Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-30T22:48:26.108Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Local Politics and International Agreement: The Case of Government Procurement in the U.S. States

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 January 2021

Dong-Hun Kim
Dong-Hun Kim*
Affiliation:
Oakland University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article examines the responses of sub-national governments to international agreements that severely reduce their policy discretion. I focus on their decision to subject public procurement to international competition by joining the Agreement of Government Procurement (GPA) of the World Trade Organization. In a public procurement market, a government becomes both a market participant and a market regulator. I argue that the propensity of governments to join the GPA, thus reducing their discretion as market regulators, depends on the degree of local political competition. Studying state governments in the United States, I find that the degree of political competition positively affects not only the propensity to join the GPA but also the amount of procurement that a government subjects to international competition.

Type
Research Article
Information
State Politics & Policy Quarterly , Volume 9 , Issue 1 , Spring 2009 , pp. 79 - 101
Copyright
Copyright © 2009 by the Board of Trustees of the University of Illinois

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alt, James E., and Lassen, David Dreyer. 2003. “The Political Economy of Institutions and Corruption in American States.” Journal of Theoretical Politics 15:341–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alt, James E., and Lassen, David Dreyer. 2006. “Transparency, Political Polarization, and Political Budget Cycles in OECD Countries.” American Journal of Political Science 50:530–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alt, James E., Lassen, David Dreyer, and Skilling, David. 2002. “Fiscal Transparency, Gubernatorial Popularity, and the Scale of Government: Evidence from the States.” State Politics and Policy Quarterly 2:230–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alt, James E., Lassen, David Dreyer, and Rose, Shanna. 2006. “The Causes of Fiscal Transparency: Evidence from the U.S. States.” IMF Staff Papers 53:30–57.Google Scholar
Ansolabehere, Stephen, and Snyder, James M. Jr. 2002. “The Incumbency Advantage in U.S. Elections: An Analysis of State and Federal Offices, 1942–2000.” Election Law Journal 1:315–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arrowsmith, Sue. 1998. Towards an Agreement on Transparency in Government Procurement. Geneva, SWI: Program for the Study of International Organizations (PSIO).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arrowsmith, Sue. 2003. Government Procurement in the WTO. London, UK: Kluwer Law International.Google Scholar
Besley, Timothy. 2006. Principled Agents? The Political Economy of Good Government. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Besley, Timothy, and Case, Anne. 1995. “Does Electoral Accountability Affect Economic Policy Choices? Evidence from Gubernatorial Term Limits.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 110:769–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Besley, Timothy, Persson, Torsten, and Sturm, Daniel. 2005. “Political Competition and Economic Performance: Theory and Evidence from the United States.” NBER Working Paper No. 11484.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bibby, John F., and Holbrook, Thomas M.. 1999. “Parties and Elections.” In Politics in The American States: A Comparative Analysis, eds. Gray, Virginia, Hanson, Russell L., and Jacob, Herbert. 7th ed. Washington, DC: CQ Press.Google Scholar
Bowler, Shaun, and Donovan, Todd. 2004. “Evolution in State Governance Structures: Unintended Consequences of State Tax and Expenditure Limitations.” Political Research Quarterly 57:189–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bodenhorn, Howard. 2003. State Banking in Early America: A New Economic History. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Buchanan, James M., and Wagner, Richard E.. 1977. Democracy in Deficit. New York, NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Carey, John, Niemi, Richard G., and Powell, Lynda W.. 2000. Term Limits in the State Legislatures. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Choi, Inbom. 2003. “The Long and Winding Road to the Government Procurement Agreement: Korea's Accession Experience.” In Option for Global Trade Reform: A View from the Asia-Pacific, eds. Martin, Will and Pangestu, Mari. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Colgan, Charles S. 1995. “Brave New World: International Regulation of Subsidies and the Future of State and Local Economic Development Programs.” Economic Development Quarterly 9:107–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooper, Kenneth J. 1993. “To Compel or Encourage: Seeking Compliance with International Trade Agreements at the State Level.” Minnesota Journal of Global Trade 2:143–70.Google Scholar
Deardorff, Alan V., and Stern, Robert M.. 1998. Measurement of Nontariff Barriers. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deltas, George, and Evenett, Simon J.. 1997. “Quantitative Estimate of the Effects of Preference Policies.” In Law and Policy in Public Purchasing: The WTO Agreement on Government Procurement, eds. Hoekman, Bernard M. and Mavroidis, Petros C.. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Elliott, Kimberly Ann. 1997. “Corruption as an International Policy Problem.” In Corruption and the Global Economy, ed. Elliott, Kimberly Ann. Washington, DC: Institute for International Economics.Google Scholar
Commission, European. 2004. A Report on the Functioning of Public Procurement Markets in the EU: Benefits from the Application of EU Directives and Challenges for the Future. Luxemburg.Google Scholar
Fahim-Nader, Mahnaz, and Zeile, William J.. 1996. “Foreign Direct Investment in the United States.” Survey of Current Business 76:102–30.Google Scholar
Glickman, Mark, and Painter, Gary D.. 2004. “Do Tax and Expenditure Limits Lead to State Lotteries? Evidence from the United States: 1970–1989.” Public Finance Review 32:36–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grindle, Merilee S. 2007. Going Local: Decentralization, Democratization, and the Promise of Good Governance. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Gray, Virginia, Hanson, Russell L., and Jacob, Herbert. 1999. Politics in the American States: A Comparative Analysis. 7th ed. Washington, DC: CQ Press.Google Scholar
Guay, Terrence. 2000. “Local Government and Global Politics: The Implications of Massachusetts' Burma Law.” Political Science Quarterly 115:353–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heckman, James. 1979. “Sample Selection Bias as Specification Error.” Econometrica 47:153–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hirsh, Barry T., Macpherson, David A., and Vroman, Wayne G.. 2001. “Estimated of Union Density by State.” Monthly Labor Review July: 51–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoekman, Bernard M., and Mavroidis, Petros C.. 1997. “Multilateralizing the Agreement on Government Procurement Policies.” In Law and Policy in Public Purchasing, eds. Hoekman, Bernard M. and Mavroidis, Petros C.. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Holbrook, Thomas M., and Dunk, Emily Van. 1993. “Electoral Competition in the American States.” American Political Science Review 87:955–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huber, John D., and Shipan, Charles R.. 2002. Deliberate Discretion? The Institutional Foundations of Bureaucratic Autonomy. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laffont, Jean-Jacques, and Tirole, Jean. 1993. A Theory of Incentives in Procurement and Regulation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Maxwell, Amanda E., and Winters, Richard. 2004. “A Quarter-Century of (data on) Corruption in the American States.” Paper presented at the 2004 Annual Meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association.Google Scholar
McIver, John P., Erikson, Robert S., and Wright, Gerald C.. 2001. “Public Opinion and Public Policy in Temporal Perspective: A View from the States.” Paper presented at the 2001 Annual Meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association.Google Scholar
Meier, Kenneth, and Holbrook, Thomas. 1992. “I Seen My Opportunities and I Took 'Em: Political Corruption in the United States.” The Journal of Politics 54:135–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moe, Terry M. 1989. “The Politics of Bureaucratic Structure.” In Can the Government Govern? eds. Chubb, John and Peterson, Paul. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
Moe, Terry M. 1990. “The Politics of Structural Choice: Toward a Theory of Public Bureaucracy.” In Organization Theory: From Chester Barnard to the Present and Beyond, ed. Williamson, Oliver E.. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mullins, Daniel, and Joyce, Phillip. 1996. “Tax and Expenditure Limitations and State and Local Fiscal Structure: An Empirical Assessment.” Public Budgeting and Finance 16:75–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Naftzger, David. 2000. “A New Era for the World Trade Organization.” National Conference of State Legislatures (NCSL) LegisBrief. Washington, DC: NCSL. www.ncsl.org.Google Scholar
National Association of State Procurement Officials (NASPO). 2001. State and Local Government Purchasing: Principles and Practices. Lexington, KY: NASPO.Google Scholar
National Association of State Procurement Officials (NASPO). 2003. Survey of State and Local Government Purchasing Practices. Lexington, KY: NASPO.Google Scholar
Nownes, Anthony. 2006. Total Lobbying: What Lobbyists Want (and How They Try To Get It). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Organisation of Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). 2001. “The Size of Government Procurement Markets.” Journal of Budgeting 1:1–66.Google Scholar
Persson, Torsten, and Tabellini, Guido. 2005. The Economic Effects of Constitutions. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Ranney, Austin. 1976. “Parties in State Politics.” In Politics in the American States, eds. Jacob, Herbert and Vines, Kenneth. 3rd ed. Boston, MA: Little, Brown & Co.Google Scholar
Reich, Arie. 1999. International Public Procurement Law. London, UK: Kluwer Law International.Google Scholar
Rose-Ackerman, Susan. 1997. “The Political Economy of Corruption.” In Corruption and the Global Economy, ed. Elliott, Kimberly Ann. Washington, DC: Institute for International Economics.Google Scholar
Rose-Ackerman, Susan. 1999. Government and Corruption: Causes, Consequences, and Reform. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rothenberg, Lawrence S., and Sanders, Mitchell S.. 2000. “Severing the Electoral Connection: Shirking in the Contemporary Congress.” American Journal of Political Science 44:310–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scheve, Kenneth, and Slaughter, Matthew J.. 2004. “Economic Insecurity and the Globalization of Production.” American Journal of Political Science 48:662–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shleifer, Andrei, and Vishny, Robert W.. 1993. “Corruption.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 108:599–618.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Southwick, James D. 1992. “Binding the States: A Survey of State Law Conformance with the Standards of the GATT Procurement Code.” Journal of International Business Law 13:57–99.Google Scholar
Srivastava, Vivek. 2003. “India's Accession to the Government Procurement Agreement: Identifying Costs and Benefits.” In India and the WTO, eds. Mattoo, Aaditya and Stern, Robert M.. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Tanzi, Vito. 1995. “Fiscal Federalism and Decentralization: A Review of Some Efficiency and Macroeconomic Aspects.” In World Bank Annual Conference on Development Economics. Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
Treisman, Daniel. 2000. “The Causes of Corruption: A Cross-National Study.” Journal of Public Economics 76:399–457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
United States Bureau of Census. Various years. The Annual Survey of State Government Finances. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
United States Bureau of Labor Statistics. 1998. Geographical Profile of Employment and Unemployment. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
Weingast, Barry R. 1995. “The Economic Role of Political Institutions; Market-Preserving Federalism and Economic Development.” Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 11:1–31.Google Scholar
Wildavsky, Aaron. 1979. How to Limit Government Spending. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
World Trade Organization (WTO). 1999. Trade Policy Review, United States, Report by the Secretariat. WT/TPR/S/56. IDA/8 Geneva, SWI: WTO.Google Scholar
World Trade Organization (WTO). 2002. Statistics for 1996 reported under Article XIX:5 of the Agreement, Report by the United States. GPA/21/Add.3. Geneva, SWI: WTO.Google Scholar