policy Differences: Competing Explanations of Gridlock in the Fifty States.” Journal of Politics 63:182–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Canes-Wrone, Brandice. 2001. “The President's Legislative Influence from Public Appeals.” American Journal of Political Science 45:313–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, Jeffrey E. 1995. “Presidential Rhetoric and the Public Agenda.” American Journal of Political Science 39:87–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crew, Robert E. 1992. “Understanding Gubernatorial Behavior: A Framework for Analysis.” In Governors and Hard Times, ed. Beyle, Thad. Washington, DC: CQ Press.Google Scholar
DiLeo, Daniel. 2001. “To Develop or to Redistribute? An Analysis of the Content of Governors' Agendas.” State and Local Government Review 33:52–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elazar, Daniel J. 1972. American Federalism: A View from the States. 2nd ed. New York: Crowell.Google Scholar
Erikson, Robert S., Wright, Gerald C., and McIver, John P.. 1993. Statehouse Democracy: Public Opinion and Policy in the American States. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ferguson, Margaret R. 2003. “Chief Executive Success in the Legislative Arena.” State Politics and Policy Quarterly 3:158–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grogan, Colleen M. 1994. “Political-Economic Factors Influencing State Medicaid Policy.” Political Research Quarterly 47:589–623.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herzik, Eric. 1991. “Policy Agendas and Gubernatorial Leadership.” In Gubernatorial Leadership and State Policy, eds. Herzik, Eric B. and Brown, Brent W.. NewYork: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
Hill, Kim Quaile, and Leighley, Jan E.. 1993. “Party Ideology, Organization, and Competitiveness as Mobilizing Forces in Gubernatorial Elections.” American Journal of Political Science 37:1158–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hill, Kim Quaile, Hanna, Stephen, and Shafqat, Sahar. 1997. “The Liberal-Conservative Ideology of U.S. Senators: A New Measure.” American Journal of Political Science 41:1395–413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, John E., and Kingdon, John W.. 1992. “Ideology, Interest Group Scores, and Legislative Votes.” American Journal of Political Science 36:805–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laver, Michael, and Garry, John. 2000. “Estimating Policy Positions from Political Texts.” American Journal of Political Science 44:619–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laver, Michael, Benoit, Kenneth, and Garry, John. 2003. “Extracting Policy Positions from Political Texts Using Words as Data.” American Political Science Review 97:311–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Light, Paul. 1991. The President's Agenda: Domestic Policy Choice from Kennedy to Carter. 2nd ed. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Morehouse, Sarah M. 1998. The Governor as Party Leader: Campaigning and Governing. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poole, Keith T., and Rosenthal, Howard. 1997. Congress: A Political-Economic History of Roll-Call Voting. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Rosenthal, Alan. 1990. Governors and Legislators: Contending Powers. Washington, DC: CQ Press.Google Scholar
Segal, Jeffrey A., and Cover, Albert D.. 1989. “Ideological Values and the Votes of U.S. Supreme Court Justices.” American Political Science Review 83:557–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Soss, Joe, Schram, Sanford F., Vartanian, Thomas P., and O'Brien, Erin. 2001. “Setting the Terms of Relief: Explaining State Policy Choices in the Devolution Revolution.” American Journal of Political Science 45:378–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Squire, Peverill, and Fastnow, Christina. 1994. “Comparing Gubernatorial and Senatorial Elections.” Political Research Quarterly 47:705–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, John Clayton. 1975. The Decline of Ideology in Western Political Parties: A Study of Changing Policy Orientations. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Van Assendelft, Laura A. 1997. Governors, Agenda Setting, and Divided Government. Lanham, MD: University Press of America.Google Scholar
Weber, Robert P. 1990. Basic Content Analysis. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
West, Mark D., ed. 2001. Theory, Method and Practice in Computer Content Analysis. Westport, CT: Ablex Publishing.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Coffey supplementary material

Gov_Ideology_Table_Contents

Download Coffey supplementary material(File)
File 46.7 KB