Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-30T23:22:02.441Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Legislative Organization Theory and Committee Preference Outliers in State Senates

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 January 2021

David W. Prince  and
L. Marvin Overby
David W. Prince
Affiliation:
Bellarmine University
L. Marvin Overby
Affiliation:
University of Missouri
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Recently, several studies of Congress and the state legislatures have found evidence to support the information theory of legislative organization, that is, that legislatures develop committees whose characteristics reflect those of the parent body so as to acquire unbiased policy and political information. However, most of these studies have been conducted on the lower, larger legislative chambers. Senates, as smaller bodies that often follow the lead of legislation originating in their lower chambers, may have less need for unbiased information, perhaps allowing those bodies to develop more outlying, unrepresentative committees. We test this hypothesis in 42 state senates and find that unrepresentative committees also tend to be the exception in these upper chambers. Furthermore, as shown in previous studies of state house committees, the frequency of committee outliers in state senates appears to be idiosyncratic, with cultural, political, and institutional variables being unable to account for their observed patterns. While results support the information theory of legislative organization, evidence of outliers among party delegations on committees in these senates provides some support for the party-dominant theory.

Type
Research Article
Information
State Politics & Policy Quarterly , Volume 5 , Issue 1 , Spring 2005 , pp. 68 - 87
Copyright
Copyright © The American Political Science Association, 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adler, E. Scott. 2000. “Constituency Characteristics and the ‘Guardian’ Model of Appropriations Subcommittees, 1959-1998.” American Journal of Political Science 44:104–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adler, E. Scott, and Lapinski, John S.. 1997. “Demand-Side Theory and Congressional Committee Composition: A Constituency Characteristics Approach.” American Journal of Political Science 41:895–918.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ainsworth, Scott H., and Akins, Frances. 1997. “The Informational Roles of Caucuses in the U.S. Congress.” American Politics Quarterly 25:407–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aldrich, John H., and Coleman Battista, James S.. 2002. “Conditional Party Government in the States.” American Journal of Political Science 46:164–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Basehart, Hubert Harry. 1980. “The Effect of Membership Stability on Continuity and Experience in U.S. State Legislative Committees.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 5:55–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Battista, James S. Coleman. 2004. “Re-examining Legislative Committee Representativeness in the States.” State Politics and Policy Quarterly 4:161–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brams, Steven J. 1989. “Are the Two Houses of Congress Really Co-Equal?” In The Federalist Papers: The New Institutionalism and the Old, eds. Grofman, Bernard and Wittman, Donald. New York: Agathon.Google Scholar
Brown, Robert D., Davis, Jennifer M., Overby, L. Marvin, Smith, Charles E., and Holian, David R.. 1997. “The Dynamics of Committee Outliers: Evidence from the House of Representatives, 1951-1990.” Journal of Legislative Studies 3:70–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burden, Barry C., Caldeira, Gregory A., and Groseclose, Tim. 2000. “Measuring Ideologies of U.S. Senators: The Song Remains the Same.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 25:237–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cox, Gary W., and McCubbins, Mathew D.. 1993. Legislative Leviathan: Party Government in the House. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Davidson, Roger H., and Oleszek, Walter J.. 1998. Congress and Its Members. 6th ed. Washington, DC: CQ Press.Google Scholar
Deering, Christopher J., and Smith, Steven S.. 1997. Committees in Congress. 3rd ed. Washington, DC: CQ Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fenno, Richard F. Jr. 1966. The Power of the Purse: Appropriations Politics in Congress. Boston, MA: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
Francis, Wayne L. 1989. The Legislative Committee Game: A Comparative Analysis of Fifty States. Columbus, OH: The Ohio State University Press.Google Scholar
Gilligan, Thomas W., and Krehbiel, Keith. 1990. “Organization of Informative Committees by a Rational Legislature.” American Journal of Political Science 34:531–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Groseclose, Tim. 1994. “Testing Committee Composition Hypotheses for the U. S. Congress.” Journal of Politics 56:440–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Groseclose, Tim, and King, David C.. 2001. “Committee Theories Reconsidered.” In Congress Reconsidered, eds. Dodd, Lawrence C. and Oppenheimer, Bruce I.. 7th ed. Washington, DC: CQ Press.Google Scholar
Hall, Richard L., and Grofman, Bernard. 1990. “The Committee Assignment Process and the Conditional Nature of Committee Bias.” American Political Science Review 84:1149–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamm, Keith E. 1980. “U.S. State Legislative Committee Decisions: Similar Results in Different Settings.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 5:31–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herron, Michael C. 1999. “Artificial Extremism in Interest Group Ratings and the Preferences versus Party Debate.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 24:525–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hinich, Melvin J. 1977. “Equilibrium in Spatial Voting: The Median Voter Result is an Artifact.” Journal of Economic Theory 16:208–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keefe, William J., and Ogul, Morris S.. 2001. The American Legislative Process: Congress and the States. 10th ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Kiewiet, Roderick, and McCubbins, Mathew D.. 1991. The Logic of Delegation: Congressional Parties and the Appropriations Process. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Krehbiel, Keith. 1990. “Are Congressional Committees Composed of Preference Outliers?” American Political Science Review 84:149–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krehbiel, Keith. 1991. Information and Legislative Organization. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krehbiel, Keith. 1994. “Deference, Extremism, and Interest Group Ratings.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 19:61–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krehbiel, Keith. 2001. “Plausibility of Signals by a Heterogeneous Committee.” American Political Science Review 95:453–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krishna, Vijay, and Morgan, John. 2001. “Asymmetric Information and Legislative Rules: Some Amendments.” American Political Science Review 95:435–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kritzer, Herbert M. 1978. “Ideology and American Political Elites.” Public Opinion Quarterly 42:484–502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liebowitz, Arleen, and Tollison, Robert. 1980. “A Theory of Legislative Organization: Making the Most of Your Majority.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 94:261–77.Google Scholar
Londregan, John, and Snyder, James M.. 1994. “Comparing Committee and Floor Preferences.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 19:233–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maltzman, Forrest. 1995. “Meeting Competing Demands: Committee Performance in the Post-reform House.” American Journal of Political Science 39:653–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marshall, Bryan W., Prins, Brandon C., and Rohde, David W.. 1997. “Theories of Legislative Organization: An Empirical Study of Committee Outliers in the Senate.” Working Paper, Political Institutions, and Public Choice Program. Michigan State University.Google Scholar
Mayhew, David. 1974. Congress: The Electoral Connection. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Medina, J. Michael. 1987. “The Origination Clause in the American Constitution: A Comparative Survey.” Tulsa Law Journal 23:165–203.Google Scholar
Overby, L. Marvin, and Kazee, Thomas A.. 2000. “Outlying Committees in the Statehouse: An Examination of the Prevalence of Committee Outliers in State Legislatures.” Journal of Politics 62:701–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Overby, L. Marvin, Kazee, Thomas A., and Prince, David W.. 2004. “Committee Outliers in State Legislatures.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 29:81–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poole, Keith T. 1981. “Dimensions of Interest Group Evaluation of the U.S. Senate, 1969-1978.” American Journal of Political Science 25:49–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poole, Keith T., and Daniels, Steven. 1985. “Ideology, Party, and Voting in the U.S. Congress, 1959-1980.” American Political Science Review 79:373–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poole, Keith T., and Rosenthal, Howard. 1991. “Patterns of Congressional Voting.” American Journal of Political Science 35:228–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poole, Keith T., and Rosenthal, Howard. 1997. Congress: A Political-Economic History of Roll Call Voting. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Price, David E. 1978. “Policy Making in Senate Committees: The Impact of Environmental Factors.” American Political Science Review 72:548–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rogers, James R. 1998. “Bicameral Sequence: Theory and State Legislative Evidence.” American Journal of Political Science 42:1025–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rohde, David W. 1991. Parties and Leaders in the Post-reform House. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenthal, Alan. 1974. Legislative Performance in the States. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Shepsle, Kenneth A. 1978. The Giant Jigsaw Puzzle. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Shepsle, Kenneth A., and Weingast, Barry R.. 1995. “Positive Theories of Congressional Institutions.” In Positive Theories of Congressional Institutions, eds. Shepsle, Kenneth A. and Weingast, Barry R.. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sinclair, Barbara. 2000. Unorthodox Lawmaking: New Legislative Processes in the U.S. Congress. 2nd ed. Washington, DC: CQ Press.Google Scholar
Snyder, James M. 1992. “Artificial Extremism in Interest Group Ratings.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 17:319–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Squire, Peverill. 1992. “Legislative Professionalization and Membership Diversity in State Legislatures.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 17:69–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
State Yellow Book. Various dates. New York: Monitor Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Story, Joseph. [1833] 1987. “Commentaries on the Constitution.” In The Founders' Constitution, eds. Kurland, Phillip B. and Lerner, Ralph. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Weingast, Barry R., and Marshall, William. 1988. “The Industrial Organization of Congress.” Journal of Political Economy 96:132–63.Google Scholar
Wilson, James. [1791] 1987. “Legislative Department, Lectures in Law.” In The Founders' Constitution, eds. Kurland, Phillip B. and Lerner, Ralph. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Wilson, Woodrow. 1885. Congressional Government. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar