Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-29T07:59:09.600Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Mayflies and Old Bulls: Organization Persistence in State Interest Communities

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 January 2021

Jennifer Anderson ,
Adam Newmark ,
Virginia Gray  and
David Lowery
Jennifer Anderson
Affiliation:
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Adam Newmark
Affiliation:
Wake Forest University
Virginia Gray
Affiliation:
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
David Lowery
Affiliation:
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Many conventional accounts of lobbying communities emphasize towering differences in political influence between for-profit and not-for-profit and public organizations and between institutions and membership groups or associations. A central cause of these differences in influence is said to be differences in the persistence of these types of groups in a lobbying system. We test this hypothesis by examining the short-term turnover of organized interests in state interest communities in the 1990s. While we find evidence of substantial year-to-year turnover in lobby registrations, we find little support for the conventional wisdom about the distribution of persistence among types of organizations. Contrary to expectations, institutions are markedly less persistent than membership groups and associations, and for-profit interests are no more persistent, on average, than not-for-profit interests.

Type
Research Article
Information
State Politics & Policy Quarterly , Volume 4 , Issue 2 , Summer 2004 , pp. 140 - 160
Copyright
Copyright © Board of Trustees of the University of Illinois

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anderson, Jennifer, Matthew Fellowes, Virginia Gray, and David Lowery. 2003. “Legislative Agendas and Interest Advocacy: Understanding the Demand-Side of Lobbying.” Presented at the 3rd Annual Conference on State Politics and Policy, Tucson, AZ.Google Scholar
Baumgartner, Frank R., and Leech, Beth L.. 2001. “Interest Niches and Policy Bandwagons: Patterns of Interest Group Involvement in National Politics.” Journal of Politics 63:1191–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berry, Jeffrey M. 1999. The New Liberalism. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
Carroll, Glenn R., and Hannan, Michael T.. 2000. The Demography of Corporations and Industries. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Denzau, Arthur T., and Munger, Michael C.. 1986. “Legislators and Interest Groups: How Unorganized Interests Get Represented.” American Political Science Review 80: 89–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drew, Elizabeth. 1999. The Corruption of American Politics. Woodstock, NY: Overlook.Google Scholar
Gerber, Elisabeth R. 1999. The Populist Paradox: Interest Group Influence and the Promise of Direct Legislation. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Gray, Virginia, and Lowery, David. 1995. “The Demography of Interest Organization Communities: Institutions, Associations, and Membership Groups.” American Politics Quarterly 23: 3–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gray, Virginia, and Lowery, David. 1996. The Population Ecology of Interest Representation: Lobbying Communities in the American States. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gray, Virginia, and Lowery, David. 1997. “Life in a Niche: Mortality Anxiety among Organized Interests in the American States.” Political Research Quarterly 50: 25–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gray, Virginia, and Lowery, David. 1998. “State Lobbying Regulations and Their Enforcement: Implications for the Diversity of State Interest Communities.” State and Local Government Review 30: 78–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gray, Virginia, and Lowery, David. 2001a. “The Expression of Density Dependence in State Communities of Organized Interests.” American Politics Research 29: 374–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gray, Virginia, and Lowery, David. 2001b. “The Institutionalization of State Communities of Organized Interests.” Political Research Quarterly 54: 265–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hannan, Michael T., and Carroll, Glenn R.. 1992. Dynamics of Organizational Populations. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hannan, Michael T., and Freeman, John. 1989. Organizational Ecology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Hart, David M. 2002. “High-Tech Learns to Play the Washington Game, or the Political Education of Bill Gates and Other Nerds.” In Interest Group Politics, eds. Cigler, Allan J. and Loomis, Burdett. 6th ed. Washington, DC: CQ Press.Google Scholar
Heinz, John P., Laumann, Richard O., Nelson, Robert L., and Salisbury, Robert. 1993. The Hollow Core. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Leech, Beth L., Baumgartner, Frank R., Pira, Timothy La, and Semanko, Nicholas A.. 2002. “Drawing Lobbyists to Washington: Government Activity and the Demand for Advocacy.” Presented at the Annual Meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago.Google Scholar
Lowery, David, and Gray, Virginia. 1994. “Do Lobbying Regulations Influence Lobbying Registrations.” Social Science Quarterly 75: 382–4.Google Scholar
Lowery, David, and Gray, Virginia. 1997. “How Some Rules Just Don't Matter: The Regulation of Lobbyists.” Public Choice 91: 139–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lowery, David, and Gray, Virginia. 1998. “The Dominance of Institutions in Interest Representation: A Test of Seven Explanations.” American Journal of Political Science 42:231–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lowery, David, Gray, Virginia, and Fellowes, Matthew. 2002. “Sisyphus Meets the Borg: Economic Scale and the Inequalities in Interest Representation.” Presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Boston, MA.Google Scholar
Lowery, David, Gray, Virginia, Fellowes, Matthew, and Anderson, Jennifer. 2003. “Living in the Moment: Lags, Leads, and the Link between Legislative Agendas and Interest Advocacy.” Presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Philadelphia, PA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGuire, Kevin T. 1993. The Supreme Court Bar. Charlottesville, VA: University Press of Virginia.Google Scholar
Newmark, Adam J. 2003. “Personal Relationships and Information Provision in State Lobbying: The Nature of Relationships and the Factors Affecting Them.” Ph.D. diss. University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.Google Scholar
Nownes, Anthony. N.d. “The Population Ecology of Interest Group Formation.” British Journal of Political Science. Forthcoming.Google Scholar
Olson, Mancur Jr. 1965. The Logic of Collective Action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Olson, Mancur Jr. 1982. The Rise and Decline of Nations. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Rosenthal, Alan. 2001. The Third House. Washington, DC: CQ Press.Google Scholar
Salisbury, Robert. 1984. “Interest Representation: The Dominance of Institutions.” American Political Science Review 81: 64–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schattschneider, E.E. 1960. The Semisovereign People. New York: Halt, Rinehart, and Winston.Google Scholar
Schlozman, Kay Lehman, and Tierney, John T.. 1986. Organized Interests and American Democracy. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Smith, Mark A. 2000. American Business and Political Power. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, Clive, and Hrebenar, Ronald J.. 2004. “Interest Groups in the States.” In Politics in the American States, eds. Gray, Virginia and Hanson, Russell L.. 8th ed. Washington, DC: CQ Press.Google Scholar
Walker, Jack L. Jr. 1991. Mobilizing Interest Groups in America. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zeigler, Harmon, and Baer, Michael. 1969. Lobbying: Interaction and Influence in American State Legislatures. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing Company.Google Scholar